this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
232 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8842 readers
251 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A bill signed by Gov. Jeff Landry on Thursday mirrors other laws passed in red states amid a national effort to ban climate lawsuits against oil and gas companies.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 44 points 1 month ago

Doesn't that violate the equal protection clause?

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 29 points 1 month ago

Ah, stupid laws made by crooked men.

Ain't that America for you and me? Ain't that America? It's something to see.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 1 month ago

& kill on, GOP, kill on…

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These evil fuckers will see this planet burn if it lines their pockets.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 12 points 1 month ago

"Will"? Brother it is already happening in front of our very eyes. You are living through an extinction.

Welcome to the anthropocene.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

If climate change is fake, then it should be an easy for the defendents to win any lawsuits... right?

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does that mean that we can sue everyone who supported the bill? If we can't sue the ones turning the water bad, we can surely sue the ones carrying it, right?

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago

Nope. You cannot sue the legislative body for legislating. You can sue to block or nullify laws, but you can't sue individuals directly who are acting in their capacity as lawmakers.

[–] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

Would this allow for a rico case against those states?

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The damn law is on theor side. Time for war, then.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

One big problem: if enough states so this, there could be incentive and precedent for it to become a federal law in the future.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

Ah, yes. Perfect example of the State protecting people.

Guess it's time to sue the State for violating its own constitution