this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
123 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

6612 readers
108 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Any news that are at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies or tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Inmo Go 3 has a camera cover that speaks volumes about smart glasses right now.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 68 points 1 month ago (2 children)

People wearing smart glasses should be shamed.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

No, nothing so simple. Just break their glasses

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can I just get a camera free version with HUD so I can see notifications and reminders? That's all I want, there's no reason for a camera.

[–] Fetus@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

The camera is there to harvest as much info from you and the people around you as possible.

From the company's perspective, there's no reason to make these without a camera.

Nothing says "I'm perving on you" like smart glasses

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

There are a TON of third-party attachments online, designed not to cover the camera and enhance privacy, but to cover the little light that reveals it's live-recording or streaming.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 15 points 1 month ago

I really hope there is gonna be a law in Europe that these ridiculous things need a red flashing light and a beeping noise when they film. Otherwise you are legally allowed to hit them with a sock full of pennies.

[–] Master167@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago
[–] etherphon@piefed.world 6 points 1 month ago

Just when I start wearing my dark rimmed glasses again these things get popular, now I have to buy new glasses, because they look too much like these and I don't want to be mistaken for wearing them, I feel like I already have, I hate everything.

People shouldn't wear glasses unless they need them, you don't need a HUD for life you fucking dorks.

[–] Hairyfishnuts@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

I best not see you around me with that shit. It's gonna get mighty expensive.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Companies or users?

[–] deforestgump@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

When I see one of these assholes in public I just stare at them very uncomfortably.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 1 month ago