this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
146 points (91.5% liked)

Science Fiction

13639 readers
36 users here now

Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction

December book club canceled. Short stories instead!

We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.

  1. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
  2. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
  4. Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
  5. Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.

Lemmy World Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am personally against it despite Sam Esmail's involvement (I really liked Mr. Robot). It's not that I don't think it could be a good show, it's that NBC has plenty of other properties from former science fiction shows they could redevelop, but they're redeveloping this one instead.

If they want to reboot a show for the third time, why not V considering the first reboot was so disappointing? Or maybe go for the 90s nostalgia and reboot SeaQuest DSV or Earth 2.

And then there's all the Sci-Fi Channel/SyFy properties they have at least some stake of ownership in.

I realize asking for something original is asking too much these days, but can't we at least do something other than Battlestar Galactica every 20 years?

I'm willing to be open-minded and give the show a chance if it gets produced, but I don't think it should be produced in the first place.

(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] freewheel@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Buck Rogers would be a cool one to reboot; plus it already has the " we're going to trash the world " backstory.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

I don't think that's NBC though. NBC does own Flash Gordon I think. Or at least they keep trying to make Flash Gordon happen.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago

It wasn't good the first time around with all the religious hokus pokus. If they god rid of that crap, maybe it might be good.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you combined the last reboot with Esmail's mindfuckery, it would be spectacular. IDK why anyone would be against another run.

Giver.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Esmail isn't the showrunner though, he's only producing it. So I'm less optimistic than you are.

[–] Steveanonymous@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Instead of rebooting everything let’s get another few seasons of westworld (like season one of course)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The zeitgiest would love the 12/13 tribes storylines. Absolutely no way they get convoluted with contemporary middle eastern issues. Nope. Not at all.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Of course, the original 1970s one was Mormon propaganda.

A Mormon blogger explains it quite well- https://www.millennialstar.org/battlestar-galactica-and-mormonism/

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

So Mitt Romney is leaving the Semate to take over the Lorne Green role?

Must see TV indeed, Jedediah

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Well, last time, when they were doing terrorist attacks against the cylons, it was reflecting the middle east at that time. Except the good guys were the terrorists. I thought it was quite brave as there was still a gung ho spirit about the invasion.

I agreed that it will be topical again. Maybe they won't be as brave. Or maybe they'll be braver.

[–] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm pretty much against it because I feel like it's an opportunity to have to explain which BSG is actually the good one of them all to everyone you ever talk to about it. (Also, way way too soon for another reboot!)

[–] kowcop@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Surely it is Buck Rogers turn

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

NBC doesn't own it and there's apparently a whole rights issue thing going on-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_Rogers#Future_films_and_conflict

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago

They should do Galactica vs Ender’s Game.

[–] t0fr@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'd watch a new BSG for sure. I'm not exactly hopeful that it will actually happen. But if it does, I'd still watch it for sure

[–] flumph@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

I'd watch it because I distinctly remember being let down by the ending of the last version -- everything after the writers' strike was hot garbage. American TV really needs to learn to do tight seasons and series instead of dragging everything out until fans give up on it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I'm indifferent.

My care about BSG died when they ended the last reboot with them salivating over finding tribals they could fuck and use as breeding stock.

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

Everything has happened before, and everything will happen again.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social -1 points 10 months ago

I hope they go back to the original source material and come up with something that actually makes sense this time. Maybe take a few details from the newer version that "worked", but otherwise discard it and try again from scratch. Do something new with it.

And if you're going to put "they have a plan" in the tagline for a series, actually have a frickin' plan in mind.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee -3 points 10 months ago

Love this show they can reboot 100 times!

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee -4 points 10 months ago

Why should you or I be for or against it to begin with? I don't quite understand.

We can predict success or failure, but as to whether the company ought to spend it's money that way, I don't see much value in chiming in.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›