this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
231 points (99.6% liked)

Android

34456 readers
493 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the Android community on Lemmy. Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/67481084

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 135 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

updated its mobile apps to no longer support GrapheneOS

This is not accurate. They updated the app to actively block GrapheneOS and other third-party Android builds.

The distinction is critical; unsupported combinations often work.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

They updated the app to use the Play Integrity API, which GOS does not meet.

Not that it means anything, of course. GOS is far more secure than Google's laughable excuse of a certification.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

They updated the app to use the "Play Integrity[sic] API," which actively blocks GOS.

"Does not meet" implies there is something reasonable GOS could do to "fix" it, which untrue and misleading. The malice on Google's and Volkswagen's part is an important part of the story.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That is until the official Motorola partnership happens with GoS and Motorola. It's the missing piece for integrity verification as of current listed requirements on Google's documentation. They needed to have first class support from a major OEM. Looking forward to seeing how Google will change that maliciously. This includes attestation.

[–] EvenOdds@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago

The pessimist in me thinks the GrapheneOS Motorola partnership won't happen, Google will put pressure on Motorola and make it fail. I really hope I'm wrong though.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That is until the official Motorola partnership happens with GoS and Motorola. It’s the missing piece for integrity verification as of current listed requirements on Google’s documentation. They needed to have first class support from a major OEM. Looking forward to seeing how Google will change that maliciously. This includes attestation.

Good point, I didn't think about that. It will be very interesting to see what happens.

[–] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Interesting indeed. I know I'll be buying one pretty much no matter what as long as reasonably priced.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm definitely watching from a distance 😅

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It won't they won't meet all the requirements if the partner ship even happens.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah it's dubious at best. Daniel will probably try to torpedo it somehow.

[–] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 4 points 2 weeks ago

GOS is far more secure than Google’s laughable excuse of a certification.

Far more secure for the user. Which infringes upon the supreme inalienable rights of corporations.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 52 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Companies that don't respect your privacy don't deserve your money either.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Problem is, thanks to capitalism, you're no longer choosing from dozens of companies. You're choosing between 2-3 conglomerates that own the dozens of brands. And all conglomerates will do the exact same shit, because they can, and you're left twiddling your thumbs, not choosing between auto manufacturers but between owning a vehicle or not.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Buy used, it's much smarter anyway, as you avoid a lot of depreciation that way.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Eventually the supply of used cars that don't do this shit is going to run out.

Stop confusing workarounds for a solution. The only actual solution is political: banning these anti-consumer practices entirely.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So don't purchase anything? Seems kind of hard to do.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not really, the used car market is full of options BUT you can't just blindly pick something.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 40 points 3 weeks ago

Hahahaha

Fuck you VW, and your hypocrisy.

Remember Dieselgate anyone?

[–] mrbn@lemmy.ca 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This should get interesting when motorola releases a phone with GrapheneOS on it.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 42 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

With the number of countries trying to crack down on privacy-focused phone OSs, I'm a little worried Motorola may get cold feet after talking to its lawyers. Has Motorola made any public statement promising these phones are coming?

[–] lostoncalantha@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Correct take. Corps only care about money and reputation.

[–] EvenOdds@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed. As desperate as I am for a genuine OEM GrapheneOS phone, I won't believe it until it actually happens.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

This is very odd, agree with the devs. Seems like a very aggressive action and with no reasoning behind it?

I wonder what the real story is.. What had GrapheneOS enabled (or blocked) on user phones that got their executives so pissed they'd explicitly block GrapheneOS users from their apps?

[–] Buffalobuffalo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 weeks ago

I'm sure we'll get that transparency any minute now. Same transparency I'm waiting for why my work is going for Return-to-office while simultaneously short on desks to return to office.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They changed something in the play integrity or one of those similar libraries. They're not explicitly targeting GrapheneOS, it's affecting some other platforms too. It was also affecting iPhones, but I think they've since fixed that.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe, the technical explanation is hopefully forthcoming. The article (which I will concede doesn't seem super professional) explicitly says "banned by Volkswagen", which is what I'm curious about.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks for that! Sounds like SEAT and Cupra (both have Volkswagen Group as their parent companies) are also affected - I wonder when this will spread to other Volkswagen & Porche-owned brands. What a terrible move for consumer choice/security/etc.

[–] Carighan@piefed.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's just stupid oversight, they switched to the Play Store API, which naturally excludes Graphene OS. But mind you this is the same managerial incompetence that brought us the lack of a Volks-Wagen (an affordable car that is) from Volkswagen, withdrawing partially from BEVs just as they get fully embraced and the sales start to accelerate, and of course who could forget the let's be honest fully C-suite ordered Diesel exhaust cheating.

At this point, Volkswagen needs to be shut down and all middle~executive management needs to be prosecuted going back 20 or so years. They're all criminally incompetent and ruined thousands of livelihoods with their negligence.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

They didn't block explicitly Graphene OS.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I will never use an app to interface with a car

[–] CoriolisSTORM88@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Good news, you’ve not missed anything. It’s a shit app for the id4 at least.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yep when I had my id4, I literally used the home assistant integration over the app itself because my simple dashboard I set up was miles better

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 weeks ago

We need a ban on checking the manufacturer/supplier of a device/os instead of checking for APIs.

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Was literally looking at a new VW the other day while getting some warranty work done (non VW). This news dropped the same day on my Lemmy feed and I said that takes VW out of the running.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

VW is Audi too for those who don't know.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Volkswagen Auto Group (VAG) is huge. It contains:

  • SEAT
  • Skoda
  • Cupra
  • VW
  • Audi
  • Lamborghini
  • Bently
  • Ducati
  • Porsche
  • MAN
  • International
  • Scania

And that’s just the vehicles.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I forgot VAG owns International now...

Don't forget about the currywurst sausages! Part number 199 398 500 A

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Thats fine, Volkswagen is hereby banned from my life.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 weeks ago

Already was for me, their cars are worse than American cars. I'd sooner a Ford or Chevy. And I haven't owned an American car in 20 years.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's fine, I wouldn't own a Volkswagen unless it was given to me.

And then I'd sell it.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

The only VW I'll own is air-cooled, or equipped with the EA827 (diesel or gas, either is fine).

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

That's fair, I'd probably keep one of those too.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yep, at least those had a reason for being what they are.

Any other VW is garbage.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

TBF, I would love a Mk1 Rabbit GTI (what the Golf was called in the US for a while). Mostly so I can restore it and gift it to my dad. He had a Mk1 GTI long ago, I remember only bits and pieces of it since he sold it when I was little. But he absolutely loved that car.

[–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I just hate the onboard car infotainment system. A car's job is to get me from one place to another. If you want to help with navigation, just give me a phone holder. That's all i need. I might just get a used secondary android phone just for the car if they keep pushing shit like this. I won't connect my primary device to the car ever.

load more comments
view more: next ›