this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
969 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

32465 readers
611 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 164 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Someone should create a leaderboard of websites sharing data with the most "partners", this week I saw someone on Mastodon posting a screenshot of a website sharing to 1700+ third-parties.

[–] Lath@kbin.social 63 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My faulty memory tells me 9gag has somewhere around 3000 or so. But I worked with a lot of numbers recently so I have no idea how accurate that is.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The most shocking thing about that is that 9gag still exists. How far has it degraded?

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You say that like 9gag had a quality site at one point

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

It had some funny meme and your browser didn't freeze after scrolling for 5 minutes. That's already 1 point for 9gag

Edit: this was around 2015. No idea how 9gag looks like now

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 months ago

Incel paradise since all the decent people left

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lath@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago

There's a lot of anti-stuff going around there. Let's just say that even if it were possible, federation with 9gag is definitely a hard pass from both sides.

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If it's anything like iFunny, the comment section is likely horrific enough to contest 8chan

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

EW.

Just clicked it and opened their USA page. Racist drivel.

And disabled protections but couldn’t get it to pop up a tracker notice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 months ago

That sounds like they're using Admiral's sh!tty brokerage and anti-adblock thing, saw one site with over 1500 partners. Most difficult one to block because of how frequently they buy domains for adblock evasion...

One of these days I'm going to just blacklist the IP ranges of their google cloud fleet

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 67 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I know we shouldn't abuse the word, but I feel like "slut" is appropriate here.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 37 points 10 months ago

To continue that analogy, they're the pimp and you're the slut. You're the one getting shared around.

[–] Trincapinones@lemmy.world 62 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is kinda funny having pihole and seeing "0 partners" in my Samsung TV

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Trincapinones@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, i think their terms of services are scripted so if they get more or less advertisers based on your country between other things, that way they can redirect the same page to everybody

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 8 points 10 months ago

Oh so that's how they do it, has to go to the list of things that give you feelings of power

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 47 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The data broker deletion services all advertise deleting your info from 2-300 agents. Who the fuck are the other several thousand, what are they doing with the data, and how the fuck is any of this legal.

[–] kionite231@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

how the fuck is any of this legal.

It's not!

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 44 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why would you even put the number at that point

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 52 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 23 points 10 months ago

Ooooooooohhhh

Makes sense

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We should have a challenge of finding the site with most "friends".

[–] NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

Screenrant offered me 1516 exclusive partners yesterday.

[–] LunchEnjoyer@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Out of curiosity, what service was this?

[–] clever_banana@lemmy.today 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 18 points 10 months ago

I'll never get why, in a privacy community that doesn't come up without asking.

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The "Blocked since install" stat on uBlockOrigin is always an eye-opener.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 10 months ago

Fuck me, 6 million across both browsers and my work PC.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Visit our site as you normally would with the advertising and tracking.

No, i wouldn't normally visit any site with the advertising and tracking.

At least they mention that they track you. Most talk only about ads.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 9 points 10 months ago

I do not like them here or there.

I do not like them anywhere.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Use Chrome enhanced privacy protection now.

That way it'll just be one of their closest friends, who might coincidentally sell it to the other 755.

[–] Undertaker@feddit.de 40 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do never use Chrome. Use Firefox based Browsers (Librewolf, Mull)

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

some websites require Chrome and don't work with anything else.

and then these college classes I'm taking, my laptop broke so they're loaning me a campus Chromebook. I'm like okay whatever. Of course just use it for school nothing else.

[–] danafest@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

You could try changing the user agent string in Firefox to make the site think you're using chrome

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 8 points 10 months ago

If you even remotely care about your privacy, get off of an ad-company's monopolistic browser. Firefox + uBlock Origin is the essentials for at least baseline privacy, then go up from there if you so choose.

[–] planish@sh.itjust.works 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] jwt@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago

Cookie bukkake.

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Is the web site sharing with them or does it make you share with them so that your CPU does most of the processing and uploading to each advertising lead leech?

This would explain why we need more and more powerful/expensive phones just to keep browsing.

[–] clever_banana@lemmy.today 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It's also gobs of telemtey and AB testing constantly watching how you're interacting with what's on the page and changing what you see to figure out what makes you engage more & longer. All that processing requires a lot of resources compared to sites that respect your privacy.

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How much of that do script blockers protect you from?

[–] clever_banana@lemmy.today 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)

100% if you block all JavaScript. But then those worst-of-the-worst sites dont load at all

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Every geek I knew in the early 90's was naively evangelizing about the internet ushering in a new age of enlightenment.

I was too, I admit. Am now optimistic about the benefits of a UBI but, with the above humbling experience, guardedly so — the unintended consequences might be impossible to predict.

[–] NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It is the human condition.

For a while we believed that automation and robots would lead to people not having to work and furthering culture and arts for all of humanity.

People always ignore jealousy and greed, the two most prolific attributes of most worker-ant humans.

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

A study has undermined the greed angle.

Turns out that (amongst OECD countries) GDP per capita is not correlated with indicators of happiness at all. What is correlated is the degree of income equality...

and here is the great part...

Even for rich people. They too have better lives where there is more equitable income distribution. One day they will hopefully realise.

https://www.ted.com/talks/richard_wilkinson_how_economic_inequality_harms_societies

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I’ve seen that on a couple video game news sites and am just fuck it, I won’t read the article then.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 7 points 10 months ago
  • So, it's maximum security, is that clear?
  • Quite clear, sir. Only myself and the rest of the English-speaking world is to know.

Read more: https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/view_episode_scripts.php?tv-show=blackadder&episode=s04e01

load more comments
view more: next ›