this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
121 points (96.9% liked)

News

23296 readers
3203 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The former president had been seeking to use data protection laws to sue the company run by Christopher Steele but the High Court has thrown out the case.

Mr Steele compiled the dossier which contained unproven allegations about bribing officials and sex parties.

It was leaked to the media just before Mr Trump was sworn in as president.

In bringing the lawsuit against Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd, he said the dossier contained allegations that were inaccurate and breached his data protection rights.

In Thursday's ruling in London, Mrs Justice Steyn DBE said she did not make any judgement on the allegations themselves but found Mr Trump's claim had not been brought within the six-year limitation period.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] garretble@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Release the pee pee tape

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steele_dossier#Allegations

Read em. They are not National Enquirer, they’re very boring, very probable, very illegal acts of a demented rapist and fraud. The “Proof” series of books, lays it all out in explicit and aggravatingly well-researched detail.

[–] ralphio@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

FYI: CNN on the credibility of Steele's sources.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/18/politics/steele-dossier-reckoning/index.html

There are plenty of confirmed crimes committed by Trump. No reason to continue to cling to this.

[–] ralphio@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Let me do my penance here and acknowledge that there almost certainly was some level of collusion between Trump and Russia running up to the 2016 election. That said, the Steele dossier is National Enquirer level of tabloid bullshit. It's so divorced from any sort of evidence that I wonder what case Trump could possibly have here even if he met the deadline to file. If I make a bunch of baseless claims about someone I have not violated their privacy.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's worth noting that the most salacious allegation from the Steele Dossier was actually confirmed by the Mueller report:

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/pee-tape-trump-mueller-report-823755/

"According to the report, on October 30th, 2016, Trump’s private attorney and fixer Michael Cohen received a text from a Russian businessman involved in the Trump Tower Moscow deal, in progress for more than a year. “Stopped flow of tapes from Russia but not sure if there’s anything else. Just so you know….” Giorgi Rtskhiladze wrote to Cohen. Cohen told investigators he spoke to Trump about the issue after receiving the texts from Rtskhiladze. 

Rtskhiladze later admitted he had been told the tapes were fake, but he did not communicate that to Cohen, the report says. 

Rtskhiladze’s description of the tapes’ content tracks with the unverified information included in the Steele dossier, which claimed that Trump watched Russian prostitutes urinate in a Moscow hotel room in 2013. “Rtskhiladze said ‘tapes’ referred to compromising tapes of Trump rumored to be held by persons associated with the Russian real estate conglomerate Crocus Group, which had helped host the 2013 Miss Universe Pageant in Russia.”"

[–] ralphio@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Rtskhiladze later admitted he had been told the tapes were fake

What am I missing here?

ETA: What I'm saying is if the tapes were fake how could they have been used as blackmail. For blackmail to be effective you need to prove it exists.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

The tapes are real, the content of the tapes are fake.

[–] arymandias@feddit.de 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The Mueller report specifically concludes that they could not find evidence of collusion. It did find clear evidence of Russia trying to influence the election in favor of Trump, but no collusion from the Trump campaign with Russia in this effort. Given what we know about the general competency of Trump and his campaign how likely would it be that he was capable of hiding collusion from the full force of the FBI?

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Mueller report also documented many cases of obstruction, the reason they couldn't come to a conclusion, and was hamstringed by not being allowed to look into finances. Also Trump is on record saying he fired Comey for that Russia thing because it was made up (of course Trump never lies). So it seems he was capable in some capacity. Also having the boss of the people who are doing the investigation on your side never hurts, why do you think it was shut down soon after Barr was appointed?

[–] ralphio@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah you're right that there is nothing definitive. I've always found Manafort's actions to be the most suspicious though. Maybe "almost certainly" is too presumptive.