this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
162 points (99.4% liked)

politics

28763 readers
4031 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/56303965

Apparently there was no reason to attack Iran.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 hours ago

They are doing this deliberately to keep Americans confused, and so the biased can pick the narrative that best suits them. Americans are very superficially engaged in what’s happening abroad, so any propaganda will do until it becomes an existential crisis.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 14 points 14 hours ago

Shit, I'm still waiting for Trump to form a coherent sentence.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 66 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Why did he do it? Let's hear it from the horse's mouth: 

Also, Epstein files. 

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Well, that's different. He was talking about Obama, and Obama is clearly from Kenya an Kenya people think different.

MAGAphiles probably

[–] thethrilloftime69@feddit.online 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Every accusation a confession

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

It's nearly a perfect axiom at this point. Even in this article where all the allegations are pointing to the very good possibility Israel forced Trump's (tiny) hand--his response is to say that he forced Israel's hand. Knowing his incapability of telling the truth but his penchant for polar-opposite lies, it's at the point now that i feel you can predict the truth of his statements by simply working out whatever the opposite of what he says may be.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

We're all on the same side here, and I don't want to split hairs. Still, I just wanted to point out that what you posted is more like straight from the horse's ass.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

And I can't present a fist-sized diamond. You simply cannot present what you don't have.

[–] atropa@piefed.social 8 points 14 hours ago

Distraction epstein papers

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

US administration struggles to present coherent narrative on why it went to war with Iran

US administration struggles to present coherent narrative on why it went to war ~~with Iran~~

US administration struggles to present coherent narrative ~~on why it went to war with Iran~~

US administration struggles ~~to present coherent narrative on why it went to war with Iran~~

[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago

"US administration struggles to present coherent narrative ~~on why it went to war with Iran~~"

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, yes. I shall provide a justification for the war on Trump's behalf, as a devout follower of Vengeful Christ and Merciless Mary.

You see, after conquering the Roman Empire, Jesus viewed the Persians as enemies of God Himself. Those who follow Zoroastrianism do not follow God. It is for this reason Jesus sought revenge against the Persians for their lack of faith, and instituted pogroms to remove any of Persian descent from the Empire. Regrettably, Jesus was unable to complete His campaign against the Persians before his untimely death.

What Trump thought of as a "feeling" was actually an order from Vengeful Christ, to finish what He started. Jesus considers the existence of Iran to be an affront to His eternal glory, and the region must be subjugated for Jesus' return.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This but unironically. US Military leadership has been pretty open about the war on terror actually being a war on Islam. I don't actually think it's that simple, but I'm sure at least a few high ranking officers sincerely believe that.

If there are antichrists, these people are it. Jesus was violent twice at most and with zero fatalities. Even then, it was to drive out the profiteers who were desecrating the temple by using the idea of God to exploit poor people.

If they get their wish for the return of a Rambo Jesus, they're gonna be pretty shocked when he starts cleaning house in the mega churches, as the Bible claims he did in the temple.

[–] scathliath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago

Frankly, the savior deserves a belt fed at this point, as a treat.

[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I'm old enough to remember the Iraq "doublya emm deez" and GW calling everything nookyalar. It was pretty insulting to everyone's intelligence.

This is...just openly taunting us.

[–] Numinous_Ylem@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

Watch any Trump speech from the last whenever and watch him struggle with the concept of a coherent narrative in general

It's still frown upon to say "We're doing it because I don't want you to talk about how I raped kids". That's why.

[–] 58008@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

What ever happened to 'crazy?'

- Chris Rock

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago

The reason is simple, Trump wanted a war, a proper, high death rate war, that is the reason.