this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
121 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12081 readers
537 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Elbows up," alright. To the rich paying their fair share, the environment, public services, pharmacare, (edit: digital privacy,) ...

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago

We need more bans instead of taxes on things that are causing the climate catastrophe

[–] SnowzSan@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Carney is a clown. Still better than Polieve, but a clown nonetheless. I hate that we're essentially powerless to stop this unless you're willing to throw your life away doing something drastic but necessary.

Everyday we inch closer and closer to political chaos and civil unrest.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As someone stuck in the US right now, I really do implore you or someone to do the drastic. It's over otherwise.

I practice with my guns multiple times a week, but am not there yet. But want to be prepared nonetheless.

[–] bitwise@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Why do you think they want to backdoor all encryption? Can't organize if they know who's talking about what.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I say anyone with more than $10m in worth cannot vote or run for office.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Agreed. And maybe it also shouldn't be someone's first job out of school.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Young people's decisions will affect them longer than old people.

I'd rather an age cap than an age minimum.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Although my own comment was more about slowing the roll of people who go into politics as a career choice from the get-go (red flag imo), there are arguments for having both minimum and maximum ages. 25-ish to 65-ish sounds reasonable. (I also think there should be baseline and follow-up tests for both empathy and cognitive capacity.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 3 points 2 days ago

I don’t know about all the age rules for each position (all 18+?) but I think 25 is a good minimum age for an elected rep, higher for PM…30-35? I favor young blood in politics, but below 25… please go play and enjoy your childhood haha.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They don't need to do either of those things. They just buy the legislation they want.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 1 points 2 days ago

Guess we gotta chop their head off.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Carneys friends and family started complaining.

I'm not sure has friends. It was probably his sponsors.