this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
1144 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

84552 readers
5143 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

Graphene OS need to develop their own app store.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The irony of having this in the middle of the article

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

The capitalists will sell us the noose with which we will hang them? or however it goes...

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

I don't understand why Google would do this. I mean, you sell a phone that has an alternative operating system that runs well on it, and you sell more phones, right? Or do they actually sell hardware at a loss? Is that what's happening?

[–] BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 hours ago

Google is an advertising company. Everything they do is about collecting data to feed their advertising arms.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 14 points 9 hours ago

They don't care about HW. HW is just a "distribution line" for their software. They care more about people using their software and giving them data. Most Android phones sold are not Google's Pixels but third party vendors. If a particular device doesn't sell well they won't care as ling as the Google ecosystem gets strengthend.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 81 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

That’s an American thing, not just Google. They only believe in a free market when it’s their products and services. Theft is fine as long as it’s only them.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 26 points 9 hours ago

When a Capitalist says “free market” what they mean is “free to monopolize.” It’s about keeping the pathway to feudalism free and open. The US is its temple, but Capitalism is a global cancer.

[–] Tolc@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

this is just capitalism thing.

[–] MortUS@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Something something... Capitalism

[–] notso@feddit.org 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

More like neofeudalism at this point.

[–] markon@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

And actual full on fascism to boot.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 5 points 13 hours ago

Same thing if it’s benefitting them

When it isn’t different story

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 101 points 21 hours ago (15 children)

Please consider donating to PostmarketOS to build up a pure mobile Linux alternative that is completely free of Google's influence. It's the best long-term option we have.

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Sailfish is also a great option too

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 20 points 12 hours ago

Unfortunately, Sailfish OS uses a proprietary (closed source) android compatibility layer, as well as a closed source UI.

For the parts they have open-sourced, they implemented a CLA that contributors must sign. It's the HA-CLA-I-ANY license, which specifically allows them a perpetual Copyright and Patent license, and permission to re-license your code contributions to a more restrictive license which enables them sell or package it into a closed-source proprietary app.

Personally I'm be more comfortable supporting the development of PostmarketOS instead, since it is completely open-source with no CLA, meaning no chance of any rug-pulling in the future.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] kamen@lemmy.world 29 points 19 hours ago

I'm not sure if "rival" is the right term. Seems like Google would be very happy to be a monopoly.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 265 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Now it's an international matter of national security. Let's go world, time to de-americanize your tech.

[–] Drewmeister@lemmy.world 111 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yes, but, from the article: ”GrapheneOS also says governments and banks are increasingly adopting these verification systems for things like payments, digital ID apps, and age verification services.

“Instead of governments stopping Apple and Google from engaging in egregiously anti-competitive behavior, they’re directly participating in locking out competition via their own services,” Graphene said."

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 9 hours ago

alot of countries have fully bought into the surveillance thing, UK is planning to give NHS full acces to its patient database to PALANTIR.

[–] synapse1278@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Exactly, it's not only about fighting Google, it's also about setting a better, more open standard for the rest of the market.

Recently my bank has rolled out a new mobile app now relying on Google wallet for NFC payment. I was able to use NFC payment on GrapheneOS on the old app, I can't on the new one. The online banking stuff still works (for now) but no more mobile payment for me. I didn't sign a fucking contract with Google, why would I hand over my payment data to them !

[–] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 2 points 12 hours ago

My bank hands out these weird little plastic cards like it's 2016 or something.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Curious_Canid@piefed.ca 69 points 1 day ago (6 children)

The current US government is strongly in favor of corporations screwing over individuals, so we aren't likely to get any help there. The EU and China are the only organizations that might be able to intervene. Unfortunately, they both seem more interested in the surveillance opportunities than in the good of their citizens.

We seem to be heading toward a two-tiered internet. One that will be accessible to everyone, but will be limited in terms of commerce and possibly content. One that will only be accessible to people who are willing to give up their privacy. That might actually turn out to be a good thing. Buying from the corporations could easily end up limited to the later group, which would encourage more people to shift their buying to other sources.

[–] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 22 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I completely agree.

...and as soon as OpenNIC takes their SSL/TLS Cert generator out of experimental and into something stable - we can start.

Privacy concerned people can start to rebuild the internet based on the original principles of "sharing information and ideas", rather than " maximizing engagement ".

edit: a word

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 19 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Im just waiting for somebody to make a plan for resistance. So far the best I have seen is going to the doorsteps of google to cry and beg them to stop.

thats not my cup of tea

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lonesomeCat@lemmy.ml 26 points 22 hours ago (12 children)

Most people don't care.

Hell I'm even the "weird one" only because I tend to use FOSS options when I can.

Who the hell would use YouTube over NewPipe??

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 28 minutes ago

i had to install Newpipe in my gf's phone, she'd show me something in YT and need to wade through endless shit before getting to the content. I forget occasionally how shitty an experience YT can be if you don't make some effort until i use someone elses device.

[–] cunnililgus@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago

I'm loving grajay tbh

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 15 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Brothers in arms mate. I use FOSS whenever absolutely possible. I hear about a new type of service, and my first criteria before evaluating it is, can I run it as FOSS? If the answer to that question is no, then I immediately reject that new service until I can use it in a FOSS manner. Do not pass go. Do not collect one Monero.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

Time to branch out, get more manufacturer support like Motorola and champion the consumer. C'mon graphene throw us a bone.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 99 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (15 children)

Maybe the EU can slap some fines on that? It's anti competitive and against the DMA i assume

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

You're so out-of-touch if you believe that the EU is against this.

It's especially weird coming from an apparent German. You know all that rhetoric about how the internet is no "wild west". That means locking everything down. Only the properly licensed professionals are allowed to do stuff with properly regulated tools. That's how it goes in Germany.

This stuff is what Google is supposed to do.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Yourimaginaryfriend@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

I was really close to buying one too. Waiting for the next pixel

load more comments
view more: next ›