this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
174 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8803 readers
353 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new report suggests that some governments have ignored legal obligations to prevent climate harm for decades.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip 27 points 22 hours ago

The way the author keeps framing this as a first step to accountability it's almost sorta cure, of it wasn't so dangerously naive. Frankly, in today's political climate, the idea that those responsible will see any form of consequences is patently absurd.

[–] tunetardis@piefed.ca 16 points 22 hours ago

They knew about the toxicity of lead also, but somehow it came as a shocker when they discovered spewing it out of millions of tailpipes was leading to an accumulation in the environment.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

Of course they did. This is one of issues with our models of democracy, that may be quite difficult to solve.

Politicians and their parties have 4 or 5 years to introduce new and alter existing legislation, sign contracts with companies and agreements with other countries. If they don't do anything for 'now', and focus on the future - people won't vote for them anymore.

When one party promises improvements in 6 months, people will always choose it over a party that promises a stable and healthy environment in 50 years. Of course, the first one lies. But those lies work and get votes. So what do you do?

[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 8 points 20 hours ago

Why would have things been any different than today?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 21 hours ago

Eh, yes?

We've known about global warming since the 1890's when first scientific reports about it were published

This isn't a new thing, its just been swiped under the rug for decades because profits for a few people.

And before the capitalism bad crowd chimes in, every country ignored it unless you're willing to claim that the USSR was all about environmental protection (it was most definitely not)

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Put in the words of that guy about hospitals closing "I don't believe it".

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago

Just like they know them today but don't care because profits matter much more.

[–] mastertigurius@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Moneh-moneh-moneh-money! Moooneyy!