Also they need to ban Ai videos from YT Kids
this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
87 points (97.8% liked)
Technology
84949 readers
5583 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
will someone please think of the retention numbers
a measure that will actually help protecting kids? Not on their watch
The problem isn't spotting them. They're fucking obvious slop. The problem is that they have inundated every fucking crevice of that website so you can't watch a goddamn video without tripping over one.
I actually support this as long as the false positives are not too bad
I don't think Youtube's history on false positives for things is all that stellar. Maybe if they get AI to help it will... oh, no, it will make it far worse than even Youtube can do alone.
Let us filter out the AI videos cowards
It kind of does it by itself if you use the algorithm correctly, I was seeing some AI slop in my shorts like a year ago but after having disliked it/reported it, it seems to have gone away. I haven’t seen a single AI video in many months
Same. I never see AI slop. Or politics. My algorithm is dialed in and my recommended is all bangers.
That's a trial and error approach for something that could easily be a simple setting.
It also doesn't work if you use an alternative front end or aren't signed in.
Additionally it also depends entirely on the content you view and your viewing enough of it to train the algorithm, which means new accounts or little used accounts have no recourse.
Sounds good now. Sounds like an excuse to 'accidentally' flag videos they don't want getting clicks in the future.
You mean the YouTube that dumps out AI summaries of the videos you're on their platform specifically to watch directly? That YouTube?
Surely they aren't a company composed of two-faced slimeballs like their parent. That would be unheard of.
Obligatory "fuck AI," however I've reluctantly found that the AI summaries can be helpful on occasion, such as when deciding if a video with a clickbaity title is actually worth watching, or when I'm on YouTube looking for a solution to a problem (in which case the summary can sometimes get me the content way faster than watching the video). So of all the dumb shit YouTube has done to their platform in recent years, I'd argue the AI summaries fall on the "actually not that bad" end of the spectrum.
That's very fair, it's definitely in the vein of what LLMs are (theoretically) meant for, i.e. summarization and language parsing/analysis. I find that LLMs work pretty well for translation too. It's just a shame that executives have run it to the ground like they usually do. And the people poisoning us are the same ones treating it in this case.
Hello. Thank you for clicking on [this video]. Today. We will be looking at the topic of. Detecting eye videos on You Tube.
My bet is it will only check for SynthID
It's very easy to not watch the ai videos when it's getting more difficult to watch youtube without an account.