this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
288 points (95.9% liked)

People Twitter

10159 readers
1221 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 38 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

While I get the point this is trying to make there is a great deal of dysfunction in most of the ways we fight for causes, so we do kinda need to be able to examine our approaches and behavior critically 😅

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, and it's refreshing to see other people feel this way too

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

If we can't improve our approach, we will fail to make as much progress as possible!

The ability to critically self examine is so deeply important. Often we choose the emotionally cathartic choice and I think its important to examine whether those choices are functionally effective at accomplishing our ideals :)

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago

I've run into this issue so many times. I've never been much of a conformer, and most people really tend not to like anyone who doesn't (or can't) conform to their social scripts. Even sub-cultures have their own norms that they expect others to conform to.

So I butt heads with a lot of people. Especially people I generally agree with. I don't waste my time on right-wingers, cause there's no point in arguing with someone who's worldview is so diametrically opposed to your own, or someone who rejects facts and refuses to see reason.

But when I see leftists trying to make a good point, but using a terrible argument to do so, I'll tell them why their argument is bad and they'll fly off the handle accusing me of everything under the sun.

Or when someone advocates for methods that would be wrong, for a goal that seems right. The ends don't justify the means. But they'll call me a fascist for saying that, ironically. Or when someone has an armchair idea that sounds great in theory but simply isn't practical and would be impossible to implement. I might offer some critique or constructive criticism, but it's the same story.

Like, sometimes zealotry does more harm to a movement than good. I think leftists need to be the cool, calm, rational, factual beings who can combine logic and empathy to reach conclusions that are not only beneficial but also reasonable. Otherwise, what makes us any better than right-wing populist reactionaries?

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, assuming everyone with criticism Hates You and Your Cause is not very productive.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

If I could force every online person to understand one fact, it's this. Goddamn we need to understand that...

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Completely agree. I've argued with people about the ways they're trying to advocate for causes that i very much care about. If you're advocating for a cause I care about in a way that actually hurts our cause instead of helps it, then you for damn sure are rightfully gonna hear it from me

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

Yeah same. Though I try really hard to empathize with them just as much as I try to empathize with the folks I disagree with so that I can be effective in building bridges in advocating for my cause

I think much of the dysfunction in the ways we fight for progress is rooted in the way that online platforms have socialized us to adress the audience of people on the sidelines who already agree with us rather than the person we're ostensibly speaking to, and to try and find the perfect clapback, or most publicly show what "side" you're on. And unlearning your socialization is hard.

I have to work really hard not to let it get under my skin though, its agonizing watching someone "advocate" for your cause by actively doing damage to it 🥲

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

I'm sure that's how a lot of vegans online think about me but it's actually not true. I support the cause, but not the crazy shaming that happens online about it. Actually had to block a few people over that issue. The last person was practically foaming at the mouth and making loads of assumptions. They fucking hated me for basically nothing. Someone telling people like that their approach is bad shouldn't be viewed in a negative light. That's absolutely the thing they need to be told.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, people like that are unfortunately common in left-wing spaces. I say this as a leftist. We need to stop pretending that zealots don't exist on our side of the spectrum. They only give ammunition to the caricaturist right-wing pundits.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 5 points 12 hours ago

Yup, a few years ago i told a vegetarian that i was trying to eat meat less frequently and they said something like "if you're still eating meat then you aren't doing anything". Seriously? Such a militantly blind all-or-nothing nonsense take. Most people's reaction to that type of tactic is to say fuck it I'm purposely gonna eat even more meat now

[–] Gust@piefed.social 16 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

There are a lot of people who flock to social justice issues not because they give a shit about the issue, but they want to feel like they are morally superior to others for being on the right side of that issue. When somebody melts down at constructive criticism like that, it signals to me that they are the latter category and can be safely ignored. You cant make people grow up on the internet, best you can do is block them so you don't have to hear their tantrum

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

I fully agree with all this. I mean, it is possible that people like that also care about the issue itself, but the way it manifests for them places the priority on feeling superior and it's pretty awful. But yeah blocking is the only answer...

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 11 hours ago

Literally velma.

[–] toomanypancakes@crazypeople.online -3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

If it helps, I doubt most online vegans think about you at all.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

They sure spend a hell of a lot of time talking about it.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not talking about them then... ?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

These are mostly trolls. They don't care what makes you angry, they just want you angry. People are easier to manipulate when they're angry and it's harder to think about the issues they're deflecting from.

Even if this sounds too nuts, it's a better way to look at it anyway. It'll be easier to either make one comment and move on or just block them at the first signs of this type of abuse.

[–] yucandu@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Most people aren't smart enough to think for themselves and will believe whoever is nicer to them.

That's it. That's the whole game that conservatives are better at.

[–] iatenine@piefed.social 7 points 18 hours ago

This does not help your effect

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

When someone decides they hate someone else, they'll make up whatever shit they need to to continue to hate them.

[–] joyjoy@piefed.social 2 points 17 hours ago

Your cause? This doesn't help our cause.