this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2026
217 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31093 readers
1869 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bunnybunny@lemmy.zip 55 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Maybe not vote for a fraudulent pedophile next time?

[–] nightwatch_admin@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They will do it again and prove you wrong next time!

[–] newton@feddit.online 1 points 6 days ago

He said anyway, THAT you only had to vote once, and then never again

[–] NuanceDemon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago

These are not the sort of people to take advice, period.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, but the alternative was men in women's sports and trans for everyone.

[–] jagermo@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also, she had a cackling laugh!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

There's also the problem that she was a she. I wonder what happens if the Seven Mountain Mandate type of loons get confronted with a female Republican as a presidential candidate, by the way. There's that whole biblical thing that women should not rule over men...

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

Friendly reminder that JD Vance invested, and likely still has stake, in AcreTrader that facilitates buying farmland. https://www.farmlandgrab.org/post/32430-jd-vance-funded-acretrader-here-s-why-that-matters

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 24 points 1 week ago

Fighting for America farmers by undercutting prices with imported mystery meat...

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Stock up on dried beans and rice folks.

Seriously. Do it.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago
[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

How about them bootstraps tho?

[–] blastosist@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

As long as there is a trans swimmer somewhere, these dummies will continue to vote against their interests.

[–] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago

Are we great yet?

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh no, if only someone could have foreseen this completely obvious and predictable outcome.

Living in farm country, I'm constantly baffled at how many support someone who has shown how little he cares for your industry for a decade. Kinda hard to feel sorry for the farmer who's looking at losing his farm with a trump sign out on his barbed wire fence.

Sucks to suck, how about that local sportsball team? They really walked it in last night, huh?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I grew up in an extremely rural area in the 80s and I saw it then, too. The wildest thing was to hear all these people ripping on welfare, constantly.

Meanwhile, I think government programs of one type or another propped up most of the area. But people that were collecting it didn't seem to realize or want to admit that they were benefactors of welfare.

Nope, it's only "welfare" if it was going to "those people" in the cities, you see.

[–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Maybe a similar mechanism of some closeted gay people really hating and rallying against the gays

[–] DarkDecay@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Just wait till Canada starts hold back some of that potash supply cause of Trump's trade war...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Hm, I wonder what percentage of farmers voted for donnie dipshit?

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Before Iran related inflation, there was always anti China policies, such that farmers have been losing money every year since 2016. Losses should be much higher than article states because grain futures are still on low end, with the assumption that China will buy some of the crop still.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Don't forget tariffs on Canadian potash.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago

They're going to remove this post without an alternative source link.

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

This is what happens when you are evil pieces of garbage.