this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
471 points (97.0% liked)

Comic Strips

24175 readers
1682 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. πŸ˜‡ Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. πŸ“½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. πŸ“‹ Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      βœ… Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. πŸ“¬ Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 πŸ–) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 πŸ–) will be removed.
  7. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      SΓ­, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss
  3. GPrime85

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zabadoh@ani.social 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That is one theory of how teleportation will work. Otherwise, you have a replication machine.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Star Trek has multiple stories about people being accidentally cloned by the transporter.

Which implies it is creating a copy.

Which implies it is destroying the original.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

In the TNG episode Lonely Among Us, while under the influence of an alien entity, Picard disintegrates himself into a nebula. The crew spend hours trying to get him back and are about to give up, when Troi senses Picard's disembodied presence nearby, and they are able to reconstitute his body from the transporter buffer, reuniting it with his mental energy.

So Star Trek has effectively confirmed the scientific existence of the soul, and the fact that it exists independently of the body, and that the soul can continue to exist without the body, and that the transporter can transport the soul without destroying it. So, no, the transporter is not a suicide machine.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

has effectively confirmed the scientific existence of the soul

Not at all, it's fiction.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Yes, they confirmed the objective existence of the soul within the context of their fictional universe, alongside faster than light travel, time travel, accessible parallel universes, stable wormholes, hand-held weapons that can vaporize a human being, and artificial general intelligence.

On the scale of science fiction hardness, Star Trek is somewhere between warm jello and cotton candy.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 1 week ago

scientifictionic*

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Star Trek transporters imply a lot of stuff, many of them contradictory.

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Transporters got nothing on holodecks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] scholar@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In fairness to Mr Tesla, his machine didn't kill. It made a perfect living duplicate. (The magician on the other hand...)

bro could have stopped at one copy and taken turns bowing like his nemisis did, but chose to die instead

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Never bought into the whole, "sleep is the same thing," argument. There's no period during which your brain functions cease during sleep. They slow during non-REM sleep, then reach near waking levels once you enter REM, but they never end. That's not remotely like having your entire body disassembled at molecular level and rebuilt somewhere else. One is essentially like a computer that's screen has gone idle while it performs background tasks. The other is like transferring all of your files to a new computer and then throwing the original into a woodchipper.

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Conciousness, what makes you, you, is not your brain functions. A "braindead" person usually still has a functioning part of the brain that regulates heartbeat. But the parts that are required for conciousness are gone.

The point behind the sleep analogy isn't that everything shuts down as in death, but your conciousness shuts down. It's more like a computer that has suspended it's processes to disk (aka hibernated) but then went into low-power mode instead of powering off completely. You can wake it back up and it restart these processes. You could even buy a new computer identical to the old one, copy the hard drive over bit by bit and have the new computer launch all the old processes. Are they then the same processes or different ones? A calculation that was suspended will pick up where it left of after all.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Conciousness, what makes you, you, is not your brain functions.

This is an extremely debatable assertion that scientists and philosophers will still be debating long after you and I are dead, but empirically, the evidence is pointing towards, "No, your consciousness is just a byproduct of that lump of meat in your skull." Phineas Gage, for example, discovered that a huge portion of what made him, him was actually his left-frontal lobe.

We could argue about conciousness, the soul, and the ship of theses for hours, and it would all still be opinion, but what is not opinion is this; your consciousness is being run on meat hardware, physical damage to or a chemical imbalance in that hardware will effect your consciousness, and it is constantly running processes, even when in sleep mode, until it is permanently shutdown. Based on that information, I would not let anyone disintegrate my brain, even if fhey reassembled it perfectly.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

my personal opinion is that instant (i.e. arbitrarily close to speed of light) teleportation machines could be built in theory, but doing so is really expensive and there's just no economical reason to do so.

for example, for fast travel, we already have aircraft and rockets. Yet nobody would use them to ship objects produced in china to europe, e.g. cars, if there's no time-critical component (i.e. food that spoils very quickly etc.). So the fastest way of travel is typically also the most expensive one, while cheaper modes of transport take more time.

Then, you can think of a teleportation device as a mode of transport where the speed approaches the speed of light. If our previous experience is anything to go by, that means that the cost of transport would increase enormously, and thus practically nobody would use it anyways. So that's the practical side to this thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

More like brainuppercut. Goddamn. Thankyou.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Explicitly don't work like that, the Transporter Problem Thought Experiment was "what if they worked like that"

But in Star Trek it's a streaming connection, kept in the Transporter Buffer

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ok, then explain Thomas Riker

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DankDingleberry@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

"the prestige: intensifies

[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago
[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
$me = "🧍"; 
$stillMe = & $me; 
unset($me);
print($stillMe); // wohoo, teleportation rocks!!!

$me = "🧍"; 
$copyOfMe = $me; 
unset($me); // πŸ’€ this sucks!!!
print($copyOfMe); // wait, what happened?
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

the reference never changed position in memory, so nothing actually happened during the teleportation process other than a re-labelling.

For real teleportation, that memory has to physically change position. I would do it gradually though, bit-by-bit, synchronized, and very fast.

The idea is that if you slow it down, you witness half-yourself getting destroyed exactly as you witness your other half getting created, with the only carry-over being a single 1 or a 0

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So teleportation is like going into the woodchipper feet first? Ok, now I slowly understand McCoys problems with that invention.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PixeIOrange@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Arent we kinda new every micromoment? I mean, the electrons powering our feelings and deeds are new every moment in time. The atoms we are made of are exchanged over time so we arent even the same matter after x many years... So we are never who we were before. Dying seems to be a part of living, not just the end...

Edit: even the Information saved in our bain change over time, they get more. And remembering things isnt correct every time so even the quality of information changes...

[–] TomArrr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whew. So that wasn't me on video last night. πŸ˜‰

[–] MathiasTCK@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

The crimes of Theseus

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes. I think this thought experiment ultimately boils down to "do you believe in a soul".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Try this:

[Repost of the comic from OP]

(I just opened the image in a separate browser)

[–] abacabadabacaba@infosec.pub 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a problem with infosec.pub instance, not with the post.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

what is this prestige that everyone keeps talking about?

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The Prestige is a movie where Wolverine and Batman fight in a battle of who is the best magician. David Bowie makes a teleportation machine for Logan to teleport across the entire theater to the shock of the audience.

Tap for spoilerBut we learn that the machine is not a teleporter, but a distance copier--the original Logan still remains on the pad while his copy stands across the expanse, beaming triumphantly down on the amazed audience. Logan rigs a trap door for his original self to fall through and drown every night, and every night, he never knows if he will be the one to die or the one to live.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Reading this was better than the actual movie.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But the movie also has Alfred!

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

bad taste in decoration, i guess. lmao

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Atomic teleportation where a pattern or parts are converted or reassembled = death

Quantum teleportation where particles exist in multiple locations states before collapsing into one… not so sure.

People are too dumb to get this reference.

Guess you could say it screws with them.

[–] nathanjent@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My theory is that the being who created the totems is borrowing the power of each soul's death and using that to recreate their body on the other side. There must be some minor difference in power that this being collects for itself. Even a small difference would be worth it at scale.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί