this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
216 points (99.1% liked)

politics

30272 readers
2415 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 52 minutes ago)
  • "Donald Trump approved just 23 percent of disaster funding requests from states with Democratic governors and Democratic senators, while at the same time, over roughly the same period, states with Republican governors and Republican senators had their [requests approved] 89 percent of the time."

  • "The people of Michigan are in good hands with Trump-endorsed Mike Rogers, who is running for U.S. Senate, and John James for governor." "I just spoke with Congressman Tom Tiffany, who has my complete and total endorsement for governor, and informed him that the great state of Wisconsin has been approved to be given $22.6 million in its disaster declaration request."

Trump is openly framing disaster aid as a political favor tied to his endorsed candidates. he's holding disaster aid hostage untill the state does what trump wants so he can make the senator look like the hero... Instead of creating a system where everyone gets equal protection, he's saying if you don't vote for me, you get less protection... This also creates a dangerous new quid pro quo for how states or voters act, supporting his candidates means they'll get the help they need and suffer less, opposing them means they'll have to pay the price... They also mislead voters saying that candidates (like Tiffany or Rogers) directly secured the aid, because in reality, the decision rests with the federal government, Trump himself...

  • "We should be expecting an all-of-government approach in the coming weeks and months. [...] What we can expect in the coming weeks is a federal government that is focused exclusively on helping Republicans win elections. Period, full stop."

So federal agencies (FEMA, ICE, HHS, etc.) will be put to work to influence elections. So we can expect more aid approved to swing states with competitive races (Michigan, Wisconsin) while denying and withholding it to blue states. They will try potential deployment to manufacture crises (immigration "surges") to rally Republican voters, and strategically deploying health resources and programs, announcing new funding, grants and initiatives to boost the image of republican GOP candidates in swing districs (RFK Jr. campaigning in those same key districts). Even if the programs were already planned or not uniquely tied to Republican efforts, it’s about manufacturing the image of the GOP as the party that "delivers".
They literally use all government resources to punish democratic states, and reward republican states. Sounds authoritarian. I thought power was a tool to make lives better for everyone, instead of power being the endgoal and making sure none can challenge him lol

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 22 points 7 hours ago

This was the plan since day 1. Don’t act surprised now or when there are armed guards at polling stations. Stay safe and informed everyone.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 66 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

The only poll that matters is the one in November. Let's hope people show up this time.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Voting is only one way of civil participation.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 31 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

While I agree with the underlying sentiment, this is actually false.

The primaries NOW for upcoming Senate and Congress seats are just as, if not more important than the inevitable outcome in November.

If you need any proof, just look at the outsized coverage every single DSA-linked candidate has gotten since winning their respective primaries.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

The primaries are the battle that matters. The Democratic establishment is the enemy.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, I voted about a month ago.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's funny that it's producing a Barbara Streisand effect, which by the way what story was she trying to bury? It kind of got buried by the South Park nonsense

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I’m old enough to remember this happening, it was her attempts to remove a photo from a coastline survey that depicted her home off the Internet:

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, I was in middle school so I didn't really catch the news parts of that story, I just thought South Park was cool because it was a cartoon with bad words and Kenny always died. It's too bad they became libertarians but at least they take the piss out of Trump

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

The writers of south park are on our side.

[–] dudesss@piefed.ca 19 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

If you don't vote, your opinion about politics doesn't matter

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2 points 13 minutes ago

If you don't vote, you're voting for the winner.

That's why 2/3rds of Americans voted for Trump.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

If you choose not to vote rather. I know plenty of people who can't, mostly because they are young. The others haven't gotten all of their rights restored after a felony conviction or are noncitizens. But if I use your rule, I get to ignore all of the rest of the world regarding politics because they didn't vote in my local elections

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Oh yeah? So the democrats refusing to save the country matters then? Fuck all the way off. I do vote, but you are way off base here, the problem is not a lack of shaming, but a lack of populism in the party.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 26 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

vote, people…don’t be we the sheeple

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 hours ago

That's right! I only vote so I can bitch about it. In my county not voting red is like throwing a hotdog down a hallway to fill it up.

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 8 points 10 hours ago

…and it won’t cost him a single vote.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 7 points 10 hours ago

“Trump plainly says dumb scheme”

FTFY