this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
1024 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

85947 readers
4813 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

It's such a hilariously dumb idea I hope the tech bros sink millions into it.

Lets make a data center we can't maintain, upgrade or access for any practical reason. Waiting for the suggestions to put them in geostationary orbits so that way their latency is even higher but going to struggle staying powered when in Earth's shadow. Or get put in the Earth-Sun L1 so they always have solar power but now have to have significant more radiators on top of even MORE latency beyond beyond the moon's orbit.

It makes sense if we have a space elevator and also invert the way most of the physics of data centers work.

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 16 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The "good idea" isn't the data centers but the stock pumping. You propose something insanely difficult and expensive (also hopelessly impractical and stupid in this case) and because it is so difficult and expensive you claim you can monopolize the market if you succeed which is the ultimate dream of every capitalist but you just need some insane amount of investment to get there. Then when the money runs out you go back and ask for more and exploit sunk cost fallacy. All the while valuations increasing. It is an amazing way for already rich scammers to get much, much richer than could happen in a sane economy and slurp up huge amounts of capital that otherwise could have gone into more productive endeavors.

Obviously in any well regulated economic system this shit would be subject to some proper oversight to protect the interests of the majority, particularly all the people whose pensions and livelihoods are at risk when this all goes to shit.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 6 hours ago

isnt thats what all the tech conferences are for, to hype the investors up. how long can they keep up with the peddling on those conferences? everytime a new con is our hub , its almost always a different usage of AI, so they need to come up with new "ideas" each time.

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Just billionaire psychosis like where ai got to where it is to begin with. Obviously they’re all visionaries leading the world to a better place…

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 7 hours ago

Conway's law strikes again!

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I had a conversation with a colleague of mine about this. He believed that Musk's decision to merge xAI and SpaceX was truly because of the potential of datacenters in space. I was unable to convince him that the logistics of this would be a nightmare and that this was just a way to make the Twitter buyout SpaceX's problem.

[–] chewypoops@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Imagine launching that scale of infrastructure, loaded full of Nvidia chips that'll be outdated in like 2 years.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I skimmed the title for a sec and thought "what's wrong with orbital stations?" before realizing the utter stupidity that graced my vision.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

Right?! The particular rendition show is pretty remarkable. Like I'd question it as a small one off game asset

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Do we have a way to transfer heat into rock, because I'm thinking lunar data centers.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Convection works with all matter, just that we normally associate it with air. There is the question of conductivity.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago

Fluids. Convection. Isn't going to work well with rocks.

[–] green_link@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

what is metal if not just concentrated bits of specific rock?

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (4 children)

At medium earth orbit the minimum delay will be about 67ms (250 ms to 600+ ms for geostationary orbits) for LEO it is 25-50 ms. The average ground network ping on a good day is 1ms-20ms.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

thats not even the worst problem, they would have to deal with potential orbital debris, solar radiation, flares.

[–] Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And the biggest problem dumping waste heat, the only way to do it in a vacuum is via blackbody radiation.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

ceos arnt exactly bright, they think space is "cold" so they assume the heat would radiate into nothingness.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 3 points 13 hours ago

Looks like dialup's back on the menu boys!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If and only if someone is insane enough to develop off-planet manufacturing with the bulk of the raw materials originating from somewhere in deep space, e.g. asteroid mining, putting data centers in space might be useful for problems that demand intensive compute and can work with extreme latency.

Then again that's like saying inventing the airplane would have been a good strategy for Neanderthals to find better firewood.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›