this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
120 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30608 readers
2531 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This intentionally pushes more people to the Medicare Advantage ~~scams~~ plans.

It's a handout to insurance companies. The worst ones. All under the banner of saving tax payer dollars.

Premiums might go down! (Nevermind your drug costs going up).

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Premiums might go down!

They won't. And if asked they'll just say inflation like it's a magical incantation.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

inflationus Bidenicus

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Supply chain!

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My first thought as well. I did pharmacy claims support for a major pharmacy chain some years ago, and I didn't know a whole lot about Medicare going into it, being a 20-something man who already realized Fox News was bullshit at the time. But from what I learned about Medicare "Advantage" plans, I could find very little compelling reason why they would be better than just plain ol' part D.

If anything, it seemed like it was intended to separate elders from their money. Oh you've got the premium (more expensive) Medicare with an exclusive (more restrictive) formulary and doctors network. Like it's specifically designed for slightly better off retirees who want to feel superior to the plebians with their socialist Medicare. That's for the poors (more darker), just like public transit.

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Its Obama's Fault 🙄

[–] skhayfa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He's getting ready for the midterm loss. With that he'll have a leverage on a potential Democrat majority.

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Hanlon's razor, Trump edition: never attribute to cold and calculating self-interest what can be adequately explained by malice.

[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

He's going to declare martial law in August.