this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
264 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

87337 readers
4010 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/50808662

Health data appears to be most affected by administration’s attempt to wipe findings that don’t align with its priorities, tracker shows

A database of federal law enforcement officer misconduct records. A survey measuring physical, sexual and emotional violence against children and youth. Real-time pollution readings collected by air quality monitors from US embassies around the world.

These are among the hundreds of federal datasets that the Trump administration has taken down or altered as part of its aggressive campaign to wipe all mentions of data findings that do not align with the administration’s priorities.

Over the past year and a half, at least 28 federal datasets have been deleted and another 338 data collections have been modified, according to an online tracker released last week from dataindex.us, a group of data policy experts, researchers and developers that formed last year to monitor changes to government data.

“We’re at a very vulnerable point as a nation,” said Denice Ross, former US chief data scientist under the Biden administration and a cofounder of dataindex.us. “We’re facing a future where we are not going to have the information that we need to make decisions that will save lives and benefit American communities.”

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shiftymccool@piefed.ca 3 points 4 hours ago

Why isn't this data stored in an immutable way? HIPAA records and access logs need to be stored in some way to not allow them to be modified, not even by an administrator. Why isn't governmental data stored like that? Partisan turnover is always going to want to change data from the previous administration. They either want to pump their views and/or make the previous one look bad. We need data security to prevent this kind of bullshit

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Trump 2.0???

THEY MADE A SECOND ONE?

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 3 hours ago

It's his i.q.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Are the Epstein files still intact? Seems we will never know.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

I would be more surprised if they haven't been deleted or the sources tempered with.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 25 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Something that just confuses me... this stuff should be backed up right? shouldn't this stuff be put in in a means that, a competent administration down the line can pull from backups.

[–] TheRiskiestBiscuit@reddthat.com 1 points 2 hours ago

It is “backed up”, but not by the government.

The folks that maintain archives are ready to release them to a future, competent administration.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's not just about backups. If you discontinue the collection of certain data or mess with the data itself before publication, the whole study might get useless. Take those long-term studies researching health outcomes over decades. If you mess with the data collection there, you can't get clean data back after Trump is dead.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 2 points 17 hours ago

Well yeah I'm more than aware that many of the programs that were shut down mid studies, could have an insane amount of work that can't just be paused and picked back up in the middle, only talking about the data sets that are being explicitly deleted or changed, of which I can't imagine there's not enough version control and redundancy in the government that shouldn't make it possible to return a data set to the exact form it was on an exact day.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

normally yes which is why malicious but competent govs (like Harper's in Canada) moved to destroy even the backups of the long gun registry they abolished

with the orange pedo, they are so mediocre, I'd expect the dta to survive if Americans get off their asses and put a stop to this regime sooner than later

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 7 points 22 hours ago

Yes it is backed up, but they went after those as well.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

You'd hope so (especially backups by the public since all this ought to be public domain data), but the other problem is that the organizations collecting it are being destroyed so there will be discontinuities in it forever now.

[–] axh@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Don't worry, Elon has a backup made during the Doge moment.