this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
89 points (96.8% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

16428 readers
545 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kilmer passed away in 2025 after battling throat cancer. Apparently his character will feature in over an hour of the movie.

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/val-kilmer-ai-generated-new-movie-rcna264195

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 42 minutes ago

Usually i wonder "Oh, xyz is still alive?", feels werid to wonder "Oh, xyz is dead? When did that happen?"

Is this a getting-old thing? :(

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 75 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They've finally done it. Even if You're dead, you still have to fucking go to work.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 23 points 3 hours ago

Which was the point of the movie Robocop, and he got featured in the reboot of it.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago
[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 19 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I would say that if no one paid to see the movie maybe studios would quit doing this, but there are usually a lot of people who don't know or don't care about any given shitty thing, so things get slowly worse.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 hours ago

That's the flow of the world. The vast majority doesn't know and doesn't care. We all get what we deserve in the end though...

[–] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

So they're just making money over a dead guy's likeness. Business as usual then.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

He was going to play the role before he died, and they decided to use AI to recreate his likeness instead of recasting.

So not quite as ghoulish as you might think.

[–] NickeeCoco@piefed.social 32 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

How does that make it not ghoulish?

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 28 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Not quite as ghoulish. Say 99% as ghoulish.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. I'm not saying it's fine, just not as terrible as you might originally think.

[–] homes@piefed.world 12 points 3 hours ago

I’m not sure if that’s a distinction worth making in this case

[–] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

So just holding him to his contractual obligations after death then?

That's not making it any better.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 hour ago

Will his estate see the amount he was contractually obligated for revenue, etc?

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

In that context, that's more ghoulish.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 8 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

that doesn't even look like him.

[–] Monument@piefed.world 3 points 1 hour ago

It looks like someone tried to make Tom Cruise look like Val Kilmer.

Maybe if we see an era of AI reducing people’s individuality and throwing them all into an uncanny valley of blended-together appearances, we’ll wind up with a resurgence of interest in actors with atypical features.

[–] homes@piefed.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Maybe from the early 90s