this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
391 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

82516 readers
5687 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New York just proposed the most invasive state-level age verification bill the US has seen. Senate Bill S08102 would extend age verification requirements down to the device itself: internet-connected devices, operating system providers, and app stores would all be required to implement what the bill calls “age assurance” before users can access their own hardware and software ecosystems.

Edit:

Meta is one of the lobbyists for the age verification bill.

Into the Metaverse: The Money and Motivations Behind Meta’s App Store Gambit

In May 2025, Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) and Representative John James (R-MI) introduced the App Store Accountability Act (ASAA), a bill that would require app stores to verify users’ ages and obtain parental consent for users under 18. Meta has bankrolled a wildly expensive lobbying campaign to enact ASAA and its state-level analogs, and instead of recoiling in horror at taking kid privacy advice from Meta, some lawmakers are credulously going along with it.

Confirmed by Bloomberg : Meta Clashes With Apple, Google Over Age Check Legislation

The struggle has pitted Meta Platforms Inc. and other app developers against Apple Inc. and Alphabet Inc.’s Google, the world’s largest app stores. Lobbyists for both sides are moving from state to state, working to water down or redirect the legislation to minimize their clients’ risks.

This year alone, at least three states — Utah, Texas and Louisiana — passed legislation requiring tech companies to authenticate users’ ages, secure parental consent for anyone under 18 and ensure minors are protected from potentially harmful digital experiences. Now, lobbyists for all three companies are flooding into South Carolina and Ohio, the next possible states to consider such legislation.

in addition, there are Over 50 Child Advocacy Groups Unite to Demand App Store Accountability

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Brought to you by the state that passed gun clip size limits effectively making 99.9% of the standard issue carry for law enforcement illegal with no exception.

These people are morons and only concerned with controlling you.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago

This is a good example for how democracy under capitalism tends to serve the interests of the Epstein class above the rest of us.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 17 points 1 day ago

I hope Mamdani and friends oppose this piece of shit. It exists to erase sexuality that doesn't belong to the straight white dude, alongside filling the pockets of the wealthy by watching our every move.

[–] kittykillinit@lemy.lol 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Woah. Crazy how governments around the world are all doing this in lock-step.

It's almost like we're all being ruled by a handful of families haha.

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 16 points 1 day ago

Yep but point it out and you're the crazy person 🙄

[–] mech@feddit.org 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Hell, let's go one step further and force it on the user level:
Every time you want to access an online service, a government-appointed doctor comes to your house and does an X-ray of your clavicle to determine bone ossification, dental examinations, and a DNA methylation test to determine your biological age.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's very important that this happens every time, in order to catch anyone who ages backwards.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 21 hours ago

Benjamin Button starts freaking out

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is a clearly coordinated attack on the civilians to get more data to sell and spy on them.

This isn't a coincidence that these bills pop around at the same time.

[–] barryamelton@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Agree. But it's "citizens" not civilians. "Civilians" are those that aren't military. Civilians are virtually everybody, police included. The USA started this double-speak ~15 years ago, where they pretend that police are military, and police aren't civilians. Please stop rewiring your brain by using their language.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

"Child advocacy groups", funded by billionaires.

If you can't see it, you need to peel back a few more layers.

[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah, because those devices have age-inappropriate content already pre-installed amirite???

Honestly though, how the fuck do they keep justifying the mental gymnastics behind this, from a judicial standpoint? If you were to never set a foot on the internet after buying the device, there's no need for age verification; and even if you do, as long as you don't visit any site that hosts inappropriate content, it still doesn't warrant an age verification.

It's up to the content platform to ensure that no child visits inappropriate content. Think about it: a store IDs a person when they try to buy alc/tobacco, NOT when they just enter the store.

I can't believe this passes legislation just like that.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is like mandating that bicycles require age verification, since someone could bike to the liquor store and lie about their age.

[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Kudos, that's an even better metaphor.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I can't believe all of you who are opposed to this.

Won't you think of the poor data brokers who's entire library of intimate personal details about every person who's ever used a smartphone is practically worthless without the ability to link it to your actual identity.

Screw the children, think of the shareholders you monsters.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Christian fundie groups trying to get rid of porn on the web. Other groups seeking to eliminate anonymity from the web.

Meta is likely going along with it because it protects them from child vulnerability lawsuits.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If they succeed in getting rid of internet porn, there will be only website and it would be www.bringbacktheporn.com

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Weren't the red hats the ones bitching about "the nanny state"?

[–] TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The same crowd that needs the second amendment to stand up to tyranny but are nowhere to be found when tyranny is actually happening?

You mean the hypocrite amendment?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 99 points 1 day ago (41 children)

Parents can age check their kids manually. We should not identify every user on the internet.

load more comments (41 replies)
[–] pharceface@retrolemmy.com 9 points 1 day ago

What states aren’t trying to pull this bullshit? There have to be at least a few.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 161 points 1 day ago (20 children)

... I really don't want to have to stop using all fucking technology now. Ffs this is absolutely disgustingly absurd. EVERYTHING GETS HACKED I am not tying my ID and real name to literally everything I do on an electronic device...

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

Yay! More places where devs will just say you can't run their stuff.

I'm pretty sure I don't need to use anything built by a company so preoccupied with my birthday.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Children aren’t purchasing their devices, adults are, so why would an adult need to prove that they’re over 18? They can just state that the individual receiving the device is under 18…. Oh so you’re saying it’s not actual about the safety of children?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Politicians who unwaveringly support The King of the Pedophiles and a serial rapist think want me to believe they're "protecting the children."

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lobbying remains more powerful than carefully considered debate.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

snd more powerful than voting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck these oligarchs trying to solve a parenting problem with technology and eroding everyone's privacy.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

trying to solve a parenting problem with technology

That was never the goal, just the excuse.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 92 points 1 day ago

We're going to PROTECT Children by ~~Arresting Epstein's Associates!~~ ~~NOT Bombing Schools!~~ ~~Arresting ANY Pedophile in the Epstein Files!~~ ~~Making the BEST Childhood Vaccines available!~~ having Jeffrey Epstein's Friend Peter Thiel track Adults!

Scammers and hackers around the world celebrated at getting their hands on your ID info.

load more comments
view more: next ›