this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
34 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

19458 readers
2496 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] edinbruh@feddit.it 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

This looks more complex than it needs to be. We can just merge those two IFF soundnesses at the top and remove transitive implications and we are left with a straight line with a couple bifurcations to cul de sacs.

Also... I only know constructive logics and abstract interpretation with Galois connections... Where do they fit in this? ๐Ÿฅบ

[โ€“] Bubs@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Any nerds able to give us the TL;DR on what this actually means?

[โ€“] fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Well it's obvious. Soundness is when the

[โ€“] Bubs@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

Ahhhhh.... I get it! It's really about how the

[โ€“] fubarx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

There's no allowing for Unspecial Soundness.

Or where most fun knowledge resides: Unspecial Unsoundness.

[โ€“] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[โ€“] perishthethought@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Caught my eye too. They're talking about mEEEeeee!!

[โ€“] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

We finally made it into a research paper, and it's not a medical case study!