this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
427 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

85683 readers
4334 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Then it didn’t make 13 billion….. and it didn’t lose 21 billion.

It lost 8 billion. That’s how math works.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 8 points 5 days ago

You're not wrong, but neither is the title. That's just how business accounting works. Ultimately, it's still the same conclusion ($8 billion loss)

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Altman is such a miserable cunt.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

he pretty much is created by thiel, so yes he is. since ALtman met his husband at one of thiels "pool" parties. just like how he plucked vance out of obscurity from yale. he does love his gay puppets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 78 points 6 days ago (4 children)
[–] scottmeme@sh.itjust.works 47 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Looks like the shovel seller is making quite a bit

[–] artyom@piefed.social 18 points 6 days ago

Indeed, they're the only ones. Along with Samsung, SK Hynix, AMD, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is interesting. Nvidia cashing in while they can. They'll come back to us consumers when/if all this AI stuff collapses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mojo_raisin@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wow, I like that "spent since page load".

I want a ticker like that "Lemmy pages since bong load".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 39 points 6 days ago (2 children)

"So what did you do with the $100,000?"

"I invested it and turned it into sixteen THOUSAND dollars. "

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

OpenAI:

"I DON'T NEED MONEY! I DON'T EVEN LIKE IT! I JUST WANNA THROW IT AWWWAAAAAAY!!"

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago

im betting sam altman asked claude instead of CHAPGPT to how much to invest and where.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago

First thing I thought of lmao.

Do you know how to make a small fortune with AI?

First, start with a big fortune...

[–] abc@suppo.fi 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

That's a weird way of saying that they had a net loss of $8 billion. Are you trying to imply that this is somehow extraordinary for a growth company? How do you figure that?

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 days ago

Bah that's baby numbers compared to what "private space" will accomplish!

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago

Vibe stocks

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 3 points 5 days ago

Yep, defo not a bubble.

[–] ScruffyDucky@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (12 children)

You have to spend money to make money :)

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This is what you call a succesful business man /s

[–] skankhunt42@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

If someone gave me 21billion I bet I could only lose 1 billion, return the 20, and never be seen again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What's their op ex though? I feel like there must be a sizable portion of that which isn't actually necessary to keep the service up.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

So the the operating expense was greater than their revenue from operations by about 2, but it seems like they’re minimizing it by hiding the cost of some of the compute inside marketing and training costs. This is something that a few AI companies in China have been caught doing to make it seem like they’re doing better than they are. So they could be incinerating money at an even faster rate than they just admitted.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›