this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
113 points (97.5% liked)
Technology
7009 readers
966 users here now
News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
What doesn't fit here?
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
- If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
- Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
- Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Wonder if there's a CANbus hack that can override in-cabin cameras? There's a CAN gateway port in most modern cars, right behind the rear-view mirror. That's how comma.ai gets to control the car and how dashcams get power.
If it gives access to the right bus, maybe somebody could come up with something...
Tear out your car's modem. Cars should not have modems. If you disagree for any reason please stay the fuck out of IT and automotive forever.
Just for those interested in this topic, almost all cars in the EU can have their camera taped and it works without a problem. Tested on Hyndai.
I've always wondered if you could make a kit to swap out a cars computer with a... Raspberry Pi or something. Wouldn't it be nice to have a car where you know what hardware it has, what software it's running and who gets data from it?
It's not that hard to make a car to run with an aftermarket ECU, there are already companies that make modular kits. However it's basically impossible to get a car with an aftermarket ECU through inspection. I live in a US state with no vehicle inspection, seatbelt or helmet laws so I can die a free man as god intended.
Every little thing in the car has a computer and they have kilometers of wire connecting it all. You would need hundreds of Raspberry PIs with CAN and LIN communication capabilities.
While developing a new car each of those computers has a team of developers and testers working for two or more years on that single thing, so in total a few thousand people have touched just the electronics in that car. Even if they cared about your privacy no single person would ever be able to know for sure what software is running on what hardware in every corner of that car.
The only way you'd get a feasible DIY car is with 1950s or 60s technology which is illegal to sell in most developed economies.
Cover them and see who complains first.
The drivers who will have an alarm that will not stop
Couldn’t you then just remove the speaker for that alarm?
I reckon it would be tied into the audio of the entire car, no doubt there is a way around it. I can see them in the future making it illegal to tamper with though
Wow, I’m an idiot. This is the obvious answer.
Nah not an idiot
Jailbreaking cars should be more common. This seems like a good incentive to make it more common.
It shouldn't have to be though :(
Yeah, I'm pretty sure new cars are just never going to be something I'll buy. I'll just stick to old manuals with no connectivity at all and bicycles.
Time to sort out some sort of small prismatic lensing device that puts an image of a person's head and face in front of the camera. Eyes front center and forward.
Don't forget the middle finger
"10 mins into driving, the distraction warning kicks in and tells you to take a break with an amber light on the instrument tablet and a loud bong. A big pop up message suggests you take a break. 10 mins later it does it again with a red light and loud bong. I found this incredibly distracting"
Heh heh.
it does an awooga sound if you're not wearing a shirt.