this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2026
301 points (98.1% liked)

politics

30535 readers
3544 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

That's because they're dumber than Trump is.

Can we just think about that for a moment? That's a really difficult feat.

[–] stretch2m@infosec.pub 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Because gas prices are the yardstick, apparently? Who cares about the wholesale destruction of the Constitution? Who cares about the war crimes? Who cares about the racist and illegal imprisonment and deportation of legal residents? Just whatever you do, don't jack up gas prices. JFC

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Most people care about what affects them directly and nothing more.

[–] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 3 points 8 hours ago

The irony is that it is affecting them directly and most of them still don't get it.

"The trees voted for the axe because the handle was made of wood."

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 4 points 20 hours ago

Seeing the ugly underbelly of America has been hard. This many people are this awful inside? Really?

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

"Nazis lament that they suffer for their perfect ideas"

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is expected but still sad that only some can admit not being at war with Iran nor closing the strait of Hormuz, IN HINDSIGHT, would have led to cheaper fuel.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Even sadder is that so many of those people care more about gas prices going up than the illegality of the war itself and its civilian casualties in Iran.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Republicans do not care about human lives. They barely care about American lives.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They don't care about any loves other than their own. They lack empathy. Everyone other than them is expendable.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

That's not fair, they also care about lives they aren't alive yet. Once they're born they can get fucked though.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I don't think people realize the humanitarian crisis that's going to occur if the desalination plant attacks spiral any further. It'll consume not just Iran but the entire region.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Can't even get it right when these idiots are admitting they're wrong.

GAS WOULD BE SIGNIFICANTLY LESS OF AN ISSUE EITHER WAY BECAUSE WE WOULDN'T HAVE PISSED AWAY 2 YEARS PRETENDING ELECTRIFICATION WERE DEAD.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

For real, the removal of federal incentives caused a huge wave of EV cancellations, which will inevitably increase demand for oil, which will increase prices.

But as always the bipartisan support for higher oil prices comes from the lack of regulation around them. Big Oil is taking this opportunity to drive up prices artificially and recording record profits (again). You would think with the importance of oil on our entire economy that someone would reign them in but alas their pockets are too deep.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 27 points 1 day ago (4 children)

FTA:

Thirty-five percent said gas prices would have gone up the same amount under a Democrat, while only 34 percent of Trump’s 2024 voters believe gas prices would have gone up more under a Democratic administration.

Am I reading this correctly? 69% of Trump voters think gas would have been the same or worse with Harris?

I seriously doubt that any of these people thought for one moment about what they said, but this is actually a complicated issue. Would Iran have closed the Strait of Hormuz if only Israel had attacked them? My guess is that they wouldn't, but it's just a guess.

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

How? Would Harris have also picked a fight with Iran to distract from the epstien files?

[–] III@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You falsely assume they can connect those two dots.

[–] YouTalkinToMe@lemmy.wtf 1 points 10 hours ago

Everything goes in the square hole

[–] locahosr443@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Probably not, but if Israel had attacked its pretty clear she'd have sent them any material they asked for.

Maybe the trump dips hits aren't that far off on this one. Though more likely it wouldn't have escalated this far.

[–] Spezi@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It could very well be that Israel wouldn’t have attacked Iran in the first place if Trump wasn’t president.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks dbshitters.

[–] left_is_best@feddit.online 1 points 1 day ago

Ah, but you're forgetting that something something socialism.

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 30 points 1 day ago

…..and what did they learn? That’s right, nothing.

[–] makeshift0546@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago

What do you want🤷‍♂️

They are retarded deplorables. Unredeemable.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't vote for trump, but I might have if I knew that he would make gas prices higher than $100/gallon permanently.

We can't afford the cost of low gas prices.

[–] SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Trump is a radical Moaist environmental terrorist. Change my mind.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 13 hours ago

Also cares about improving working conditions for the people Mexico, apparently.

And improving the energy independence of the Cuban people

[–] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly one Iran war cheaper

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Tarrifs, corruption, ICE funding, concentration camps, protest response, extra assassination attempts, remodeling the white house every six months, the ballroom, setting up adversarial trade relations with most of the world, lawsuits (sometimes against himself in order to extract money from the government), Trump has spent more than any other president and has greatly increased the debt ceiling.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some Trump supporters believe in objective reality? Well, that’s a start.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

All of them have been lied to for decades. Some are beginning to see it.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Lots of things would be cheaper.

[–] WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Obligatory leopards and faces

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago
[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago
[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago

Theres a name I havent heard in years