this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
163 points (97.1% liked)

politics

30960 readers
2243 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 76 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Or maybe people prefer candidates who aren't corporate shills, and those get endorsed by Mamdani.

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago

This. Thank you.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

The culture warlords only know tribal identity sportsball politics.

The concept of empathy and supporting kind people does not benefit them financially, therefore it is invalid.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah, he's just more in touch with the average voter on the left and everyone's tired of milquetoast centrists

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

That statement massively undercuts the candidates that he endorsed. Brad Lander has absolutely been putting in the work, and these candidates are all much more than just ‘Mamdani’s candidates.’ Fantastic that he endorsed them, but give credit to the candidates.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is interesting how Mamdani has much longer coattails than AOC and that he is participating in primaries almost immediately.

It is a great strategy and I hope it pays off, but it feels like Mamdani is moving the needle a lot more.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's cuz he's a man, the patriarchy still calls the shots unfortunately.

[–] themoken@startrek.website 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sexism might be an easy answer, but let's not forget that AOC is a rep with a small district, and got around 100k votes. Mamdani represents millions of New Yorkers and curried more than a million votes in his election. Mayor is also a much broader executive position than being one of 438 reps.

Point being, Mamdani's election/position comes with a lot more mandate than AOC's, regardless of gender.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Truly, I wonder how much AOC paved the way for mamdani

[–] themoken@startrek.website 6 points 2 months ago

AOC had to walk so Mamdani could run. Not only proving DSA candidates were electable, but also that they could actually do the job by being pragmatic (for better or worse).

[–] GodofLies@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Massive props to their communications/media team. They are hands down the best I've seen so far.