this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
141 points (96.7% liked)

Selfhosted

40719 readers
486 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
141
How I accidentally slowed down my nextcloud instance for months (feddit.it)
submitted 10 months ago by Moonrise2473@feddit.it to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I am running this docker image: https://github.com/nextcloud/docker with a cloudflare tunnel, meaning the webserver would see all the traffic coming from a single ip in 172.16.0.0/12 .

The documentation says:

The apache image will replace the remote addr (IP address visible to Nextcloud) with the IP address from X-Real-IP if the request is coming from a proxy in 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12 or 192.168.0.0/16 by default

So I thought that this is a not a problem, as other docker images can also automagically figure out the real IP address from traffic coming from cloudflare tunnels.

In the beginning it worked fine, then it was SLOW. Like 2 full minutes to load new feeds on news, waiting ages to complete a sync, and so on. I rebooted the server on those instances, and then it worked fine for a day.

So because at the time i was running it on unraid, i blamed the lag on that OS + my weird array of HDDs with decades of usage on them. Migrated to debian on a nvme array and... same lag!

Wasted hours trying to use caddy+fpm instead of apache and it's the same, worked fine for a day, then it was slow again.

Then I wondered: what if the program is "smart" and throttles it by itself without any warning to the admin if it thinks that an ip address is sending too many requests?

Modified the docker compose like this:

  nextcloud:
    image: nextcloud

became

  nextcloud:
    build: .

and I created a Dockerfile with

FROM nextcloud
RUN apt update -y && apt upgrade -y
RUN apt install -y libbz2-dev
RUN docker-php-ext-install bz2
RUN a2enmod rewrite remoteip
COPY remoteip.conf /etc/apache2/conf-enabled/remoteip.conf

with this as the content of remoteip.conf

RemoteIPHeader CF-Connecting-IP
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 10.0.0.0/8
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 172.16.0.0/12
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 192.168.0.0/16
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 173.245.48.0/20
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 103.21.244.0/22
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 103.22.200.0/22
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 103.31.4.0/22
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 141.101.64.0/18
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 108.162.192.0/18
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 190.93.240.0/20
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 188.114.96.0/20
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 197.234.240.0/22
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 198.41.128.0/17
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 162.158.0.0/15
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 104.16.0.0/12
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 172.64.0.0/13
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 131.0.72.0/22
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 2400:cb00::/32
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 2606:4700::/32
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 2803:f800::/32
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 2405:b500::/32
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 2405:8100::/32
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 2a06:98c0::/29
RemoteIPTrustedProxy 2c0f:f248::/32

and now because nextcloud is seeing all the different ip addresses it doesn't throttle the connections anymore!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Why do so many people tunnel their personal data through cloudflare anyways? No port forwarding possible? Or afraid of DDoS attacks? Or am I missing something?

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 38 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Security.

Cloudflare handles a very large amount of traffic and sees many different types of attacks (thinks CSRF, injections, etc.). It is unlikely that you or me will be individually targeted, but drive-bys are a thing, and thanks to the amount of traffic they monitor, the WAF will more likely block out anything and patch before I’m able to update my apps on 0 days.

Also, while WAF is a paid feature, other free features, such as free DDOS attack protection, help prevent other attacks.

It’s a trade off, sure; they’re technically MITM’ing your traffic, but frankly, I don’t care. Much like no one cares to target/attack me individually, they aren’t going to look at my content individually.

Additionally, it also makes accessing things much easier. Also, it is much more likely I’d find a SME using Cloudflare than some janky custom self hosted tunnel setup. So from a using homelab as a learning for professional experience point of view, it is much more applicable as well.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Thx for explaining. I'm not sure if I'm willing to do the same trade-offs. Supposedly their WAF is very good and quite some people use it. Probably for a good reason... It just comes at a hefty price. I'm doing selfhosting to emancipate myself, stay independent and in control. I'm not sure if becoming dependant on a single large company and terminating my encryption on their servers that do arbitrary magic and whatever with my packets is something that aligns with my goals. (Or ethics, since I think the internet is to connect people on a level playing field. And that's no longer the case once many people transfer control to a single entity.) But I don't see a way around that. Afaik you have to choose between one or the other. Are there competitors to cloudflare that handle things differently? Maybe provide people with the WAF and databases to run on their own hardware, let them stay in control and just offer to tunnel their encrypted data with a configurable firewall?

Edit: Just found modsecurity.org while looking that up. But I guess a good and quick database of bad actors' IPs is another thing that would be needed for an alternative solution.

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’d be a challenge to keep up — 0 days aren’t going to be added to self hosted solution faster than they could be detected and deployed on a massively leveraged system. Economy of scales at full display.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I mean theoretically... I guess, if they do it right? It depends a bit. Some Linux distributions are crazy fast with patching stuff. And some stable channels have a really good track record of open vulnerabilities. Nowadays that's not the only way of distributing software, vulnerability might depend on your docker container setup etc.

Are there actual numbers what Cloudflare adds on top? What 0-days they focus on? I mean do they have someone sitting there, reading Lemmy CVEs and then immediately getting to action to write a regex that filters out such requests?

And how much does it cost? They also list the same ModSecurity in their lower plans. I don't think 0day protection would help people like me if it's $200 a month.

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The difference in my opinion is that doesn't matter how fast upstream vendors patch issues, there's a window between issue being detected, patch being implemented, release getting pushed, notification of release gets received, and then finally update getting deployed. Whereas at least on cloud WAF front, they are able to look at requests across all sites, run analysis, and deploy instantly.

There is a free tier with their basic "Free managed ruleset", which they've deployed for everyone with orange cloud enabled when we saw the Log4J issue couple years back. This protection applies for all applications, not just the ones that were able to turn around quickly with a patch.

If you want more bells and whistles, there's a fee associated with it, and I understand having fees is not for everyone, though the price point is much lower -- you get some more WAF feature on the $25/mn ($20/mn amortized when paid annually) tier as well before having to fork out the full $250/mn ($200/mn when paid annually) tier. There's a documentation page on all the price points and rulesets available.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I tried to look it up but I wasn't very successful. What they do in their free tier keeps being a mystery to me. In the $20/month is the the core ruleset from ModSecurity. I don't need to pay them $20 to deploy that for me, the dataset is free and publicly available. I've just installed it on my VPS... It's only a few lines in Nginx to enable that.

And what you're talking about is $200 a month. I seriously doubt anyone here uses that plan for their homeserver. I wouldn't pay $2400 in a year for it.

I still don't get how that would work. Sure you can filter spam that way. And migitate attacks while the worst wave washes through the net. Or do machine learning and find out if usage patterns change. But how would it extend to 0-days faster than the software gets patched? This sounds more like snake-oil to me. If someone finds a way to inject something into a Nextcloud plugin and change things in the database so they have access... And then they do it to 100 cloudflare customers... How would Cloudflare know? If it's a 0-day, they -per definition- don't know in advance. And they're just WAF, they don't know if a user is authorized by mistake or if they're supposed to have access. And they don't know anything about my database, since it runs on my machine. And they also don't know about the endpoints of the software and which request is going to trigger a vulnerability unless this manifests in some obvious (to them) way. Like 100 machines immediately start blasting spam through their connection and there is one common request in the logfiles. Otherwise all they can do is protect against known exploits. Maybe race the software vendor and filter things before they got patched. I just don't see any substantial 0-day protection that extends to more than "keep your server up to date and don't use unmaintained software." Especially not for the home-user.

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The free tier rolled out was specifically to address upstream vendors patching Log4J too slowly. They’re able to monitor the requests and intercept malicious patterns before it hits the server running unpatched (due to upstream unavailable yet) applications. They are updating with more rules for the free tier set as far as they’ve stated. The extras from paid tiers are more extra rulesets and more analytics around what was blocked etc.

At the end of the day though, you do you; the benefit for me may not be benefit for you. I’m not selling their service, and have no benefit what so ever should anyone opt into their services.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Thx for explaining. I think I halfway know what this is about now. I don't think I'm their target group. But I learned something about web application firewalls in the process and that is a good thing. I think I'm going to activate that for some of my private services since it's so easy and look up if there are good ip ban lists. It's a bummer that I don't get to see proper documentation on this, since security is all about exact facts and scenarios. But I guess no answer is also an answer. If they just feed buzzwords to me, either my initial skepticism was warranted, or I'm just not their target audience and they only target enterprise users. Either way I'm better off with my current approach. I appreciate I got to learn something :-)

[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 3 points 10 months ago

No problem! I appreciate the civil discussion! Thank you!

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 10 months ago

I just use a VPS with caching and basic https stripping protection

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If they don't care to attack you why would they DDoS you. 😄

The things CF fans make up about "security" are hilarious.

If you ever got hit with a DDoS while on the free tier they'd just disconnect you.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

If you ever got hit with a DDoS while on the free tier they'd just disconnect you.

I can't find anything that supports that statement. What is your source?

From what I understand you can do a bunch of things when under attack like requiring captchas.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 24 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They think the free CF tier offers DDoS protection, which (a) will never happen to their server and (b) if it ever happened would consist of CF disconnecting their tunnel and black-holing their IP and domain until it blows over.

They also think CDN helps when your services are behind authentication.

Some of them just find it convenient that CF is registrar, DNS provider and sets up reverse proxy for them so they never stop to think too much about it.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Thanks. I read a lot of people recommending cloudflare. I believe a substantial amount of that group is on the free tier and not exactly making informed choices. Being a registrar, DNS provider and offering tunneling / port forwarding or some mechanism to traverse your home NAT are valid use-cases.

[–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 10 months ago

Some of them just find it convenient that CF is registrar, DNS provider and sets up reverse proxy

You should never put all your eggs in one basket. Using one company for all three of these essentially gives them full control of your domain.

It's a best practice to use separate companies for registrar and website/proxy. If there's ever some sort of dispute about the contents of the site, you can change the DNS to point to a different host. That's not always possible when the same company handles both.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Simple reason: at home I don't have a static IPv4 address and I can't do port forwarding

[–] caleb@lemmy.moorenet.casa 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

What about ddns?

Edit: never mind reread your comment and saw the port forwrding caveat. Sorry pal.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Thx, that is a good reason to do it. I'm eventually going to lose my static IPv4 address, too. But I'm preparing to move some of my services to a VPS instead and in the process set up the firewall and the reverse proxy to the Nextcloud on my homeserver and so on there (on that VPS.)

[–] Swarfega@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don't have a static IP but host services off my paid domain. I use duckdns and point host records to the duckdns address. I have to use CloudFlare to manage my DNS records for this to work.

https://developers.cloudflare.com/dns/cname-flattening/

[–] capital@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I do the same but I just use a script that runs periodically to update CloudFlare with my current IP with their native API.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Ah. Makes sense. I don't think you have to specifically use cloudflare in that case. But I remember CNAME records can't be used for everything... there are some limitations. I know I had issues with dyndns and a domain at some point. I just can't remember the details. I know it didn't work with every registrar / DNS provider. But some of them offer some magic to make some things work. I believe back then we ended up transferring that domain to some other hoster. And my domains are with a company that offers an API. I can just have a small script run in the background that changes around entries and do dyndns that way. But obviously you need to pay attention to things like the time to live for your records and set it accordingly once you do dyndns yourself.

[–] Swarfega@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The CNAME flattening is not a regular feature of DNS, so I have to use Cloudflare. Maybe other providers do the same, but I haven't looked around. It's certainly not something namecheap offer.

I point my TLD to the dynamic DNS record and then point to other records to the TLD as CNAME records. I'm using Nginx Proxy Manager to reverse proxy traffic to different services. These all live on a Raspberry Pi 4.

Imgur

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

https://www.namecheap.com/support/knowledgebase/article.aspx/10128/2237/how-to-create-an-alias-record/

https://kb.porkbun.com/article/85-how-to-connect-your-root-domain-when-your-web-host-wont-provide-an-ip-address

Took me a while to remember... I think other providers don't call it CNAME flattening, but ALIAS records. And namecheap lists them in their documentation. You maybe need to look it up if you're interested, but I think they do in fact offer it. (I mean I'm not advertising for or against anything here. If you're happy with your provider and your setup works, that's fine. It's definitely not available everywhere.)

[–] Swarfega@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Awesome info! I wasn't overly happy with having to use CloudFlare for just this one feature. I'll have a test with my registrar.

[–] dan@upvote.au 0 points 10 months ago

Get a $15/year VPS and run your own tunnel using Wireguard.

[–] Gutless2615@ttrpg.network 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Is there a better way to expose my services when behind an ISP cgnat?

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Cloudflare, Pagekite, a cheap VPS with a reverse proxy. Maybe IPv6-only access if your CGNat does that, ngrok, serveo, rathole, sish, a VPN... I also found portmap-io, webhook relay, packetriot and countless other smaller companies. There are quite some tools and services available. And which one is right for you might depend on the exact situation and what you're hosting. I'm not an expert on this. I have an internet connection without a NAT, and additionally a really tiny VPS with a mailserver, a small website and wireguard. I just use that to tunnel through NAT if i need to. But that means I haven't compared all the other services since I don't need them (yet.) I've learned a bit about Cloudflare from this discussion.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Because it makes them “feel” more secure.

[–] Netrunner@programming.dev 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

I just don't see the point of using cloudflared. Its easy to use but it just gives all your data to cloudflare in return for very little.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] doeknius_gloek@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 10 months ago

Interesting - I didn't bother to set the X-Real-IP headers until now and this might speed up my instance too. Thanks!

Then I wondered: what if the program is "smart" and throttles it by itself without any warning to the admin if it thinks that an ip address is sending too many requests?

The word you're looking for is "Rate Limit(ing)" and according to the documentation you could also disable it completely.

But I guess the cleanest and most secure solution would be to just set the headers on the reverse proxy.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Good job debugging it. Where'd you get that list of IPs?

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 3 points 10 months ago

It's the list of IPs that belong to cloudflare.

I think that because I'm using tunnels it's not necessary to have all of them, just the docker ip address space

[–] Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyz 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
CF CloudFlare
DNS Domain Name Service/System
IP Internet Protocol
NAT Network Address Translation
SSL Secure Sockets Layer, for transparent encryption
VPN Virtual Private Network
VPS Virtual Private Server (opposed to shared hosting)

7 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 15 acronyms.

[Thread #484 for this sub, first seen 4th Feb 2024, 22:45] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[–] JVT038@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does this also apply to linuxserver/nextcloud image? Because that's what I'm using.

load more comments
view more: next ›