this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
492 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

86093 readers
3854 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 134 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Do you want authoritarianism, because that’s how you get it.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it's already here (globally, I mean). The beast is just now confident to show its face.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think they just don’t care because they know no one will do anything about it. Except protest, which is for losers.

[–] BrightCandle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They have been finding that pretty annoying too, they are banning as much of that as they can currently get away with even if its completely ineffective.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 85 points 3 weeks ago (23 children)

What can we do to stop this?

[–] nul42@lemmy.ca 58 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

My plan is to just never submit to an age verification. Change servers or self host if necessary. Worse comes to worse, we log off.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's the spirit.

I'll watch the system burn to the ground before I agree to privacy invasion.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

But it won't burn, it will be content to leave you behind.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

And so what? Many of us left Reddit because it killed 3rd party apps to force us onto its shitty mobile app. Did it burn without us? No, I doubt they even noticed. Does that make our departure meaningless? Also no, we built something better here.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So it isn't a choice between privacy invasion or watching it burn. It's a choice between privacy invasion and being left behind.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (8 children)

Left behind? If you've deemed a system to be so necessary that refusing to abandon your privacy at its behest means you are condemned to live in obsolescence, then you're only reinforcing the idea that we must surrender our rights for the benefits of the system.

I'm old enough to have lived in a world without the internet and if it's going in a direction that demands I surrender my right to privacy then I'll return to a life without the internet. I won't be alone and just like Lemmy I'm confident we'll build an alternative that aligns with our values.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] paulcdb@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

And what do you do when its a requirement to buy food, submit tax returns, get healthcare?

This is the problem people don’t understand. We have the same issue now in the UK. People think a voluntary system is easy ro just ignore until everything you rely and need forces you to starve or submit.

And its not going to stop at just age verification, it’ll continue until all you get to enjoy is maybe a loaf of bread, and some pond water! 🤦‍♂️

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

The impact that may have on navigating life seems significant. Have you even considered how that would actually work? Practically.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Voting won't do shit, the majority of people don't even see the problem with these bills.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And that defeatist mentality is the reason shit doesn’t change.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] zewm@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Start with local elections, then move up to provincial and finally national elections. Vote the people in that won’t do this.

Take it a step further and run for election yourself.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 45 points 3 weeks ago

The elites in every country are fighting together to keep us down, while we fight against each other.

There is a simple common problem.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 41 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Why does every government want age verification now, what's in it for them? Can't be one started and everyone saw it and thought that's a great idea let's introduce it too?

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 95 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Because it de facto requires everyone using the internet to provide their identity, which is something that gives authoritarian types a huge boner. Once there is no such thing as anonymous discourse, it becomes trivial to target/arrest/harass/brutalize dissenters or indeed anyone the current regime simply doesn't like.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 27 points 3 weeks ago

This amount of surveillance has a really disturbing track record in history. So assuming any politician backing this must be a fascist at heart is the correct approach. These politicians should not be in any position to make any of these decisions. They can't represent democracy when they declare themselves the enemies of it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s part of the data center push, Palantir, all of it. Centralized info storage so if anyone starts to push back anywhere they know exactly who and where. That and ads. The internet is too anonymous.

It’s the same set of billionaires. A little line between countries doesn’t mean much to them.

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's so blatant too, for anyone with half a brain. We're part of 5 Eyes, there's like 97 data centres being built or already in the late stages of approval here, and all of our internet traffic is controlled by 3 mega ISPs in moustache and glasses. We're already being tracked pretty thoroughly. Conservatives or Liberals, it doesn't matter when it comes to selling Canadians off to foreign corporate entities.

[–] KingKong33@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 weeks ago

Because the wealthy and the elite think we are on the cusp of a world with a massive labor surplus, no jobs, and nothing to follow it. There will be massive unrest, and so they want to lockdown the internet before that happens, so it will be easier to direct the angry horde at each other rather than at the top where all the issues are actually stemming from.

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 9 points 3 weeks ago

Because Meta and probably Bloomberg too, bribed them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Those in power hate the anonymous internet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ironic that this is being pushed by "liberals". They don't even bother to live up to their own failing ideology anymore.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Everyone in power wants it. They all say "It's for the children". State govs have already done it for adult sites.

[–] Timbo303@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago

This seems rather pointless from a business standpoint it will hurt many businesses geared towards children such as youtube kids even.

I think anyone thinking about enacting a law like this deserves to be impeached immediately the public have spoken against this and they are more valid arguments than for this.

  1. Your ID data can be hacked such as what happened with persona. I don't consider uploading your ID unless you must for a bank, phone provider, government entity, or work. No other business should ever need this info in my opinion.

  2. Selfie option will just fuel artificial intelligence. In my opinion they need to outlaw the use of scrapping age verification selfie images for ai.

[–] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If I hear anything else about C-34 I'm going to slap the benzos out of Jordan Peterson

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 12 points 2 weeks ago

I tried warning thee Canadians months ago. The assault is upon the common man. These bastards are going to enslave us and run off with a bunch of cash.

[–] rogsson@piefed.social 12 points 3 weeks ago

Fucking idiots everywhere

[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Rule34: don't lock down the Internet

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Serious question, can we start building local infrastructure for our own internet via meshtastic and those technologies?

[–] d3vnu1l@programming.dev 7 points 2 weeks ago

You should check out reticulum if you haven't already. More use cases than just messaging.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] webkitten@piefed.social 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Really love how supposed left of centre governments are falling in line to these "age verification" bills, which are bankrolled by anti-LGBT far right groups designed to push LGBTQ kids from public life.

Also love how none of them even stop to think that this was a possibility for why these bills were being pushed when the people pushing them have flat out admitted it.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (27 children)

Yes. Liberals aren't your friends. They appropriated queer politics to do exactly this. People have been warning against this for decades.

They are not being tricked into doing this, this is the second time the Liberal party alone has tried this along with other proposals from Cons and other internet authoritarianism policies like lawful access. They know what it is for and they understand the consequences of who it'll effect. It just so happens queer people (racialized people, indigenous people, disabled people, etc.) are also disproportionately politically active and challenging to liberal capitalism, and liberals have had an exceedingly difficult time shutting that down online through censorship alone.

It is not only distortive but also dangerous to accept that this is out of stupidity and ignorance. They are attacking us. "Elbows up," awards for the people who voted for Carney because they didn't think a minority govt with a stronger NDP presence was possible.

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TerdFerguson@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

WE NEED

::: spoiler


online age verification :::

TO PROTECT CHILDREN

load more comments
view more: next ›