this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
287 points (98.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

17035 readers
325 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 122 points 1 month ago (29 children)

We're destroying the environment for this folks

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] XPost3000@lemmy.ml 54 points 1 month ago

This is why the steam deck is $1,000 btw

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Whenever I see these, I try them out. Sometimes I can reproduce them, this one I can't. However, I remain extremely skeptical and believe that whenever one of these screenshots goes around, someone at LLM Company hard codes a fix for that specific fuck up. Against how many of these hard fixes does each LLM answer get checked nowadays?!

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

On the very long list of shitty things about AI is the fact that they are non-deterministic.

I was however able to get this fuckup on first try:

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wow, you're right. I got three different answers over five queries.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

Right. Cause they aren’t answering the question. They are just determining the next most likely word.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses

I'm sure it's fine. After all, the AI triple-checked its answer!

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I just tried this one and got:

There are 2 t's in the word colonialism:

colonialism

They are located at the end of the word: the t and i at the end of the sequence.

They usually include some randomness in the responses which is why they don’t always respond the same way (and sometimes will even often but not always get the answer correct, or visa versa).

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am also trying from a non English speaking country, pretty sure that has an impact as well on behavior.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That could be, but I think a lot of the models are the same because they can speak many languages pretty well. I’ve had a lot of success with talking to models I normally prompt in English using other languages. But I have also seen Chinese appear unprompted in response to English queries from certain Chinese models a few times.

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, an LLM itself doesn't make that much of a difference. But Google does. Features and "features" often show up later on non English Google. The AI summary took a few months to appear on German google – even if you set your language to English.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I tried it, and got similiar shorter answers but not the exact same answer. Sometimes it ends up getting it right at the end after fumbling a lot, and sometimes it just fails completely.

Searching on Google directly sometimes doesn't produce the AI Overview on stuff like these in my experience, but passing the search to Google from DDG with the bang (!g) almost always produces the AI Overview.

edit: I tried it again and it grew the ability of humor:

There are 2 't's in the word colonialism. colt-a-ca-l-i-s-m (just kidding) C-o-l-o-n-i-a-l-i-s-m:

  • t = 0 (If you were thinking of colonization, there is still only 1 't' in the word.)

Interestingly, on one of my attempts it used python to count the number of t's and still ended up getting the "verbal" explanation wrong.

[–] jamesrandysghost@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

This might be worse then just giving the wrong answer....

[–] dangrousperson@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

funnily enough, usually I can't reproduce these, but this one I could. It's not quite as unhinged but still definetly very wrong

My result

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] daikiki@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

I can't believe Google missed that third 't' the first time around. So sloppy.

[–] Oka@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It took several tries but I got one that looped. Most of the time it gives the "there are 2" and puts random arrows.

This used to happen on chatgpt with "Is there a seahorse emoji". Here's a video explaining why this happens.

[–] Osan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Wait the seahorse emoji is not real???

[–] Redditisbollocks@feddit.uk 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And this shit is "taking people's jobs"

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[–] Guttural@jlai.lu 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is this actually real though?

[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Just tested with similar results, output was:

There are exactly 2 't's in the word 'colonialism'. C-o-l-o-n-i-a-l-i-s-m Would you like to check the spelling or character count of any other words? Let me know!

[–] Guttural@jlai.lu 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wow, I didn't think it was still that stupid

[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I don't think this particular genre of stupid will ever be fully fixed in LLMs to be honest, it's fairly structural

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 17 points 1 month ago

"Coloniatism" is my favourite

[–] ghurab@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interestingly, it would probably do a better job of writing a piece of code to count how many T's there are, and then reading output of that.

Yeah, it's pretty efficient at that. When the strawberry version was around, CGPT wrote some python and executed it after asking it programatically

[–] waterbird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I'll never tire of LLM aneurysms.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i seen without "thinking", it tells you if there is 2.
google's search ai does not have "thinking"
the looping thing i also seen before.

load more comments
view more: next ›