this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
58 points (95.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

49608 readers
1170 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In my understanding, the "cease and desist" letter from χwitter against XCancel and Nitter is a warning to stop copyright infringement based on US-Law. The US-Law has no effect on most parts of the world. Why cant we just ignore it altogether? I understand that it will be problematic for US- Citizen but everyone else just have to obey their own countries jurisdiction.

Is there a point in the Internets infrastructure that the USA has enough leverage on to stop it anyway? Or am i downplaying the Influence of US Law on judicial decisions in other countries?

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Copyright law is highly harmonized in most countries, and has been for a very long time https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_Convention

I mean you could run it from places that don't really respect copyright laws but that means no EU etc.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The harmonisation does not mean much.

The Us copyright counts if the new company is doing business in Usa (regardless where the company is).

If they do not care about any users from there, and do not take money from there (for example from ads) they can show them the finger.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Until you remember ICANN is a US org and will give your domain to whomever a judge tells them to, or your CDN disabling your services, or your VM host, crashHub is owned by M$ so they will comply with a takedown of a repo.

"I'm not in the US it doesn't effect me" makes as much sense as "I don't care about privacy, I have nothing to hide"

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

They can put it under the TLD of a country like Belarus or North Korea. But I guess that would be too much of a hassle.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"I'm not in the US it doesn't effect me"

That's not what I said.
It is about your doing business there, or not.

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they do not care about any users from there, and do not take money from there (for example from ads) they can show them the finger.

What's the basis for this? (More specifically: is this from a specific jurisdiction?)

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What's the basis for this?

The simple principle that a country's law is in force in this country, while in another country it is that other country's law. It is also called sovereignty.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The US doesn't respect sovereignty. Hence our sanctions regimes, embargoes, and charging people that have never been to the united states or done business with it with crimes and extraditing them. Ie, people for drugs in latin america that never did business with americans.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

The US doesn't respect sovereignty.

That doesn't change the principle of sovereignty.
Usa has yet to learn.

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, I meant more specifically about the dependency on users and income.

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Adding on to the comment about the Berne Convention: Threats of legal action are sometimes meant to intimidate and inconvenience. It doesn't really matter if they have legal standing or not. The fear of having to defend yourself in court (or a service provider deciding the don't want the risk and dropping you) is sometimes enough. These letters are super cheap to draft and send so they are sometimes scatter shot.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 6 points 2 days ago

Which is basically what patent trolls do. Most of their claims would not win in court, they are threatening people with having to fight a long expensive court battle or pay them less than that battle would cost.

It is extortion.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 12 points 2 days ago

Its because the US strongarmed its "allies" into being clients of their software and copyright laws. I wish Europe would tell them where to stick it so we can have a short, sharp break from US bigtech and their terrorist government.

[–] yogurt@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not copyright, they're claiming x and itter are trademark infringement and that scraping is hacking in Texas. That's legally bullshit even in the US, but SpaceX lawyers not even trying is it's own kind of intimidation.

Ultimately the richest guy in the history of civilization is mad at you, he's a neo-Nazi international pedophile ring conspirator dissociated on ketamine that thinks he's in the Matrix, he has a personal private army deputized as federal Marshalls by the US president, and he owns an intercontinental ballistic missile system that can fire a 10 ton tungsten rod into your country's capitol from orbit and decapitate your entire government. That's not a legal problem it's a mutually assured destruction problem.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

he has a personal private army deputized as federal Marshalls by the US president, and he owns an intercontinental ballistic missile system that can fire a 10 ton tungsten rod into your country’s capitol from orbit and decapitate your entire government.

Who is on Ketamine?

Leaving aside the scifi conspiracy crap, (And I'm holding out hope you're just kidding) "Rods from God" are almost as stupid as space lasers. Every Newton of energy released by a kinetic weapon must fist be stored as potential energy, i.e. lifting 10 tons into orbit.

But you can't just do it once. You'd need several projectiles for each launch platform, and you'd need multiple platforms to credibly threaten the whole earth, and more still if you don't want to wait hours for the launch platform to orbit over your target.

Ballistic nuclear weapons are superior in every concealable way and that's why we built those instead of scifi fever-dreams and star wars.

[–] y0kai@anarchist.nexus 4 points 2 days ago

It depends where the sites are hosted, afaik.

But you're right in that if they fall outside of a DMCA friendly jurisdiction the site owners can tell Elon to go fuck himself, and they should.