EndlessNightmare

joined 2 years ago
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think the point is choice. Even those living in suburban and urban areas have a difficult time opting out of car-dependence.

If you choose to live rural, I would say that automobiles are part and parcel to that decision. It's just the nature of low population density.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

What much of it comes down to is trust.

Can we trust that these systems will legitimately be used to improve public safety and not as a backdoor by the government to exert greater control? The skepticism is not unfounded.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The commodification of life itself.

Once you understand that we are just livestock to those in charge, a lot of their behavior starts to make more sense.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's so difficult to get excited about new tech anymore.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 36 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Automobile-centric infrastructure was such a colossal societal fuck-up.

Bad for personal health, physical safety, household finances, and the environment. Automobiles are not a symbol of freedom, they are a symbol of dependence.

Money > humans > pets > wildlife > farm animals

It is certainly open to interpretation.

One could say "yes, they are different because humans can explicitly state when they are ready to go." I don't think that was the point they were aiming for though.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In a word: distraction. Alternately, the "circuses" in "bread and circuses"

Well shit, would you look at that. UTC +5:45

Online doesn't have the same element of confrontation

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

New Zealand in the "mutilations and genocide" zone?

view more: next ›