this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
176 points (99.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

15591 readers
472 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/31075060

Perhaps the one silver lining to US imperialism, is that more people will want better public transport

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Subsidizing cars by making transit free because cars suddenly got expensive is the most ass backwards way to get people out of cars and it might just work.

(Subsidizing cars because transit riders have been pay in for the transit fares forever but now that car owners can’t afford their cars, it’s ok to make it free.) Transit should be free.

[–] No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Transit should be free.

Yes.

There is some nuance to this. Transit SHOULD be free, but it takes extremely strong political will to improve transit (add more funding) once it has been made free.

Example: X transit is 50% government funded and 50% fare funded.

Government decides to make if free, 100% government funded. Great!

Or government decides to increase funding to 100%, but fares remain. Now there is a 150% budget to improve the transit.

[–] silly_crotch@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago

Yesthat's what scares me about the free transit idea. If you remove fares but also don't increase funding you're just defunding transit.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

Now that's how you do it!

[–] SomeWeeb@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago
[–] Gobbel2000@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, that is the proper reaction. Much better than cutting taxes on petrol and effectively subsidizing people burning fossil fuels, which Poland is planning to do.