this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
317 points (92.7% liked)

Technology

59219 readers
3145 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is so strange to me. I guess people enjoy being ripped off and getting less and less value for their money.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vodkasolution@feddit.it 136 points 9 months ago (7 children)

That proves their recent moves are not perceived by people as unfair, contrary to what "the common web" said

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 63 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah I guess. It's very shocking to me, but people have spoken...

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 60 points 9 months ago (4 children)

You can't trust people. People listen to Cold Play and voted for the Nazi Party.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 38 points 9 months ago

People. What a bunch of bastards.

[–] silverhand@reddthat.com 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What's wrong with Coldplay?

[–] Cyclist@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Nothing, I think the point is that people will listen to a band that may have left of center sensibilities (I don't know about Coldplay in particular) then vote the opposite. A great example is the video of the old white couple, wearing thin Blue line flags, dancing to Killing In The Name Of by Rage Against The Machine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

If you gave humanity the ultimatum that they can continue paying what they're currently paying, or subscribe to nothing for a year but be rewarded with the same price to access all movies and tv series ever created, via a single service, for the rest of their lives... I'm willing to bet more than 2/3 of the human population would cave and re-subscribe within a couple of months.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LetMeEatCake@lemm.ee 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'd agree, though I wonder how much of this is how appealing consumers find the competition? None of them seem to be making major inroads at the moment. The biggest competition is also raising prices, nullifying the competitive penalty Netflix would face from that move.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It just proves that avergae people want their TV and don't give a fuck about how much it costs.

My wife is a perfect example: We leached off my mom's Netflix for years. I don't really care, we have Plex that I manage and Netflix blows, so it's all her. Mom ended up cancelling with the latest price hike. Brother and I took bets. My wife lasted 36 hours before making her own account. I lost my bet.

[–] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Same here. I set up a Servarr stack and showed everyone in my house how to use Jellyseer to pick shows. I set up Jellyfin on all of their devices as well as the common TV. It works wonderfully well and they can download anything.

So what do I see when I look over their shoulder to see what they're using? Netflix and Prime Video. SMH.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yup, happens every time. Even with everything working and that my wife can pick her own shows to automatically download, I think it's the waiting that does it, because God forbid you have to wait 5-10 minutes. Also too, I can see the appeal in browsing someone else's library and watching something on a whim.

[–] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, and I think there is some inertia and cognitive load at play. Going to Jellyseer to find a show, figuring out what's good, committing to the download, waiting for the download and then switching over to Jellyfin is a bit more cognitively involved than the basically mindless browsing you can do on Netflix. I see it with my kids with Tiktok as well. Tiktok looks even more passive with the algorithm just feeding you non-stop, constantly varying content.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago

People will pay for things that they perceive to be unfair deals.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 85 points 9 months ago (2 children)

A lot of it is familiarity. I begged my parents to cancel Netflix, especially since they complain about the programming (or lack thereof); I pointed out that they could try another streaming service for a month, and then if they really hated it, then they could just go back to Netflix. But they wouldn't even entertain the possibility. They're afraid of change.

And Netflix is making bank on that.

[–] sealhaslupus@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

At some point they made a decision to change from something else to Netflix, so perhaps they’re not afraid of change but might need a compelling reason to use a different service?

Could be an opportunity for you to educate them on what options are available and why that will benefit them long term.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He could just pickup another service for a month or two and share the account with them. I know most others are planning on cracking down, but none have so far afaik.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Their competition sucks big ass, too. I guess branding matters in this case. For example, once you watched the classic HBO TV series (The Sopranos, The Wire…), you don't need it anymore. The others have even less going on.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I cancelled around the time the password policy changed. I found less and less compelling shows to watch and the old favorites like the office moved on to other services.

It's a bummer they aren't facing consequences for their price hikes and other shenanigans .

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 13 points 9 months ago

I guess someone else is paying for our cancelled subs now. Hope they enjoy their shitty service.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 11 points 9 months ago

Yep it's disappointing that they aren't getting punished for their bullshit. They'll never get any money from me anyways.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ibex@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And just like that we were guaranteed another price increase.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

We? I’m not giving them anything

[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

Fucking weak. People are just begging to be screwed.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I can’t say I’m terribly surprised. Many people are too lazy to pirate and the alternative services are also pricy now. Cable and satellite companies did the same stuff before streaming, and most people were too hooked on the product to abandon it.

The comments in a Reddit and Lemmy post are not indicative of broader behavior. Just because everyone in the comments says they’re bailing, that doesn’t mean Netflix is screwed. This is a bubble.

[–] thrawn@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

With massive businesses in the US, I operate on one very simple assumption: Americans will take anything. Low quality products, price hikes, evil behavior— nearly 100% of the time, it doesn’t matter. Americans will take it lying down.

Very rarely, there will be significant pushback. Usually this leads to a minor walking back, but the thing that was tried will probably be tried again. Among hundreds of “this is now worse” decisions, maybe two or three are actually significantly haltered or occasionally truly stopped every year.

I don’t even really blame them. American consumers have been treated like absolute shit for so long, and the draw of escapism on TV is probably hard to resist.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cmrn@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (4 children)

And yet this is 2 posts down from an article about their price hikes and increase in ads coming up.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 9 points 9 months ago

I guess people love that shit... \o/

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] shirro@aussie.zone 23 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Growth of a few million subscribers is nothing for a company the size of Netflix and there could be all sorts of creative accounting going on.

Executives patting themselves in the back to justify bonuses is self serving bullshit. Quality and value build long term brand profitability but that is too hard for MBAs. Cost cutting and screwing customers is all they know. In a few years people will be asking what the fuck happened to Netflix.

I was a relatively early adopter of Netflix before it was available in my country and used it via VPN back when Netflix had more to gain by allowing that. They made some interesting shows that justified the very affordable price. Now there is more content and most is crap. I rotated subscriptions for the last year but I am hard out now. And ad supported tiers don't fix it for me because I would rather eat shit than watch them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Vendul@feddit.de 21 points 9 months ago

Shame on those customers.

[–] _sideffect@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Ugh... Hate to see this

[–] SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I've been cycling through them a few months at a time. When it gets harder and harder to find something interesting on, say, Netflix, I cancel and sign up for, say, HBO, then a few months later Disney+, rinse and repeat.

I refuse to pay for more than one at a time because I'm not watching more than one at a time. And when I go back to any of them after many months away, there will be new programmes in their catalogue.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rolling_resistance@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (6 children)

This would be strange if Netflix didn't have enough of easily accessible good content.

When after finishing work we want to watch “a movie”, it's much easier to choose a Netflix recommendation than to do a half an hour reasearch online and then wait for the movie to be downloaded.

Now add to this time, energy, and expertise needed for looking up and trying pirating options, figuring out technical aspects, paying for a VPN, doing maintenance… Very few can and are willing to do all that.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 16 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Yeah but the problem is, I was watching a lot of really bad movies on Netflix, just because they didn't have anything I wanted to watch. So I was sitting there, feeling bored or annoyed or disgusted by the shit movies... I actually felt depressed by what I watched even!

So I was like... I'm paying for this, and I feel like shit most of the time when watching it.

No more.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (10 children)

The people who don't know how I understand completely. But honestly people who have the know-how are underestimating how easy it has got. I can torrent a movie at a much higher quality than Netflix will even stream to my PC and do it all within 5 minutes.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] firadin@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

But does Netflix even have good movies? Like I think it'd be easier to do exactly that but on HBO Max or Disney Plus, or a TV show on Hulu.

[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Weird. I can find and download a movie in a couple of minutes. It's almost as easy as learning how to download and navigate Netflix.

Pirating movies has never been easier, but wait there's more, you can just stream them for free too.

There's even places you can buy a box for a one time fee, and have all channels and services free. Or get a subscription that offers every service and channel on earth.

It's so easy my 80 yr old father can do it.

There's no maintenance, no technical expertise needed, you don't even need a VPN.

The only thing Netflix really offers is convenience and legality.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe this is the people telling the other competitors to fuck off with their own streaming services. Maybe they think staying loyal to just one of them, things can go back to resemble how it was +5 years ago.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 8 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I don't think any company that becomes shit ever goes back to being not shit again...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I’m confused by this password debacle. I am on my brother’s (US) family plan, but I’ve been living abroad the whole time. Nothing has changed for me at all. Does this mean there are some exemptions, that the crackdown just hasn’t hit my brother yet, or that he’s paying more now on my behalf without my knowing?

[–] AnomanderRake@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago

Netflix does let you add "guest" users in different households now, although It could be it just hasn't hit you yet. When they announced the password crackdown it stopped Netflix working in my second household, but we just logged out and in and we haven't been "blocked" since.

It seems for the initial debacle they blocked loads of accounts but I don't know how often they do a ban wave or if they just figured the original announcement would get more people to buy subscription's (which seems to have worked).

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

We have 6 streaming services at home. Most of them have one or two accounts, meaning they were never used. We are five and most of us are well versed in traversing the seas and with the exception of my father, we all understand spoken and written English pretty well. Whenever I bring the "Why don't we drop off A, B and C that are not being used right now" to the table, they all react badly. I dont understand.

[–] V4sh3r@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

I see two approaches that you can take.

  1. instead of focusing on what you are taking away. Focus on what you can do with the money instead. Telling them that they can have a new TV with that money is a lot more motivation to say yes than taking something away.
  2. Do the scream test. Just cancel everything and wait for someone to scream about not having a services and resubscribe. Repeat every 6 months or so.
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nostradiel@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Yeah, but they don't mention how many they lost during price uprising, so I'd say it somehow equals.

[–] WallEx@feddit.de 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I would guess the perception is that its still the best streaming service.

Also the crackdown in account sharing is helping.

[–] MudMan@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago (17 children)

Yeah, I thought we had figured this out after Twitter. Or Reddit.

FWIW, I did not remove my subscription, but I did respond to the recent price bump by downgrading to a lower tier, and we're still sharing it (if they ever shut us down for that I'm certainly not paying a second sub, but so far the locations are close enough and it's used rarely enough in one of them that it's never been an issue).

The big thing that I did was to go back to physical media and home streaming. Boycotts won't work, but that? That might. At least it'll make it less likely for physical media to be fully eliminated as an option.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›