this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
84 points (88.2% liked)

Canada

10122 readers
702 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vanderbilt@beehaw.org 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Conservatism in Canada was largely of the garden variety before their southern neighbors took a hard swing right. Now they parrot whatever they hear south of the border. It's no wonder when you consider how much of Canadian media and products come from the US. How many of these nut jobs wear hats of a foreign politician and spout nonsense about the "amendments" of a constitution that doesn't apply to them? If they want to put the breaks on this they need to curb US cultural influence. Will it be easy? Not at all, in fact it will be painful.

[–] morbidcactus@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago

Don't discount us, Gavin McInnes and Jordan Peterson are both Canadian and Harper currently heads the IDU.

There was the whole proroguing of parliament too after they had a non-confidence vote and an ndp-liberal coalition with bloc and green party supporter was proposed, fell through during that period and the Tories attacked coalitions as somehow being illegal or undemocratic.

[–] zaphod@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

More simply: Canadian conservatives have always followed their American counterparts, and that now includes down the rabbit hole.

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The internet was supposed to make it harder to weaponize ignorance in theory... wow did that not pan out.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago

There’s a lot of money to be made by keeping people ignorant

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

It's because state actors like the Kremlin and CCP are pumping misinformation into social media.

[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

I was so hopeful back in the 90s but that sure didnt last long.

The Straight Dope has been at it since before the internet age and their slogan says it all...

"Fighting ignorance since 1973 (it's taking longer than we thought)"

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The extreme right-wing psychopaths were never about COVID. Protesting gender and sexuality expression is a bit closer to their true cause and nature, but still a misdirection.

Their goal is to recreate Canada as a white, heterosexual, Christian patriarchy. Back to the days of Sundown Towns, lynching, and barring "injuns" from bars and hotels.

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago

Their end goal is to hurt other people to make themselves feel like they have a modicum of control over their own lives. Who those people are isn't really important to them in the long-term.

[–] WiseThat@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yep. The goal of all of this this is to force people into straight marriages because that's all that matters to religious zealots.

They know that if kids practice safe sex they won't get pregnant and 'shot gun marriage' rates will go down.

They know that if kids discover their gender or sexual identity is non-cis, non-het, or non-monogamous that they might not wind up having a traditional marriage.

The know that people who only have 1 partner in their lifetime are much, much less likely to successfully leave an abusive partner, meaning there's a higher rate of divorce if people learn that having multiple partners in your life is normal and okay.

They know that kids who are educated about healthy sex and consent in relationships are less likely to go along with a child marriage or an assigned marriage.

They know that removing sex ed means more teen pregnancy, more intimate partner abuse, and more child-rape. For religious people whose only goal is to get young women into marriages, those are good things.

Example: An actual elected official in the state of Missouri defending his stance that "Parents Rights" includes the ability to marry off their kids to adults at age 12, because "Do you know any kids that have been married at age 12, I do, and guess what, they're still married". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9H6UJ-uCrgc

These people legitimately believe that it's morally correct to kidnap a 12 year old girl and force her to be entirely subserviant to, and dependent on, some pedophile husband who controls everything they do, because them being trapped in that awful situation means that there's one more marriage in the world.