this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
584 points (99.3% liked)

politics

30180 readers
3539 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) says New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani is going to have to smooth things over with congressional Democrats after backing several progressive candidates who ousted incumbents during Tuesday’s primary elections.

Asked if Mamdani’s endorsements were making him “enemies” with Democrats in Washington, D.C., Jeffries told CNN that he and Mamdani “strongly” disagreed over his primary picks ahead of Election Day.

Now, according to Jeffries, the mayor has serious “work to do in terms of the conversations that he’s going to have with members of Congress moving forward.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fira@lemmy.today 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Fuck the DNC. #MamdaniForPresident

Luigi President, Mandani can be governor of NY state, as hes not US born.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

What work to do? He's mayor of NYC, he doesn't need to explain shit to jefferies or any other national congressperson.

[–] AlSweigart@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 hours ago

Vote blue no matter who, Jeffries.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 43 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Now, according to Jeffries, the mayor has serious “work to do in terms of the conversations that he’s going to have with members of Congress moving forward.”

More like establishment Dems are scared they'll finally have to do work at all. Why don't you write a strongly worded letter to Mamdani? Or is that too harsh an action given that's the same level of opposition you've had against Trump?

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 20 points 5 hours ago

Jeffries and Booker are whores. AIPAC owned whores who would 100% pull a Clarence Thomas for enough money.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 6 hours ago

congress serves the people, not their dem friends. The People

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 35 points 7 hours ago

Jeffries is a dead man walking. I hope his ass gets primaried in the future.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The idiot centrists should be the ones patching things up over their epicly failed leadership, lack of a platform for their voters, and genocide support.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 15 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Funny how centrists don't appear to be jumping at the chance to find "common ground" with actual progressive politicians.

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

The only isle they're reaching across is the one to their donors.

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 42 points 7 hours ago

Hey Jeffy, get fucked.

[–] GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world 26 points 7 hours ago

U mad, bro?

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 65 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Mr Jeffries,

I am appalled that you, or any Democrats, think that you get to pick who it is that we, the people, vote for. You are a representative for us. You need to smooth things over with the American people because these others were voted in not because Mamdani is a cult of personality, but because they are doing and saying things the people like and want.

When you and the party can do something successfully, such as codify LGBTQ rights (I.e., gay marriage, trans rights, etc), eliminate corporate government influence, ensure proper health care, and a laundry list of other things then maybe we can take you and your “preferred choices” seriously. Until then, watch change happen from the people that actually have to be in the trenches dealing with all of the American government’s fuckery. Please sit down, kindly shut up, and do your job of representing the people’s needs and not presenting your next potential colleague.

Sincerely,

An American Voter in Illinois

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I am so tempted to send this as an actual email to his team along with a link to the attached article.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I hope you do. And I would like to see the form letter that you receive in response.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 29 points 9 hours ago

How long did Jeffries wait to endorse Mamdani as the NYC mayoral candidate?

Maybe it stings that Mamdani's successes so far have come despite support from Democrat leadership. Just shows what taking your job as a public servant seriously can do.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 43 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Ah yes the house Democrats known for their fervor, backbone and hard fought results.

You can't even threaten an enemy properly and you are gonna threaten a fellow Democrat? Fuckin traitors. And they would be dealt with accordingly.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

If Jeffries is annoyed with you, you probably did something right. If your incumbents are just there to tow the party line, kiss corporate ass, kiss Netanyahu's ass, and give, at most, flaccid resistance to the Republican agenda before bending to their will, they deserve to lose their seats. The few progressives we have need more numbers. I'll happily sacrifice a few milquetoast party dems for progressives with a backbone and an agenda for change.

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago

Hey Hakeem, tough titties shitbird. Read the room, your time has past.

[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

no the incumbent dems should be scared, very scared. he just showed the rest of the country how to take them down. It's time to get to work.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

There are 2 parts to taking back the government. The GOP has to be stopped, so voting Dem is a necessity. We have a 2-party system, so anyone who isn't voting blue is contributing to the problem.

"But the Dems aren't what we want them to be"

That's what primaries are for, and Mandami is the perfect case study. Primaries are where the most important elections are determined.

That being said, I live in an area of Texas where Dems simoly aren't going to win, so I'm actually a registered Republican most years. I vote the in the Republican primaries for the least-crazy among them, but then vote blue in the general election.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Very tactical of you, tho that's a hell of an uphill battle

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm in a deep-enough red area that I simply have to deal with Republicans. And most of them are perfectly nice people until the Fox News switch gets flipped in their heads.

It's crazy. There will be a bunch of perfectly nice ladies gathering supplies for the food bank and blankets for the poor, and then something switches and they'll start talking about how the Demoncrats want to steal the election so they can use tax money to pay to have illegals get hormone blockers so they can rape Christian girls.

load more comments
view more: next ›