People didn’t read Project 2025 and it shows.
https://boondockorbust.com/resources/project-2025-and-the-future-of-national-parks/
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
59 points (100.0% liked)
politics
30717 readers
2215 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
You're not wrong. Though the media they watch never brought it up either. There's enough failure to go around. I mentioned today to my mother, a lifelong Democrat and Union member not at all a trump fan. That the east wing of the whitehouse had been demolished. And she replied incredulously shocked "really?!". Yeah, like a year ago. And it's not like they don't watch the news or get information generally. It's just the news in general is a failure.
Even the mainstream supposedly "liberal" media barely talked about Project 2025. If anything, they often acted like it was some kind of blue equivalent of Qanon, and anyone talking about it was just being hyperbolic and hysterical, etc.
The Murc's Law Media (the only "liberal" media we really have) is generally terrible at informing people of just how awful the Republicans and the conservatives really are.
And of course the average conservative chud either didn't know about it, or, if they were told about it, they were either in favor of whatever it had because that's how they are, or just thought it was a "conspiracy theory".
Yeah and I'm not exactly sure what to do about it. Where to tell your average person where to get their information from right now. Definitely none of these mainstream corporate owned outlets. Unfortunately I really don't know of anything too similar to suggest as a substitute often. A lot of stuff I watch the people are half my age. So even a lot of people my age wouldn't be crazy about that in the first place. Let alone even older friends and family. There's a few things like breaking points with Crystal ball. She's generally decent even if her co-host is pretty trash. But outside of that it's pretty tough. I enjoy her husband's content as well. But yeah that's going to be too abrasive for a lot of older people the way he talks. Which is stupid but it's still a fact.
I mean, to be fair: it's 920 pages. Sure, these days, you might be able to throw it into an AI and have it summarize for you, but if we had a media that took seriously the notion of being "the fourth estate", they would have moved heaven and Earth to inform virtually everyone about it, and they would have done the summary, all in the run-up to the election.