paywalled.
this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
87 points (96.8% liked)
Privacy
49766 readers
607 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Makes it a $70 mod
Not with an archived version: https://archive.ph/3O9mw
I get address not found.
Edit: I can access the site through Tor. Yay for censorship circumvention!
A .60 cent mod (tape) will do the same thing.
No it won't. There's a sensor that detects covering the LED.
This is the 3rd or 4th comment about this (across the Threadiverse) - why don't people ask why this costs $60 - and then go and find out? It's right fucking there in the article (before the paywall, even).
I'm going to be honest, I don't really give a shit about meta or their shitty glasses so I never bothered to look into it and I'm still not going to bother now either.
That being said I still appreciate the correction.
This is why I enjoy Lemmy; homie sticks to their point but thanks stranger for the correction. Respectful, I appreciate that.
This is a ~~Wendy's~~ ~~Reddit~~ Lemmy, Sir. We do not read articles past the headline.
[sad voice] I knooowww
Just cover it with tape
*Fediverse
I said Threadiverse because as far as I know none of the threads I looked at came from anywhere except Lemmy and Piefed.
So prying off the protective glass, drilling out the LED, and filling the void with resin, like this creep demonstrates. With electrical tape covering the LED, it seems creeps are required to block the camera sensor, for roughly one second after initiating video recording: as the photodiode value next to the LED is compared to brightness of the camera sensor; so by temporarily matching the two, Meta's plausible deniability mechanism can be bypassed.
I'd say the creep is the person who designed these in the first place
In particular, yes. But people seeking to secretly record others are also creeps in my book.