this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2026
740 points (98.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

47389 readers
1718 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I hate the practice of Hostile Architecture/Anti-Homeless Architecture, just let someone sleep till the sun comes up. As long as they ain't hurting anyone or the area then, it's whatever.

[–] arc99@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

A symptom of homelessness being a thing although it's a quite understandable mitigation too.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

yay. inconveniencing people AND making homeless people's lives worse. Makes sense. /s

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

"its putting your head in the sand, kicking the can down the road" policy, no intention of alleviating it. probably gives reason for certain politicians to get elected. our region started doing something to the homeless in an area of our city(sweeping leo prescence, especially when world event/conferences are around) and they immediately move near the WFoods where i frequent, and they are robbing it blind(because store policy is not even to approach or give them customer service). when before they were more spread out and congregate in an area, that they dont stray far from causing "less" problems.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 9 points 8 hours ago

Mildly infuriating? This is disgusting shit.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 6 points 9 hours ago

I guess it's time to put a bench there, get a hammer drill, put some holes in the cement, and bolt that fucker to the ground, and then round the bolts so they can't take it out.

[–] Ravenheart@lemmy.zip 37 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Hostile infrastructure, intended to heap misery upon the most miserable among us. We punish people who should be helped, and help people who should be punished. What a backwards world.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Somewhere, something changed and money became all, get it all so you can consume. People stopped caring unless money was involved and they were getting it.

[–] Ravenheart@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Capitalism only cares about money.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 3 points 8 hours ago

Correct. The money must be obtained without morality or ethics... And laws are written to be both be worked around or punished with fines, hence making them an operating expense.

The only crime that is punished is those done by people with limited or no political or economic leverage. This is why burglary and shoplifting is heavily punished but a a company bankrupting entire communities is not.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

But it wasn't like this 25 years ago

[–] TR3@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I guess this is how English and Spanish work but coming from language where the word “free” is not used in similar manner I find it somewhat funny that here we have “free zone / zona libre” and it means that the bench is locked and so many things are prohibited.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The Spanish is a bit easier since it literally translates to "Zone Free of..." followed by a list of things it's a zone free from but I agree, since a "drug free zone" and a "gun free zone" mean that there is, ideally according to the sign, no drugs or guns but a "weapons free zone" would mean you're free to shoot combatants on sight, whereas a "weapon free zone" would mean an area without weapons.

[–] peacepath@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

using "something free" to say that thing is prohibited sounds so 1984…

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 18 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Ooh, free lock-picking practice!

I don't think it would be illegal to non-destructively unlock that lock.

- Ex-cop

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

It's a master lock, it won't give you as much practice time as you hope.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Anything is practice. Repetitive behavior hones skills. Experience is experience, good or bad. Maybe the skill is doing in the open quick enough to not draw attention.

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm aware. If you really want a pedantry fight:

Nothing about my comment implies it would be a long practice session.

[–] wookiepedia@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Very curious about a hypothetical: You pick the lock and secure it elsewhere on the bench so that it's not lost and accidentally affix a proper lock keeping the bench in the bench position.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I was not looking for any kind of fight and I actually did suspect you knew. I was just hopping on the opportunity to mock Master Lock, since I know they make some of the worst locks on the market.

Full disclosure: I have zero lock picking skills. I probably couldn't pick this lock if I tried.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 2 points 9 hours ago

You probably could. They're really not very hard.

[–] anewfox@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

not just the worst, but they somehow manage to release new locks that are worse than their old ones, as well as new locks with positively ancient design flaws that every lock manufacturer absolutely knows about, like not including a rear shield in the core, meaning you can just... stick something in there and open it trivially. i'm talking design flaws from the 1800s and early 1900s. their most secure core is used in a PLASTIC LOTO LOCK and none of their metal locks, for no fucking reason. the incompetence is unbelievable.

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Fair enough. My hackles are usually up thanks to how people treat me.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I think it would be a lot more fun though to non-destructively unlock the lock and replace it with another one that looks identical every single day after you free the bench and put it in its upright state, locking it in place.

They'll think that they've got the wrong key every single day. Just keep buying locks and replacing it.

[–] HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

That's more illegal than I can openly suggest.

[–] cinoreus@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

Mfs be living in pharloom

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's got to be annoying just to lock and unlock a bench probably every day. Also the bench can still be used as a backboard while you sit on the ground.

It doesn't stop being a chair it's just hostile architecture

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 5 points 16 hours ago

Not with that lock they don't lol.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 72 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Why are they so obsessed with making sure the homeless don't get a basic, involuntary need? Like just shoot them if you are going to be this cruel, and you are going to kill them anyway.

[–] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Capitalism requires there to be a threat of what happens if you "don't work hard enough" or don't play ball with those in power. Nevermind that most homeless people aren't that way due to laziness or anything they did wrong, just unlucky situations or medical debt or being laid off at an inconvenient time or something.

It would be far cheaper to our country to have free housing, UBI, universal healthcare and social programs everywhere than what we are doing now, but what we are doing now makes about 1,000 people INSANELY wealthy at the expense of the other 342,000,000 people in the country, so that's what we keep doing for some stupid reason.

Maybe one day everyone will wake up and stop enabling systems that create this shithole.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There's about 40 other capitalist countries where losing your job doesn't end in homelessness and medical debt is not even a thing. And we have universal Healthcare, paid annual leave, paid parental leave, unlimited paid sick leave, unions,...

Basically there's only one country where all of that doesn't exist...

[–] Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Medical debt might not be a thing but losing your home because you lost your job definitely happens in Europe.

Yes, losing your home after losing your job definitely happens in Europe. The difference is that many European countries have stronger safety nets: they may help with rent, provide temporary or social housing, or use Housing First, so unemployment is less likely to end in rough sleeping. They generally won’t simply pay off your mortgage, and the help isn’t guaranteed, but keeping people stably housed can be cheaper in the long run than repeatedly dealing with homelessness. It also makes finding and keeping work much easier. In the UK, for example, eligible people may receive Jobseeker’s Allowance and help with their rent through Universal Credit, or Housing Benefit in certain circumstances.

[–] whereitsat@lemmy.zip 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

they're still sticking to the trope that the homeless are lazy, uneducated bums; at best they're what happens to good citizens after falling into addiction.

they all WANT to be there, but we definitely don't want them!!!

but that narrative should be falling apart as conditions deteriorate...

but you know, american education lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] raze2012@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The cruelty is the point. They'll say a homeless person doesn't deserve a fee hundred bucks a month to get back on their feet, but they'll spend 100 grand a year per person to make them more miserable. It's just good job security (and satisfaction) for the police unions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 26 points 23 hours ago

Cruelty is definitely a big part of it but also NIMBYism. If we don't see the homeless people, we don't have to think about them and try to find solutions.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

We need societal-level solutions to homelessness. We need housing, free healthcare, free mental healthcare, criminal justice reform, and more. But until we can do that, the reality is, concentrations of the homeless are associated with higher crime, reduced patronage of businesses, and decreased property values.

It super duper sucks, but homelessness is a really difficult problem for cities and property owners they aren't equipped to address. Since they can't fix the problem, they instead focus on keeping the problem away.

It's all so fucked.

This feels like a very US-specific way of framing it. In the UK and much of Europe, many of those “societal-level solutions” already exist to varying degrees: healthcare and mental healthcare free at the point of use, unemployment support, benefits towards rent, social and temporary housing, legal homelessness-prevention duties, and Housing First programmes.

They’re nowhere near perfect. We have social-housing shortages, benefit limits, long healthcare waiting lists and plenty of people who still fall through the gaps. But the response doesn’t have to begin and end with moving homeless people somewhere less visible to protect property values.

Your point that individual businesses and property owners cannot solve homelessness is completely fair. That’s precisely why they should sit behind a publicly funded safety net which helps keep people housed and supports them back into stability, instead of leaving everyone involved to deal with the consequences.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

It's easier to lock up a bench than build an affordable home.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] krusieagenda@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago

You can open a Master Lock with a Master Lock.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 79 points 1 day ago (12 children)

If you don't want to see homeless people in your park: HOUSE THEM

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›