this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
125 points (95.6% liked)

movies

3834 readers
213 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's funny to see all the positive (including audience) reactions, after most of the internet discourse over the last few months was about how terrible the movie would be.

I'm lucky enough to have a (digital) IMAX theatre relatively nearby, so I'm planning to watch it there in a few weeks when the screenings are getting less crowded.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (4 children)

after most of the internet discourse over the last few months was about how terrible the movie would be.

Honestly, 99% of that, from what I could infer without spoiling every detail of the movie, were incels upset some dark skin actress was cast as Helen of Troy

Garbage people are louder than ever

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 15 points 1 month ago (4 children)

People also made a big thing out of the helmets being period-inaccurate. Which they absolutely are, but it was weird how people seemed to care so much for this movie in particular, whereas no-one seemed to give a shit about all the inaccuracies in the Gladiator movies for example.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Also, I bet a lot of the people complaining about that loved 300 and will tell people how it's actually really deep and has an important message

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The message of 300 was deep. We need more hot man on man action films.

[–] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If I paint abs on my flap does it count?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

of course it counts! it's my only hope

[–] Cytobit@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hasn't pretty much every period piece ever produced been criticized through the lens of historical accuracy?

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

They were very upset about Denzel being in Rome.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago

whereas no-one seemed to give a shit about all the inaccuracies in the Gladiator movies for example.

Do you know that for a fact? Or did you just not pay attention?

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Saw a lot of talk about the accents and the period incorrect uniforms. But yeah, internet gonna internet.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Even if that were the case, the Odyssey is a work of fiction; we don't even know if Homer actually existed, if he was a single person or multiple story tellers blended together by lack of details...

"Critics" pretending to know and be outraged about X not been exactly what they thought when they read the book cliff notes in their mom's sock smelling basement are just noise

[–] ImADifferentBird@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's so weird to be complaining about the accents. It's a movie that takes place in ancient Greece, FFS; we have no idea what their accents would sound like if they were somehow capable of speaking modern English, since their entire culture pre-dates audio recording technology (and modern English, for that matter) by multiple millenia.

Seriously, people are just weirdly conditioned to the classical world speaking with a British accent for some reason, I guess.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

the people that complaint about accents probably would walk away if the movie was actually made in ancient greek with subtitles

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

even so, who cares? it's not a documentary

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, I agree with you. Those were simply additional bloviated discussions I saw.

[–] Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Also no greek representation

[–] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That or the fact that a trans person played a supporting role

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

the horror!!!! someone I don't know does something different from what I would do!!! it's the end of the world I taell ya

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be fair, the trailers weren't very flattering. I wasn't expecting the movie to be that good either.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's fair. I didn't think the trailers were amazing either, although it did seem like they were purposefully not giving too much away, which I appreciate. But people got really hung up on the smallest details to prematurely declare it a bad movie.

[–] Malgas@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

Of all the times for a movie trailer to finally show restraint, not spoiling the plot of a movie based on a ~3000 year old epic poem sure is something.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which seems kinda crazy because wasn't the internet absolutely glazing Christopher Nolan just a couple years ago?

I still like his Dark Knight trilogy, and Inception is still fairly original.

[–] ImADifferentBird@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That was before he cast a black woman to play "the face that launched a thousand ships" and a trans man to play... well, anyone, really.

It's just all stupid culture war bullshit.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Ah. Then I'll continue to enjoy his movies.

[–] Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not really. He's not as overrated as he used to be. People have started seeing through his Grand visuals combined with a heavy score. He's being heavily criticised for not able to write female characters.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 month ago

I've had Christopher Nolan in the "Hit or miss" category since Interstellar and Dunkirk. Interstellar was so shit

[–] TheImpressiveX@piefed.social 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The Odyssey is now Christopher Nolan's highest-rated film on Rotten Tomatoes.

  • Following (1998) - 87%
  • Memento (2000) - 94%
  • Insomnia (2002) - 92%
  • Batman Begins (2005) - 85%
  • The Prestige (2006) - 76%
  • The Dark Knight (2008) - 94%
  • Inception (2010) - 87%
  • The Dark Knight Rises (2012) - 87%
  • Interstellar (2014) - 73%
  • Dunkirk (2017) - 92%
  • Tenet (2020) - 70%
  • Oppenheimer (2023) - 93%
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Critic reviews are so all over the place. 73% for interstellar is wild, it's #17 on IMDB at 8.7.

The threshold for rotten tomatoes critics though is about as low as the mariana trench.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Interstellar's plot is complete dogshit though

The people who are hung up on the plot are strange to me. It's science fiction with time travel, and the black hole mcguffin tying it all together is as good of a rationale as any.

If you want things that only have "hard" science fiction, there are other stories for that. If instead you grew up watching stuff like star trek and enjoyed it then maybe you can appreciate it for what it is: a story with a whole load of emotion and science fiction.

All time travel is bogus as far as we know. Stories with it can still be entertaining.

[–] ThuggyG@piefed.ca 1 points 1 month ago

A lot of Nolan’s movies have stupid plots and make up for it by being an absolute spectacle

[–] stretch2m@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago

That is one impressive filmography.

[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Damn, higher than Oppenheimer.

[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't trust RT and I don't trust first reviewers opinions. The real score will be on Imbd in 2-3 weeks. I really hope it's this good.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

IMDb añso tends to be very generous. I think FilmAffinity is more reliable.

[–] aamram@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Yes you're right.

[–] weariedfae@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

It was good. Not 100% faithful to the source material but when are movies ever? It was pretty dang entertaining.

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hope this gives an aneurysm to Elon.

[–] homes@piefed.world 12 points 1 month ago

I hope Elon gets an aneurysm from something much more common and mundane like a bagel or looking at the sky.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m waiting for discount Tuesday at my local IMAX theater to see it. For those who have seen it, was the use of modern lingo not bad as it seemed to be? I was kinda turned off with the trailers.

Also, is everything just dark and blue hues or is there at least some color like it was actually supposed to happen in the Mediterranean, and not Scandinavia? Those were my only gripes when I saw the trailer.

And I hope the dialogue isn’t just exposition (see Tenet).

[–] weariedfae@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There's color depending on where they are. As for dialogue, it's pretty much all exposition but it didn't bother me and it usually does ¯\(ツ)/¯.

Modern lingo wasnt my favorite but it was fine.

[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Weird that the entire hate people have against it is that they cast Lupita Nyong'o as Helen.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

maybe some day I see it and I hope I like it. I feel like things that I see that get massive this is the best thing every is like alright nowadays and things that see that get pretty good are meh and meh is just stinkaroo. I feel like movie reviews have something like grade inflation.

[–] LordFireCrotch@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

RT is paid reviews and unreliable. I'll wait for unpaid second hand reviews. Critics these days are all paid because Hollywood is hemorrhaging money with every flop that's come out and are hoping for release hype to get back as much as possible in the first few weeks.

If I'm wrong then I'm wrong. Remind me in a month if this movie is actually an IGN 10/10