this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2026
68 points (98.6% liked)

3DPrinting

23209 readers
144 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago

land of the free!

[–] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

So transparent and stupid. Makes me want to print guns.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 26 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

There are so many legislative changes that could be made to curb gun violence in the US and most states and federal government have done next to none of them. Seem ironic that the one thing new York does also allows a degree of surveillance over personal technology? Well intentioned my ass, this is as well intentioned as internet age controls.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

We should refuse to even talk about "gun violence" in relation to these 3D printer bans because that's not even slightly what they are about.

They are 100.00000% about totalitarian surveillance and destruction of property rights. "Reducing gun violence" isn't even an excuse; it's an outright lie.

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social -3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Such as? Anything equal or adjacent to "restrict guns and ownership" is a political non-starter, and most anything less I can think of is impotent and/or easily circumvented.

[–] rklm@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

There is one form of gun control that has been effective and stood the test of time: Taxes.

The NFA has been working for almost a hundred years.

If politicians actually wanted to restrict gun ownership (rather than garnering temporary political support via impotent temporary policies the way California does) they'd use the NFA as a template.

As long as it is impossible to get the majority of states to agree to amend the constitution, any policy that infringes on citizens rights to bear arms is temporary at best.

There are decades of precedent in US courts that makes taxes and licensing not an infringement.