In my opinion, war is always full of crime. You can have crime without war, but you can't have war without crime. If by "war crime" you mean "Geneva convention", nobody follows that, either.
The winner prosecutes the loser, no exceptions.
In my opinion, war is always full of crime. You can have crime without war, but you can't have war without crime. If by "war crime" you mean "Geneva convention", nobody follows that, either.
The winner prosecutes the loser, no exceptions.
Not surprising most people who downvoted this is a .world user and piefed.world users
This is awesome never stop posting
this whole community is pure liberal rage bait isn’t it? I am not complaining but you guys really do like to trigger
We're gonna start cracking down on the rage-bait posting a little bit.
Seems to mostly be jank doing it for the rage bait, pre-jank it was definitely more pro-communist but less rage bait focused. Not necessarily a bad thing, but not how I would do it either.
i've had the same thought before. lol
The armchair propaganda and meme critic in me thinks this also conflates anti-imperial violence with imperial/settler-colonial violence and perhaps could better communicate the reality in some other way. Violence is necessary in struggles against violent oppression and resistance is not equivalent to ethnic cleansing, genocide, economic siege, or liberal coups.