this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
1606 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
2791 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

All smartphones, including iPhones, must have replaceable batteries by 2027 in the EU::undefined

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mlfh@lemmy.ml 239 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Thank fucking god for the EU, for fighting for global digital rights where nobody else does.

[–] SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org 74 points 1 year ago (5 children)

According to republicans Europe is hell on Earth tho

[–] Moc@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anywhere that isn’t a fascist theocracy is hell on Earth to many republicans

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ghostofjohnnycache@feddit.de 44 points 1 year ago (13 children)

mostly cuz EU gives rights and protections to consumers, not corporations

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 98 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apple in 2027: This is not a battery, it's a.....umm ....... Ultra High Density Low Current Super Capacitor.

[–] dodslaser@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (4 children)

EU: Ok, then in addition to that UHDLCSC you also need a removable battery.

[–] cyberpunk_sunbear@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 2tone@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago (11 children)
[–] Bogasse@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I love how higher IP rating is always the argument, it looks like everybody in this planet is doing daily deep diving and needs its smartphone to do that 😅

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago

Phones with IP67 or even IP68 exist with easily replaceable batteries.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sky@codesink.io 13 points 1 year ago

Are you sure it isn’t satire? I prefer to believe it is.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Rayuza@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (36 children)

All we need now is a headphone jack

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago (4 children)

We need SD cards more. They removed them so they can charge you 300 $ to upgrade 128gb and to force you into shitty cloud service.

Again, just anti consumer bullshit spearheaded by Apple and gargled by Samsung.

[–] el_bhm@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have flashbacks to using external storage on Android. It was such a shit show of an API. That being said, external storage, to break away from cloud storage is the next needed thing. We need to own the data.

[–] beigegull@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (8 children)

When you design an OS to pretend there's no such thing as a file, it ends up being bad at handling files.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] UnderScore@lemm.ee 48 points 1 year ago (8 children)

The fact that some of the gen Z crowd think it will be horrible have forgotten that it was much easier to carry 2 batteries and swap them out vs carrying a charger and cable with you everywhere. Pop in the new battery, power it on and carry on with you now full battery phone. Being tethered to a wall so you can have 10% from 20 minutes of charging is crazy.

[–] chaircat@lemdro.id 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I used to do this. I thought it was awesome but I was literally the only person I ever knew who did this. It was not a popular thing to do.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 38 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It will also likely mean easier repairs. Louis Rossman just did a video on this

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 34 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Stand back everyone, I'm going to attempt nuance.

Industrial design is about tradeoffs. Making the battery easily replaceable will come with drawbacks. Maybe it'll be size, or water resistance, or durability, but something will have to be compromised. The extent of the compromises remains to be seen, and people will have different opinions about whether it's worth it.

Ordinarily I'm not a fan of regulators making product design decisions, because that's exactly the kind of thing market forces are supposed to be good at. In this case, though, there's a demand that's clearly not being met, and companies clearly have a vested interest in pushing consumers toward replacing their old hardware rather than repairing it, which creates externalities markets are unable to account for. Market failures like this are exactly the kind of situation where government regulation is needed.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

It's NOT just phones.

It's EVERYTHING with a battery. Including cars, laptops, e-bikes, video game controllers, headphones etc. (im not even sure if there are exceptions, such as tiny tiny "airpod" like things.. ?)

And they must be (with a few exceptions) replacable by a "layman", without the use of special tools - which means no heat pads, to soften up glue etc etc. (and for gods sake, i hope it also means apple can't hardwareID lock a battery)

an exception mentioned in the EU document about the law says, high power batteries for example in an electric car, must be done by a profesional - but of course it still has to be "replacable" and not.. tear the whole car apart and rebuild it using new batteries.

replacable batteries in headphones, bluetooth mice, laptops etc, is gonna be awesome.

and lets not forget, they have to recycle the old ones - and produce new batteries using recycled materials.

in fact, i will try to hold on replacing my current (2 year old) phone, and wait to get one before 2027. Usually the battery turns to shit in 3ish years.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 year ago (24 children)

My current device and the two before that all have had removable batteries. I've always thought built in batteries are stupid and it's nice to finally notice that other people agree. Hopefully they next mandate that it has to be able to be taken apart with a screwdriver and spare parts must be able to be purchased straight from the manufacturer.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Can't want to be able to buy used phone and just pop in new battery. Still we need a law to allow easier mobile operating systems development for third-parties.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LakesLem@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Pesky EU throwing their weight around giving consumers more rights! --Brexiteer logic

Oh well hopefully we'll (UK) still benefit from it. Easier to design one phone than "EU" and "Rest of world" versions after all.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ineedaunion@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Will literally anyone in the EU help me immigrate? ill do anything to get out of Murica.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] KrisND@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (21 children)

Not a bad idea but there are flaws and this also doesn't seem to address the issue of pricing or availability.

  • So you can remove the battery, will you be able to buy one.
  • They could prevent 3rd parties from making batteries that work.
  • They could just not sell battery replacements.
  • They could add more parts needed, like seals, screws that strip too easily, that annoying sticky tape etc.
[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The your last point the text specify that batteries can be safely removed and replaced using “basic and commonly available tools” and “without causing damage to the appliance or batteries.”

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] squidzorz@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

A portable battery should be considered to be removable by the end-user when it can be removed with the use of commercially available tools and without requiring the use of specialised tools, unless they are provided free of charge, or proprietary tools, thermal energy or solvents to disassemble it. Commercially available tools are considered to be tools available on the market to all end users without the need for them to provide evidence of any proprietary rights and that can be used with no restriction, except health and safety-related restrictions.

I'm glad they got specific. I wonder where Apple's self-service battery replacement program falls under this? AFAIK it's not free. They charge a fee to rent the specialized tools, which are also proprietary.

This gives Apple a few choices:

  1. Make the tools commercially available, but at an astronomical price in typical Apple fashion
  2. Make the tools commercially available at a normal consumer price (unlikely)
  3. Make the self-service battery replacement program free (most likely, but will require a significant revision to the tools used since they are industrial-grade)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Squander@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

EU is killing it right now. Charging port regulation and now removable batteries in everything. If companies are forced to produce different models for the EU maybe just maybe it will be cost effective to just make all their phones with removable batteries. One can hope, cause you know the US wont pass that type of consumer protection regulation.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This needs to be true of notebooks too. I love my 2015 Macbook Air, but the battery lasts about five minutes and I use it way too much to take the time to get it replaced. Especially when it's old enough to not be supported soon. But if I could just spend $50 and replace the battery myself without fucking things up, which I totally would as things stand now, I would be able to use it without keeping it plugged in all the time like I used to.

[–] I_poop_from_there@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Good news, it applies to all battery operated devices, not just phones

[–] ineedaunion@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

EU citizenship is a dream.

[–] 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Looking forward to seeing If companies will just do the bare minimum to pass or if we'll see some actual innovation. It would be cool to be able to buy spare batteries, that are quick to replace and easy to carry around along with a charging station or something so you can always have a full battery with you.

I bet The Apple battery, just a replacement or a dedicated module like I said above, will be starting at like $249

[–] smackjack@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Apple will figure out a way to DRM batteries so that no one but them can sell them and they'll cost as much as a new phone.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›