Charli XCX's 365 from her album brat made it pretty clear that it's cocaine.
I feel the answer is obvious. My company gives me money in exchange for service, so clearly they can afford it, but why do they require the service?
The government doesn't give you free college unless you earn it through military service.
Just to be clear, I do wish the government would forgive loans and make college free for everyone. It's important to invest in education.
As Nolan intended
It feels very odd to me to view someone rating a movie as 51/100 as them giving it a positive rating.
Hey, I go to a lot of AMC theaters, I feel very strongly that it was the "Dolby" theater. I've had similar experiences there (but haven't walked out). It might be a perfect storm of scenarios making it uniquely worse, but I can definitely say everyone in our group has all had the same experience at Dolby theaters.
Every retold story is slightly different. Readapting works in the public domain is a tale as old as time.
Starscream: Who are you?
Odysseus: I am nobody!
Starscream: Megatron, help me! I am being attacked by nobody!
Freddy Faz Bear: Hor hor hor hor hor
Reading this with a passion flower in my hair on my way to a tiki party.
Gosh. I remember working with this back in 2019 and earlier. Our legacy products ran on it. I remember a new service we made (before Spring Boot really took off) used TomCat. It was so much easier to mess with. I asked why we don't use that for our main product. Imagine my surprise when they said we actually used to.
I'm sure they had their reasons, I was a younger dev at the time and didn't have insight into why they changed it. But still. Everything is so simple now. Java to run your jar. Your jar has your server built in. Done. And that's not even including containerization.
I do miss Jenkins though. GitHub Actions seems to be the new hotness. Maybe I just don't have the muscle memory yet, but it can be annoying.
This is my childhood
You could cheese this by picking a statistic for something like "likelihood to agree if asked for a favor". I'm not going to stress over the wording on how to make it most useful, but something like that could be interesting.
Or something like "amount of undiagnosed cancers" if you want to save people.
I don't know, the number of times I've needed to make two small changes in parallel is certainly non zero. The amount of times I've been mostly done with a feature and began a new one before a PR was totally merged is certainly non zero. Even then, some changes can make more sense if broken it into multiple commits (a moot point at most teams since squash and rebase seems to be the norm). You can keep a linear history and still have multiple commits in a branch, just commit (har har) to reading instead of merging.
Regardless, doing commit fixups and rewords are not necessarily rare. These commands are still super useful. Bear in mind that just because something isn't useful to your workflow, git is used by many different people with many different types of workflows.