this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
611 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

84900 readers
3888 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 127 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (44 children)

I'm a creative. I've used InDesign since version 1.0. I've built my career with Adobe tools.

Adobe Creative Cloud peaked around ten years ago. Since then, it's totally jumped the shark. I'm not even talking about the company, just the software and its features.

When I open InDesign, Photoshop, or Illustrator I'm trying to work. It's software I've used for, in some cases, 25 years. My point is, I know it inside and out.

The past few years, every new "feature" gets in the way of my work. Adobe has been changing things that already worked very well, or has added extra steps to do something that used to be easy.

Even worse, Adobe has started to fill its software with notifications that can not be disabled. Invasive blue dots. Invasive blue buttons. Invasive blue overlays that stay visible on the screen even when the software is minimized. Rich tool tips that aren't disabled by the option to disable rich tool tips.

Adobe has lost me as a devotee. It's been taken over by venture capital. The company only cares about adoption of new features.

Now, I use it out habit. Because my workplace provides it. Because it's what folks on my team are used to... but because they've come to the ecosystem so late, they only know a fraction of its capabilities.

If Adobe faces demise, I will mourn what if once was. But not what it has become.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Been using Photoshop since 3.0 released on windows. I knew when they went cloud that shit was going sideways, but it was the acquisition of substance painter that did them in for me. Even though CC was kind of a mess, instead of building on the value proposition and including substance, they decided to have it as a separate charge.

Fuck adobe. Fuck subscription software.

[–] f1error@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Fuck Adobe" is my near-daily mantra. I actually utter it out loud at least once a day, if not more. I used to teach PS and worshipped at the temple of PS. These days, FUCK ADOBE!!!! I cannot wait for ANYTHING to replace Photoshop/Adobe. Adobe MUST die!.

[–] wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

I was like the other commenters in the thread, but I grew up on even somewhat liking Gimp (yet with PhotoGIMP plugin). It’s good enough for me, and in some places it’s even better. All I want from it is to have a bit better UX here and there, but that’s not too critical.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Adobe faces demise, I will mourn what if once was

What wait? You can mourn what it was even now. 🤷‍♂️

[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

While their boot is on your throat, it is difficult to mourn what your oppressor used to be.

load more comments (42 replies)

Well deserved

[–] fira@lemmy.today 64 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fuck Adobe & their subscription model. I switched to affinity & never looked back

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 59 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Adobe has always been pricy. The tradeoff was that you were getting one of the best, if not the best piece of software for that nieche.

They have failed to keep their product the best while trying to lock in users with cancellation fees, which is going to backfire hard.

The only thing they can do to try and maintain dominance now is to go back to quality software that offers features that creatives want.

[–] axh@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"go back to quality software" that sounds expensive! How about we cut our users' legs, so they can't run to the competition?

' - Adobe Executives

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Hurt myself laughing at that last line. Are you doubting the mighty power of enshitification? Are you the last true believer in corporate quality?

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago

Good, fuck Adobe.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean, I use every alternative I can. Vapoursynth scripts, libraw-based projects, random GitHub repos, DaVinci…

But there are some features I just can’t get great support for outside of definitely-not-high-seas Lightroom Classic:

  • Good lens profiles for weird lenses.

  • Proper HDR PQ/HLG editing and AVIF/JXL export support.

  • RAW support for newer cameras, like my little R50V

I have yet to try DaVinci’s photo editing mode though. That’s very interesting.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 23 points 1 month ago

I don't like Adobe, but you have to understand that their business is not selling software, it's keeping people locked into their platform.

A rival being free matter not a jot when you've got decades of work in Adobe formats, and no end of experience with Adobe software. Especially when the company is paying for it all anyway.

[–] gh0stb4tz@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is great news for everyone.

[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

Not for Adobe lol

[–] commander@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We're in a mature software stage for these art software applications. Easier to catch up than create new features that people make essential to their workflow. Today it's commercial alternatives that have closed the gap well enough. Someday in the future open source stuff will. It's inevitable

[–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But now Adobe has generative tools. Every wannabe artist and ass CEOs will look into it as a primary feature.

[–] auntieclokwise@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's only a matter of time before the open source stuff gets those features too, if people want them. There's plenty of decent open source generative AI out there. I'm sure people can find creative ways to incorporate them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Redtrax@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago

Good. Adobe is crap

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

After CS6 did Adobe started going downhill, beginning with subscriptions replacing paid licenses.

Currently using Krita, and sometimes Paint(dot)net for touchups.

[–] WormFood@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (6 children)

A few years ago I replaced Photoshop with Affinity. Affinity's user interface is pretty awful, even compared to Photoshop, but it does at least run a bit better. A few years ago I switched from premiere pro to da Vinci resolve, and though resolve has a bit of a learning curve, overall I think it's better than premiere - it's definitely faster and crashes a lot less.

I'm hoping that audacity 4 is a good enough audio editor to replace audition - we'll see, audition is actually pretty good imo but I'd accept a slight downgrade if it means I can get away from Adobe entirely.

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 month ago (10 children)

If you think Canva won't pull the same shit Adobe does once they have the market dominance to do so, you're deluding yourself.

The only future-proof, user-respecting, dignified alternative is FOSS.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] JakoJakoJako13@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Have you tried Reaper daw? I've been using it for years at this point. It has a free unlimited lifetime demo, or you can pay them $60 for a lifetime license.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 month ago (5 children)

People pay for Adobe?

Haven't used PS in ages. Gimp, Audacity, Inkscape, etc

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gimp is still not an alternative to Ps. Not even close.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Depends on what you're doing with it. For your average person it's more than fine

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lordziv@lemmy.nz 10 points 1 month ago

My organization pays over $200,000 a year for Adobe products :( I swear most of it is just for the ability to edit PDFs

[–] Pipster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most people don't. There is a theory (and I don't know if it was ever verified officially) that Adobe stuff was made so easy to pirate and crack intentionally. That way students and people learning how to use their tools (primarily photoshop) would master it and therefore force any employer they later worked with to get and stay with Adobe and their expensive enterprise licences. The lower the barrier of entry the more people in the workforce could be competent with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 16 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Wonderful! Now I need an Acrobat alternative that my work will accept, and I can kick adobe to the slims from which it came.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Bluebeam revu?

Edit: it's comparably priced to acrobat but is significantly better on all fronts (opens and runs faster and more reliably, markup tools are leagues above, pdf editing tools are more comprehensive, review tools are significantly more advanced, everything is more user friendly. It's wild how much better revu is when it's literally the same price point.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Our engineering department uses bb revu. I'll look into it as a replacement for Acrobat. Thanks!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago

I mean isn't it more of that the industry is just recognizing the war that Adobe started years ago?

full disclaimer all I've read is the damn headline

[–] londos@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

that article is like an alternativeto list

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Maybe not a good look to go "AI! AI! AI!" when the actual creatives who use the product get attacked for using AI:

https://www.oregonlive.com/business/2025/09/a-wonky-image-on-a-powells-books-t-shirt-was-generated-with-help-from-ai-it-caused-an-uproar.html

[–] Deeleres@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I've been using Affinity since 2016 and it has been a good decision so far. Since Affinity Publisher also replaced InDesign (Affinity Designer had already been sufficient for most things), I retired my old CS5.

At work I introduced the programs to my bosses; afterwards all the computers were switched to Affinity, and none of my colleagues miss the old Adobe stuff.

Only one old machine still has an old CS version installed, just for checking and viewing legacy files — it doesn't cost anything anyway.

[–] humanamerican@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Swapping out one proprietary app for another is just delaying the inevitable.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sometimes buying yourself time is a valid strategy, as long as you understand that it is only a delay and not permanent.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TDCN@feddit.dk 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Anyone who knows if I can migrate a huge old light room library. I closed my subscription about 3 years ago and my library has just been sitting there since. All my eddits should be saved in sidecar files but there is probably other stuff saved in the library that could be useful. I tried darktables back then, but I kinda dropped photography as a hobby so never looked much into it. I want to pick it up again some time soon tho

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 6 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›