this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
362 points (99.7% liked)

News

38371 readers
2440 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal judge tossed out the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit to access West Virginia’s unredacted voter rolls, which marks 13 straight court losses for the department’s floundering effort to seize sensitive voter data from every state.

U.S. District Judge Thomas E. Johnston, who was appointed by former president George W. Bush, granted West Virginia’s motion to dismiss DOJ’s lawsuit Monday. In a scathing order, Johnston found the department failed to make a sufficient legal argument for its demand of sensitive voter data.

President Donald Trump’s DOJ is on an impressive losing streak in its voter roll lawsuits. On Friday, a federal judge tossed DOJ’s lawsuit seeking New York’s unredacted voter roll for the same reasons that Johnston dismissed the West Virginia lawsuit. Last month, DOJ scored its first appeals court loss when a three-judge panel for the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of the DOJ’s Michigan lawsuit. But Civil Rights Division chief Harmeet Dhillon, seemingly unfazed from losing, asked for a rehearing before the full Sixth Circuit.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 53 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

WTF, seriously?! I haven't been following that because I just assumed our SoS offered them up ages ago without even being asked.

I graciously accept this rare bit of good news relevant to my shithole state.

[–] homes@piefed.world 47 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

here's the thing: the vast majority of what Trump does/tries to do gets overturned in court. like 99% of it. but, before it does, the devastating damage gets done. permenantly

for example: all that billions of dollars of public funding to the Corporation for Pubic Broadcasting that funded PBS, NPR, and thousands of public broadcasting stations nationwide that got shut down? Reversed in court. But the funding gone, as is the CPB, and all of the mechanisms of funding dispersement and the vast majority of the network of public broadcasting channels that took the better part of a century to build. You can't just snap a finger and bring it back. not today, not tomorrow, not in a decade or even two.

the same goes for the hundreds upon thousands of programs and initiatives, etc. affected by Trump's actions that court decisions have reversed/overturned/etc. The damage is done.

don't even get me started on USAID

The best we can do is pick up the pieces and try to rebuild, but... eh...

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Yup. Trump (and Miller who rode in with him) are destroyers, and it is a hundred times harder to build than it is to destroy.

They light matches and once the barn and every animal in it is burnt down, they leave, letting other people fight about whether it was right or not. While that happens, they are starting new fires, ad infinitum.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Noting that the judge was appointed by George Dubya, this in some way probably helped. It's so strange to say, but when you compare standards and ethics of then vs now, there is a lot of "this is total horseshit" coming from the old Republicans.

You guys need a lot more of that "a common enemy" thing going on and put aside differences to work the US back to a place where you have the luxury of squabbling about differences again.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's why the Dems have to declare the Republican Party DEAD, and only refer to them as the MAGA Party from now on. The Dems HATE being called the Democrat Party, so MAGAs refer to them that way routinely now. The Dems have to flip the script, and do the exact same thing back.

Dems don't like being called that, but it doesn't mean anything but a lame insult. But if you declare the Republican Party to be absolutely DEAD, and it has been replaced by the MAGA Party, those old school Republicans are going to freak out.

The Republican Party supposedly supported Smaller Government, Lower Taxes, Fiscal Responsibility, Family Values, Law & Order, etc. Most of it was a sham, but that was their claim. The MAGA Party doesn't endorse any of those issues, except maybe lower taxes, but only on the wealthy, and they are fully supportive of Corruption, Treason, Racism, EXTREME deficit spending, and of course, Pedophilia.

The Dems need to force the MAGA label and definition on the entire Republican Party, and make them disavow it, or accept it. Instead of making the Dems defend their reasons to retake power, make the MAGAs/Republicans go on the defense and defend why we should take our nation down the path of corruption and pedophilia.

"Senator, you claim to be a Republican, but that no longer exists, so how do you rationalize being an Official Pedophile, by your own MAGA Party's definition?"

Or

"Considering your MAGA Party's strong defense of Pedophilia, how do you feel about issues like Child Labor Laws?"

Or

"Considering the MAGA Party's total acceptance of scammy operations like crypto, prediction markets, stock market manipulation, insider trading, Internet sports betting, etc., how involved are you in these platforms? Would you support legalization of these platforms for children? Would you support the legalization of Insider Trading for citizens, or will you continue to support insider trading only for Congress?"

It's the MAGA Party now, they should be getting a lot of questions like that. Right now the old school Republicans are just biding their time until the Dems save them from themselves, but make them answer for MAGA crimes, and a LOT of old school Republicans will break ranks.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Man... The midterms and the 2028 elections are going to be fucking wild. It might very well be most/all of the states vs the feds.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

DOJ sent letters to every state last summer, demanding state election chiefs hand over their full, unredacted voter rolls under the guise of “voter list maintenance..."

After most states refused to comply...

So which states just handed it over? Democratic candidates in those states should be screaming about the election integrity in their states. MAGAs are very sensitive about any talk of election interference, so the Dems should access that anger and steer it. After all, MAGAs are virtuosically stupid, it shouldn't be too difficult to manipulate them. Tap into a deeply held grievance, stir it up, and point it at your target.

It's all MAGA has been doing all along. No reason that Dems can't take advantage of those same morons.

MAGA doesn't care about election integrity. They're upset they lost. Have you seen those "I'd rather be Russian than a democrat" shirts? It's not about any kind of integrity, it's about hating dems. They don't think Trump and his admin are bad so they don't see a problem with them having voter rolls. "Daddy's home" in their minds and daddy can have and do whatever he wants. Standing in his way is the issue.

Affordability is potentially the best winning strategy at the moment.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Didn’t they just send the DOJ into Atlanta and do this? Or did they have a warrant first?

[–] andrewmsc@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 days ago

they got a warrant based on the judge being either compromised or completely stupid