this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
588 points (99.7% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

47589 readers
1458 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 201 points 1 month ago (19 children)

... posted a photo on social media of the 62.5g bar alongside one of today's Mars Bars, which is 40g.

"Over the last 35 years, we have made a number of updates to our bar sizes and pack formats to reflect consumer demand, alongside considering wider external factors such as manufacturing costs and the price of cocoa."

I'm sure your customers have been demanding smaller bars that cost more.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 80 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"We didn't only shrink the size, we also lowered the quality of ingredients to maximize profits!"

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

The only people who enjoy Mars bars are shareholders

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 121 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Factoring in 35 years of inflation. A $0.50 mars bar in 1991 is $1.21 today. The cost of a Mars bar today is at least $1.50 USD (after converting from UK pounds) and that's being generous.

Companies are greedier than ever and there seems to be no stopping it (meaning because of the oligarchy in the US, Congress will never do a damn thing about it, and certainly the spoiled man-baby's executive branch will do nothing about it), and no end in sight of it.

Fuck them all.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I would also be surprised if the cost of production, now using cheaper ingredients and far more automation, hadn't also decreased.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh absolutely. Productivity has increased drastically since the 90s but wages never kept up.

[–] PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Don't say it in cop voice. Say:

workers engineers and scientists made everything drastically more productive and the pedophiles stole all the gains. We keep letting them.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We're saying the same thing. The productivity surplus is getting stolen by the Epstein class. I'm not trying to sugarcoat anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does infinite growth mean eternal shrinkflation? Will it ever plateau? Or collapse?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

In 1991 those were closer to 30 cents.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 76 points 1 month ago

Even the font weight shrank

[–] DonkeyStar@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago

Also, recipe blogs are a great source of information on shrinkflation. Going to the store to look for a package size that no longer exists is fun.

[–] TedZanzibar@feddit.uk 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Back in the dialup days when brands were first coming online I used to have quite a thing for a Toffee Crisp. When I got a bar that was noticeably smaller than the last, I emailed them expecting a reply about market forces or cost of ingredients, but maybe they'd also send a voucher for a free bar or something.

Instead they tried to gaslight me, telling me they'd always been that size and that I must be imagining it. I was so put out by it that, other than a very occasional multi-pack for picnics, I haven't bought a single-serve Toffee Crisp, Mars Bar, Snickers etc since.

When shrinkflation became a recognised term I felt so vindicated! I wish I still had that email so that I could shove it in their faces.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

I saw a Curly Wurly in a shop the other day, and they're now a pale imitation of what they were.

[–] FreshLight@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ScriptSage@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago

Damn those are some grippers

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I always had the feeling that they were 56% bigger when I was a kid.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago

I'm curious to see how different the ingredient lists are between the two.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I bet the ingredients are worse now too

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's a weird thing to think about, but in a ship-of-Theseus sort of way a lot of the products we grew up with don't really exist anymore. By that I mean, if it's half the size and made of different ingredients then the Mars Bar as it was introduced has effectively been discontinued. There's just some other, crappier knock-off being sold under the same name now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] filcuk@feddit.uk 7 points 1 month ago

That's almost the worst part. Not only is the food ultra-processed now, but it's all engineered to extract every fraction of a penny in margins.
If this goes on, I might as well just inject palm oil straight to my veins.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Enshittification is the word of the decade. Century?

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'd sign for enshittification being the worst thing that happens this century. Considering there are years 73 ahead of us in the century, it might only be the precursor of what will actually be the word of the century.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I think fascism is worse. I think Russia invading Ukraine is worse. I think the genocide by Israel of the Palestinians is worse. I think wealth inequality is worse. I think the lack of social safety nets in the US, especially universal heatlh case, is worse.

Enshittification is bad, but I really don't think it's the worst thing.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

enshittification is the symptom of the underlying issue

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I could be wrong, but I believe the person to whom you replied was indicating that they would be okay with "enshittification" being the word of the century, because there are SO MANY worse things on the horizon or actively festering and spiraling out of control that, if "enshittification" is the worst thing to happen this century, that would be an acceptable outcome. I believe they were using "sign for" as in "to accept, as of a package or parcel"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago

I mean the wealth inequality is sorta what drives it all.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Remember BJ Novak calling out Cadburys blatant advertising lie about the new eggs were not getting smaller. That you were getting bigger.

Start of CadburyGate segment:

https://youtu.be/TlXLCrzpToo?t=172

Fulls interview

https://youtu.be/TlXLCrzpToo

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kalapala@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 month ago

The chocolate was thicker too. Easier to peel off and eat separately.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Even the font got skinnier!

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I clearly remember they were 68 grams when I was a kid, which always weighed on my mind when I had to choose between a Mars bar and the 78 gram Oh Henry

[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago

When I was a kid, a pound of coffee was 16 ounces (US). Now it's down to 12. They do it in small steps, so no one realizes it's happening until you see something like this.

[–] OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This explains why I only needed to eat 1 Mars bar to feels satisfied back in the days while I now have to eat 3-4 bars.

[–] excral@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not really. That bar was 62.5g while modern ones are 40g. So to offset shrinkflation you'd have to eat about 1.5 modern bars, not 3-4.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I took that as part of the joke.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

They had a better font back then too.

load more comments
view more: next ›