this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
189 points (97.0% liked)

Privacy

31833 readers
131 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 46 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

There's also this gem at the end

Aylo can expect that law enforcement will continue watching Pornhub closely

ETA : if you don't read arstechnica, really , you should

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Also rages on.

[–] CodeName@infosec.pub 49 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are they going to institute the same rules for every online streaming service? Because what if the parents don't set up controls and their kids watch an R rated movie?

This is the parents responsibility and there are tools to keep kids from seeing harmful content.

[–] Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are you still thinking it's about kids and adult content? 😮‍💨

[–] RandoCalrandian@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

It’s clearly about trying to erase anonymity or even the pretense of it on the internet.
For the children and terrorists are just about always the excuse it starts with

[–] ad_on_is@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

"PornHub pulls out" 🙊

[–] dontblink@feddit.it 24 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What about sexual and emotional education in schools?

[–] folkrav@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The people who really think of age verification as effective measures tend to also be against having those in schools in the first place.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Oh they’ve wanted that gone forever.

[–] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

That would involve cutting 0.001% of the road budgets... Nope!!

[–] Metal_Zealot@lemmy.ml 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No one's made a "pulling out" joke yet?

[–] swag_money@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

other than the one in the title?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


To kick off the new year, Montana and North Carolina joined a growing number of states enforcing laws requiring age verification to access adult content online.

"While safety and compliance are at the forefront of our mission, giving your ID card every time you want to visit an adult platform is not the most effective solution for protecting our users, and in fact, will put children and your privacy at risk.”

According to CNN, Pornhub and its private equity owners, Ethical Capital Partners (ECP), are currently working with big tech companies to create new device-based age verification solutions.

Those efforts include lobbying Apple, Google, and Microsoft to "develop a technological standard that might turn a user’s electronic device into the proof of age necessary to access restricted online content."

A Pornhub spokesperson told Ars that the technology to accomplish device-based age verification "exists today," but "what is required is the political and social will to make it happen.

As a result of the investigation, in addition to scrutiny from state lawmakers, Aylo can expect that law enforcement will continue watching Pornhub closely.


The original article contains 992 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I’m also uncomfortable with device based age verification. That sounds an awful lot like a massive privacy violation that will have far more false positives and false negatives than are reasonable. It’s giving strong “AI face recognition” vibes

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

"develop a technological standard that might turn a user’s electronic device into the proof of age necessary to access restricted online content."

Can we not? Can parents just take care of their kids like they have for thousands of years instead of futility trying to babyproof the internet for a minority of people? Jesus.

[–] Outtatime@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So there are laws that people agree with that say people under 18 cannot buy/see porn at the store. What makes this any different

[–] Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Probably the bigger issue is the centralization of the internet

If we would have some more decentralized way of consuming content, then it would be harder to censor or control it

The internet nowadays is essentially just google, facebook, and pornhub

So applying a rule you can just target one company which will comply anyway because this is communism

[–] Outtatime@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I believe the responsibility should be on the parents to keep their children from viewing porn before they're 18. Not the government. I also believe there should be at least some control over what minors have access to. Will it ever be 100%? Nope. All we can do is the best we can do