this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
368 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

20537 readers
1698 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 13 points 16 hours ago

Imagine going to a lab, taking that out of your chemical drawer, and just yanking it into your mouth in front of everyone

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 53 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Man I don't know if I could eat out of that canister.

Its so ingrained as "CHEMICAL, DO! NOT! EAT!" In my mind.

[–] starik@lemmy.today 19 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

That doesnt geht any reaction from me, as I dont use it. It's the USA safety sign, right?

[–] starik@lemmy.today 9 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes. Health, fire, reactivity, and other. Each rated 0-5.

[–] Redjard@reddthat.com 4 points 7 hours ago

0/5 health? You want to kill me?

[–] tae_glas@slrpnk.net 36 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

the part of the label specifying "100% edible" really doesn't help with suspicions either 🤣

[–] Janx@piefed.social 1 points 7 hours ago

So are the stickers they put on bananas. And the banana peel itself! Doesn't mean I'm interested in eating them...

[–] 5ha99y@lemmus.org 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If you are a REAL lab rat, you don't really care. The stories I've heard of lab rats (including my own accidental stuff), I learned they don't really care at some point. They often say "Well, I must already have cancer, so what!".

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 6 points 21 hours ago

I mean... with that attitude and behaviour towards safety rules... probably yes.

And yeah, nothing worse for teaching students proper and safe handling of chemicals than old technicians. "we never used gloves to pour THF out of this 10L vessel!" "ah just don't breath in too strongly and if you feel funny, go to the window and get a quick breath of fresh air".

[–] ODuffer@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

Nile red bought some and made horrible cookies. Turns out the chocolate was like a decade old.

[–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] CatAssTrophy@safest.space 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's a certified reference standard for scientific research, not food. The chocolate isn't even like expensive by the standards of NIST standardized food standards, e.g. NIST3287 blueberry is about half the price of the chocolate, but for 25g vs 455g.

[–] helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for the explanation.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 12 hours ago

if you get bored:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crjxpZHv7Hk

he makes an awful cookie out of decade old NIST standard ingredients.

[–] Korval@lemmy.today 16 points 20 hours ago

We get eye drops by mail from a local specialty vet pharmacy. For our first few deliveries, the mailer contained one plastic bag with a prescription bottle and a second baggie with two green mints. Or rather, I assume they were mints. They were green like mints, but the bag wasn't labeled. I don't think they were individually wrapped, but I don't exactly remember. I'm sure they were thank you mints, but I also couldn't quite bring myself to eat an unlabeled item from a lab. They don't do it anymore, and that makes me kind of sad.

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 41 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

"To be consumed by amazing scientists". So, not me then.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 23 hours ago

Nonsense, grab a handful smartypants. You deserve it

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Wait.

Is... does your lab setup just include this as, like... you're just in very fancy box with a treat dispenser for when you perform well?

Or is management maybe using the paradigm of treats are always available at regular intervals, unless you fuck something up, then, no treats?

Are we running a negative punishment or positive reward kind of lab here?

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

i think this is a container of ideal substance.

it’s kinda like there are a set of weights that is the master weight for metric, that all others are calibrated against.

this would be the ideal substance considered swiss chocolate, for use in verifying machines and other tests are calibrated to this substance.

from what i remember about these. they all taste terrible. but are technically edible.

[–] CatAssTrophy@safest.space 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

They tend to be labeled as "Intended for research use only. Not for human consumption." not as "To be consumed by amazing scientists."

It's actually a promotional item for the ideal substances from Sigma-Aldrich, though.

https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/campaigns/chocolate-raffle

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

... Ok.

That ... actually makes sense.

I must note that, not being a chemist or lab tech of any kind, my initial read of 'ideal substance' was platonic ideal... and I was going to ask some questions about that, but... not what you meant.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

right. they are, as i understand it, chemically ideal, created of chemically “ideal” base ingredients, cooked at exacting temperatures and pressures, for exacting times. purified of anomalies at every step.

i imagine they taste like it too

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Yeah haha!

I had to uh, frame shift my context for vocab... yes, that makes much more sense than... attempting to create a philosophically perfect example of a swiss chocolate, in a lab, hahaha!

How do we empirically measure a qualia, anyway?

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago

An 'unsuitable for dogs and cats' label might be apt

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 8 points 23 hours ago

is there swiss chocolate in there or swiss chocolate flavoured edibles?

[–] TheGiantKorean@lemmy.today 4 points 20 hours ago

Apparently this isn't for purchase anywhere. This would make a great gift for a science friend!

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

How to keep your kids out of your snacks.

[–] the_beber@feddit.org 3 points 20 hours ago

I found a blog post about this. The bottle in this particular image doesn‘t look like the one in the blog post, but it‘s a similar idea.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t think cocoa can grow in Switzerland…

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago

They've got some good dairy cows though, for the "milk" part of "milk chocolate"

No no no no no no no. Absolutely not!