I'm guessing, by the way that they responded, that they do not intend to have children. Thus their children won't have to deal with a higher tax burden since they simply won't exist.
At least that's what I inferred.
EndlessNightmare
joined 1 year ago
This is one reason why I liked when you could physically remove the battery on phones.
But your (non-existent) kids won't have to deal with it!
Wise cracks aside, on a more serious note:
-
Reproduction is an inefficient way to transmit ideas. The $300K and countless hours spent to raise even a single child could reach a much wider audience if put towards education, outreach, etc
-
The ship has already sailed on climate change. You'd just be creating new victims.
-
So what's the plan? Try and "outbreed" the religious conservatives? No thanks.
"Look at me. I'm the ~~captain~~ mod now."
The Biden admin already targeted UN officials and the ICC.
And this is exactly why absolutely no one should be giving him a pass. He went the extra fucking mile to act as an accomplice.
Opting out of reproduction is one of the smartest and most impactful things that the average person can do right now.
The world is an absolute dumpster fire, and the situation only seems to be deteriorating.
Really? Not even countries in open war saw a decline?
🎵 I did it all for the butt lift (Come on)
The butt lift (Come on)
So you can take that fat blob
And stick it up your (Yeah)
Stick it up your (Yeah) 🎵
Even the honeybees don't want to be here anymore
"You know what he did? He kicked him in the penis."
If everyone got together and did the individual action, it would become significant.
But getting a big percentage of the population to come together and do something is the challenge.
view more: next ›
The Democratic party is tearing itself apart