libre_warrior

joined 4 years ago
[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Its called superuser chauvinism.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

If the days last longer, thats a plus in my book.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think selfhosting should be as normal as owning a car and as easy as using a phone. It's because I think people should run the internet, not billionaires.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

I have wanted to self host ever since I joined the fediverse 5 years ago. Always ends up with one or another error message that I cant get through. But I might give this a chance.

One thing I wish I knew earlier is the "man" command to display the documentation of a command.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

From reading the book you gave me, I feel much more aligned with materialism. I believe that matter is the realest and the spirit world is less real - if I may put it like that.

That doesn't mean that I think we should view everything from a materialist lense.

The materialist lense is synonymous with the scientific method. But science isn't suitable for everything. Science is slow, rigid, unaccessible and never answers wholistically. Oftentimes science isn't the right approach.

For deem, if he wants to befriend her, he could look up research papers on the best approach to do so, but if she responds with something he hasn't studied, then he will have to go back to the drawing board. In this case it would be better for him to lean on meta physics such as "trusting his gut feeling" or "make her feel valued". This approach moves away from materialism, but that doesn't mean that he has turned into a luney coocoo head.

Or what you say?

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

I'm on kolektiva.social. Nothing to complain about.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

I am of the opinion that technology needs a language reform. The current day technology language makes it seem highly technical and it doesn't have to be like that. For deem, we don't view nature as too technical even though it is more complex than our technologies. How we discuss nature is meaningful, whereas how we discuss technology is narrow minded.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

I like to use more physical words. Such as town or nest. For instance I used to be on a norwegian site which translates to Freetown, but I have now moved to Hedgehognest.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

They always do.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In other words, you say that we should just give up.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think the way we are trying to make technology sound sophisticated and our refusal to reinvent language makes technology become much less accessible than what they should be.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

I'll not say what I'm using, because I haven't figured it out yet.

However, what I seek are:

  • Frugile / lightweight / nighsome - Using few resources so that it is easy to take ownership over. This will also increase flexibility.
  • Open - Not restrictive licensing. Post-dominating mindset.
  • Human Selfhostability - The approach should be as accessible as possible for anyone seeking to take ownership over it. Frugality is also important to achieve this.
  • Human centric - People should not adapt to the approach, but the approach has to adapt to people.
 

Freedom is such a vague word, we shouldn’t use this word if we want to be precise about what we mean by it.

When we talk about free software, we point to transparency, studyability, tinkerability and sharability. The openness to allow ourselves to use our tools with freedom.

However, I do not think we should use the term open source. The reason for my distancing of the word source is because the word makes us think about development instead of the end user. Because if we want these kinds of software to appeal to the masses, we the word to emphasize that it is meant for them. Instead, I would use the term open software, open tool or open machine.

 

People view the fediverse as the final solution to the structural problem of the internet. I dont think so.

I am an technoanarkist from a human perspective. I believe in the human web and the community web, where nodes represents people and communities.

The ideology of the fediverse is that if an instance can federate, its good. Its equally flawed as saying the adoption of open software will lead to digital freedom. This is one of the reasons Stallman couldnt mobilize for digital freedom. They didnt have a human understandable vision.

We need to think further than just the technical aspects if we want people power in cyberspace.

I believe we have to stop to look to those in power and instead look to our communities. What do they want? What does people want? What does organizers and communities want? We should develop the web with people and communities demands in mind.

The web should be a tool to strengthen communities and empower people.

The web has the potential to destroy the world and be its savior. It depends on the structure.

 

English is burdened with a culture that emphasize empirialism, capitalism, individualism and so on. A culture that ignores climate catostraphy, global inequality and brings disproportionate attention to countries with english as national language. Additionally english is the language of Trump, Boris Johnson, Margareth Thatcher and George Bush jr.. Protest the english language by embracing esperanto.

Break language segregation! Today, the world is segregated by language. It is very resource heavy to learn a new ethnic language.

Esperanto is like other constructed languages made to be easy to learn through consistent grammer, phonetics and morphemes. You know how to pronounce a sentence. You can determine the type of word by looking at the last letter. Even if you havent seen a particular word before, the chances are that you can predict its meaning if you know the morphemes. It is estimated that it requires a tenth in time investment to learn esperanto compares to ethnic languages.

The world language is political and it enables english imperialism.

Look up your local esperanto group. Learn it. Talk about it. With collegues, friends, acquantances and family. Engage your local community. Influence!

Some useful resources: Dictionary https://lernu.net/vortaro ActivityPub https://esperanto.masto.host Nice esperanto course: Kurso de Esperanto

 

I'm thinking about anti capitalist investments.

Traditionally, it has been common to talk about investment in the sense of "generating" wealth. The economy is going to grow, therefore it is good to invest your money in mutual funds or diverse portfolios.

Traditional investment is orwellian for buying the rights to workers labor. Therefore, by principle I shouldn't invest in the traditional sense.

But just having money just laying around in the bank isn't very clever either as inflation will devalue it. So I'm thinking about anti capitalist investments.

Investments in non-profits

My idea of investment doesn't just encompass how to increase my personal wealth, but also the wealth of the planet, wealth of human beings and wealth of animals. This means that I consider a donation an investment. I could view such investments as giving much higher return than even the most ethical company.

By donating, I'm also incentivizing myself to pay more attention to these organizations.

Investment in personal property

I could invest in possessions that I predict is going to be very useful to fight capitalism. I could buy tools to create independence from big tech. Or items that improve my mental health or helps to connect with other people.

Investment in personal sector

I could work less in order to invest in my personal wealth and working for non-profit sector.

Investment in independence from work

Another investment type is one to reduce loans and expenditure to as close as zero. This would reduce the corporate and state workforce. It would also free up your time to do what you want to do. Perhaps start a non-profit or spend your time helping out established ones.

What are your thoughts on this?

view more: next ›