this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
1085 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59596 readers
4799 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Muso, a research firm that studies piracy, concluded that the high prices of streaming services like Spotify and Apple Music are pushing people back towards illegal downloads. Spotify raised its prices by one dollar last year to $10.99 a month, the same price as Apple Music. Instead of coughing up $132 a year, more consumers are using websites that rip audio straight out of YouTube videos, and convert them into downloadable MP3 or .wav files.

Roughly 40% of the music piracy Muso tracked was from these “YouTube-to-MP3” sites. The original YouTube-to-MP3 site died from a record label lawsuit, but other copycats do the same thing. A simple Google search yields dozens of blue links to these sites, and they’re, by far, the largest form of audio piracy on the internet."

The problem isn't price. People just don't want to pay for a bad experience. What Apple Music and Spotify have in common is that their software is bloated with useless shit and endlessly annoying user-hostile design. Plus Steve Jobs himself said it back in 2007: "people want to own their music." Having it, organizing it, curating it is half the fun. Not fun is pressing play one day and finding a big chunk of your carefully constructed playlist is "no longer in your library." Screw that.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 284 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (16 children)

If y'all got kids, don't forget to teach them how MP3's and actual media files work, I see many young people nowadays don't even realize you can locally store your own music in a portable device-agnostic format. They're beginning to get used to the idea of not owning anything.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 153 points 9 months ago (9 children)

First you're gonna have to teach them how file systems work since they've spent a life saving everything to Google Drive or OneDrive and using a search term to find their files.

[–] Lesrid@lemm.ee 115 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm continually astonished how I thought grunt-work IT jobs would fade away as my generation and younger aged into the workforce becoming ever more technologically literate. Then the iPhone my rich friends bought in highschool became the new standard for interfaces.

Now I'm helping people several years younger and much older than me navigate the machines they use for their jobs.

[–] Kid_Thunder@kbin.social 39 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

Yeah funny, right? I thought the same thing. It'd just be the older people and the younger would be more technically literate. But companies started abstracting a lot of things now and it's both the older and younger that struggle with IT literacy.

I think thin clients with VDIs will be the future and both make this stuff even more abstracted for users and also bring in the age of subscribing to workstations. At work, it'll start by just plopping stuff in your documents folder or personal folder or whatever and/or the desktop. They'll live on a network share and the VDIs will revert to snapshots to be 'fresh' every time but the users won't really know that. Their stuff will be plopped down like it is local every time and 'follow' them from VDI to VDI.

Then I think this will push to the home market and instead of spending a lot of money up front, you just get a cheap thin client, probably eventually a small little box with USB ports and mini-DP or whatever. You'll then pay for the tiers you want. Want just a workstation to check mail on and do 'web apps' type stuff? $5 with a whole 5GB of personal space or whatever. Then there'll be "productivity tiers" with pretty much the same stuff but more CPU, RAM and a small amount of vGPU allocated and you can install programs with something like 500 GB of personal space. There'll be a "pro" version with more of everything and a "gamer" version with a lot of everything probably costing something like $30/$40 a month starting out per device.

And of course eventually, you'll be getting ads to "keep the prices increases down" and then that won't matter anymore and you'll be given the option to pay for ad-free add-ons, time on the workstation and so-on. Prices will raise nearly every year. Thin clients will turn into all-in-ones and be basically tablets where you buy based on screen sizes and probably able to wireless connect more displays.

Technology in computing will become more abstracted and IT's specialists will shrink once again because actual tech literacy will decrease.

I think the only reason it hasn't started yet is due to Internet throughput availability but that's quickly changing.

A boring dystopia indeed.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Kallioapina@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Thats the exact reason I just donated my old pc to my sisters kids as a "practice computer", encouraging them to go rummaging around.

What woke me up was all these 20-somethings in our uni having trouble using computers. Damn, how can you get through our secondary education in our country and not know how to use a normal Windows pc?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 35 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That brief, magical moment in time of about 2 decades in the "home computer revolution" of the 70s, 80s, and 90s, where you had to be an actual geek to be able to effectively use a computer are gone. That's how we all got trained. By being forced to learn if we wanted to do anything. Now, it's one-button instant gratification.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Katzastrophe@feddit.de 21 points 9 months ago (12 children)

Partially yeah, but atleast Google Drive and Onedrive still have folders to sort and share more than one file, which sometimes gets the kids to actually use those features.

What also killed the basic understanding of PCs, is the way in which everything is now done "in-Browser". No longer do you need to open Word to edit a document, nor do you need to open Photoshop. It's all done in the browser, and if you want to simply "save" a document, well, just don't close the tab and you're golden.

[–] SwampYankee@mander.xyz 20 points 9 months ago (6 children)

just don’t close the tab

My RAM is screaming.

[–] hips_and_nips@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] flintheart_glomgold@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Indeed! I introduced my kids to this through the example of our in-house Plex server, and it worked really well.

First they "get it" because Plex works like the streaming services they're used to and they think "oh neat mom can do that too."

Then they like it more because I show them how its streaming we can control ourselves - streaming home movies and pics really impresses this upon them.

And then they see that there's no magic to where the content comes from -- it's a digital file on Plex just as it is on Netflix.

Voila. Free thinkers for life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gila@lemm.ee 28 points 9 months ago (3 children)

This makes me sad. I had so much fun growing up learning about compression and encoding, ripping, tagging, spectral analysis. Listening to 24/96 vinyl FLACs on my parents old stereo with my pinky up. Hanging out with a bunch of 40-year olds on IRC. Good times, man

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Hanging out with a bunch of 40-year olds on IRC.

Heh, now we're the 40-olds on IRC.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 125 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Look, it's on it's last legs, but Bandcamp and Bandcamp Fridays still exist.

Reasonable cost, money goes directly to the artist, and you get high quality FLACs with no DRM to keep permanently.

I pirate a lot, but I also spend a lot of money at Bandcamp trying to get money directly in the hands of the artists I enjoy.

[–] BustinJiber@lemmy.world 53 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And Bandcamp Friday is today.

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago (3 children)

For those who are unfamiliar with both Bandcamp and Bandcamp Friday, can you ELI5?

[–] otterpop@lemmy.world 47 points 9 months ago

You can buy music without DRM on Bandcamp, and on Bandcamp Friday a larger share goes directly to the creator. It's a great way to support your favorite artists.

[–] deranger@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

They waive the 20% fee on bandcamp friday, all money goes to the artist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 81 points 9 months ago (14 children)
[–] NotPersonal@lemmy.world 46 points 9 months ago (9 children)

but yt audio quality is terrible.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 43 points 9 months ago (5 children)

but yt audio quality is terrible.

So are the bluetooth speakers and ear buds that most people use to listen to music these days.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 65 points 9 months ago (12 children)

I have a slightly different suggestion.

Inflation is crap and the first thing to go are subscriptions that raise their prices when people are already hurting. If you want retention, keep your prices locked when users are having bad times and you're raking in record profits.

I think curation is great too, but I also think age plays a lot into individual views. A bunch of the younger guys at work were saying how they didn't want playlists and they didn't want to listen to an album, they just wanted to hit a button that knew their tastes musically and would give them a mix of familiar likes and new discoveries. The proceeded to describe a radio station to me, sans commercials. They were hot on all the music streaming and though I was crazy for wanting to spend time sorting through music.

Looking at a Spotify by age graph, the boomers dig it (because it's easy?), Gen-Z and the Younger Millennials dig it, Gen X has less than half the uptake of the other groups.

We were mixing our own tapes in our tweens and teens. We wired ourselves to find music, copy it and play it in the specific order we want.

or at least that's my story and I'm sticking to it.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] hushable@lemmy.world 62 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

One of the main reasons I still pay for Spotify is because it is very cheap in my country, specially when splitting a family plan. However I noticed that the user experience has gone downhill over the past years.

I remember when I could seamlessly switch playback devices, from my car to my phone, to my computer and them a Chromecast almost instantaneously. Now I'm lucky if my devices recognise each other even if they are on the same network.

And if you have a poor internet connection, the app is near unusable because it tries yo grab online content first before checking whatever is downloaded. Time and time again I have to put my phone on aeroplane mode just for the main menu to load, it is so frustrating and this didn't happen some 5-6 years ago

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago (4 children)

All of those things are 100% legitimate criticisms, I want to add that the UX experience has become more and more horrible. They've regressed terribly in most aspects of their apps, wether PC or Mobile. Absolutely unbelievable, this is the thing I see from Google search where marketing takes over from engineering/customer needs/market reality/I don't know what. Stop shoving shit into the services. You beat piracy for a minute, you can keep that lead, you're slowly losing it.

Honestly, if this was any other product this would be unacceptable. It'd be like all books went back to only black and white, all movies were only 480p, all music was only mono.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Qvest@lemmy.world 61 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Not fun is pressing play one day and finding a big chunk of your carefully constructed playlist is "no longer in your library."

this is exceptionally true from my experience with Spotify. I had downloaded a playlist that had a specific song. One day I went to play my locally downloaded playlist only to glance over it and see that the song was unavailable. I had the song downloaded. In my device and it still removed the song. No warnings, no nothing. Ever since, I downloaded everything locally and completely ditched Spotify. Fuck this scummy behaviour

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 60 points 9 months ago (32 children)

I wish we had Google Play Music again. It really was an excellent app and had flawless suggestions for me I always enjoyed, and truly the most intuitive mixes. Google is evil of course, but honestly one of the best features was the listing of bands playing near you in the upcoming weeks, I went to so many shows because I'd try their music via the GPM suggestions.

I listen to the Henry Rollins show on KCRW to try to get into new music but despite my appreciation of him I find his music tastes repetitive. How many weeks in a row can I listen to the Jesus and Mary Chain?

[–] Tier1BuildABear@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I don't listen to nearly as much music these days, YouTube music is so ass, I really miss gpm. YouTube can't even get notifications right, like I get a notification that a band I like released a new album or something so I tap it........ and it just fuckin opens the home page of the app??? EVERY SINGLE TIME. How do you fuck up even the most basic feature of the notifications?!?!

The "radio" always brings me back to the same shit that's playing on the actual radio, regardless of me playing the radio based off of bluegrass or fuckin clown techno idfk it will play imagine dragons and blinding lights shit eventually, guaranteed. The algorithms are actually dumpster fires.

Probably around 60% of the roughly 20,000 songs I uploaded (I think that was the limit) didn't get transferred over and are just gone. Thanks Google.

Also even though the notifications don't work, it is nice to know when your favorite artists release something new. Gpm was great about this, ytm seems to think I want the hottest vevo shit

Also who the fuck ever thought it was a good idea to use the music video versions for songs instead of the song version, when we're in the music app, should be fired into the sun. They're probably the same person that originally synced your video and music "histories," skewing your YouTube algorithm entirely so your homepage would suggest nothing but music videos

Seriously, what a shitshow of an app, but that's where most of Google is headed these days

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[–] tordenflesk@lemmy.world 52 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Never left, baby! Although ripping from YouTube should be a last resort. And even then, use a proper tool like Yt-dlp.

[–] Fluid@aussie.zone 44 points 9 months ago (7 children)

It's taken longer than I expected, but more and more people are realising streaming services as a model are not good, by any measure.

They cost more in the long run, you are made powerless as a consumer (perpetually increasing costs and removing your favourite content), and you can't even get 'everything at the convenience of your fingertips' cause the market is fragmented and they remove things periodically. You own nothing and pay more. Absolutely stupid model that deserves to die.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] sucricdrawkcab@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Piracy creates an endless loop of artists taking advances and eventually losing royalties. That's just what I've seen growing up in the music /film/ TV industry and briefly working in both. Screw labels and Spotify but go support artists and actually buy stuff.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.social 40 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

Artists have never made much on sales anyway. Go to shows.

“It’s my understanding that I had over 80 million streams on Spotify this year, So, if I’m doing the math right that means I earned $12. Enough to get myself a nice sandwich at a restaurant. So, from the bottom of my heart, thanks for your support, and thanks for the sandwich.” - Weird Al

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 38 points 9 months ago (4 children)

It never left. My MP3 collection is getting kinda disgusting at this point. I really should delete a bunch of it, but you never know when I'm going to want to listen to that album I downloaded 15 years ago and haven't gotten into yet!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] s08nlql9@lemm.ee 34 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The problem isn't price. People just don't want to pay for a bad experience.

It's all about the price for me cause I live in a 3rd world country. Even if their service improves, I will not hesitate for a second to pirate stuff. I'll just use the money i save to pay the internet bill instead of availing a monthly sub

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Never a bad time to plug ListenBrainz. ListenBrainz logs what you listen so you can keep track of what you hear and it helps you get recommendations and insights into your listening habits. It's not specifically for music pirates but it is compatible with music piracy. You can submit listens from all kinds of sources, youtube, spotify, but also local files (pirated or not). ListenBrainz is FOSS and publishes all their data on a open license, for the benefit of everyone.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago

Sheesh, kids have it so easy now... Back in my day, we had to set sail along the Atlantic trade routes looking for ships full of the latest wax cylinders out of Europe and Asia. Didn't have anything to play them on but at least we owned our collections.

[–] JuanR@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago (10 children)

I used to do lots of piracy back in the days. I am so glad those days are behind me and have not been big on the scene. What would be some sites to avoid to not fall in the trap of being a criminal. I love giving companies all of my money and do not ever want to go back to my old ways. Please help me with a nice list of things to avoid.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

If I download music, I have access to a larger music library, the ability to change the pitch, speed, and equalizer of the music, and the freedom to choose the player that I want. Can't do that with a streaming service.

I try to support artists if I can still download the music in a DRM-free file. Just this week I made a purchase, and late last year I bought an album and a midi file to support two artists.

And this is for personal listening. I make sure to follow royalty laws and attribute the artist when the music ends up in something I publish to the Internet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Oha@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 25 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I fucking love my selfhosted flac collection! 250gb and growing

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mint_tamas@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (2 children)

For me, it’s neither the price nor the quality of apps (idgaf, it plays music in the background). The thing that pushes me towards piracy is the same as for movies and TV shows: disappearing content. Because of content licensing deals, every piece of media is temporary on a service. I do rewatch movies from time to time and it’s infuriating if it’s gone (or rather would be, if I was still paying for any streaming service). This is especially true for music. My Spotify favorites list has a huge percentage of greyed out entries (and I’m pretty sure there are things that were outright deleted).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

Over 20 years ago, the internet was revolutionized through free music file sharing. Today, Napster’s legacy lives on through websites that rip YouTube’s audio.

Is this guy a boomer or a zoomer? It sure seems like he doesn't know that what made Napster great wasn't really the downloading so much as how it facilitated discovering new music. Looking through other people's collections while the thing you came for downloaded was amazing.

Edit: I looked it up, Zoomer

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 23 points 9 months ago (27 children)

I wanna know what is so different from my experience with Spotify. Because as far as enshittification goes, it hasn't really changed since I first began using it almost a decade ago aside from the price going up a little last year. I mean, I constantly see people saying it has ads even with premium but I have not once ever heard a single ad for anything, even for Spotify's own services on the platform, that was put there by Spotify and not simply already in a podcast that would be there from any source of listening to said podcast.

Maybe it's because most of the artists I like are fuckin dead so their shit never gets removed 🤷🏻‍♂️

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What are you saying OP? You don't want video and paid, exclusive podcasts on your streaming service? /s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›