this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
306 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

87826 readers
3409 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 5 points 1 hour ago

Apple is a garbage company. Better than google is not an acceptable measure, and they are only performitiely better than google anyway, they pretend to not kowtow a bit before they do. Google just deepthroats authority because they are the worst.

The only solution is here is to go open source. Tech is an existential risk to society, and already it's late to stop them. We can stop them though, together.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

His tenure is that of a businessman, not an innovator or visionary. Good or bad, Jobs was all three.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Vissonary maybe but innovator?

IPhones & MacBooks were well built & marketed but neither was really innovative.

[–] Smokeless7048@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Yes and no, the first iPhone was innovative, but after that, it just became refinement.

[–] AgentSeven@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 hours ago

15 years later and the Photos app on iOS is still the same nearly useless pile of shit.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The main thing I remember about Tim Cook was him making me realize how wealthy white cisgender gay men were hardly different from wealthy white cisgender straight men.

The whole article has always been really worth a read, seeing how a techbro tried to turn a classic magazine into a tech company somehow. Besides that though, these passages always stuck out to me, because it feels deeply like these wealthy men exploit their sexuality to justify avoiding critique of their actions outside of their sexuality.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/inside-collapse-new-republic

In 2014, Hughes’s personal life and business life became increasingly intertwined, in ways that would coincide with changes at the magazine. His husband, Sean Eldridge, was running for Congress in a district that spanned the Catskills and the Hudson Valley, but his political campaign was not going the way he had hoped. Eldridge and Hughes had bought a two-million-dollar home in a district in which neither of them had ever lived, and Eldridge began investing in local businesses in what was widely seen as a transparent effort to influence the race.

Ioffe dates the abrupt change in mood to late summer, shortly after Foer’s birthday party—the period when, as many current and former T.N.R. employees noted, Eldridge’s expensive campaign to win a congressional seat started looking hopeless. “We all liked him; he seemed to like us,” she told me. “Everything was going great. Then, in the summer, something snapped, and he started talking to me about money and how we’re losing money and he’s tired of it. And then he became just downright contemptuous and hostile toward us.”

Hughes’s eroding relationship with the staff took on an ideological edge. On the morning that Tim Cook, the C.E.O. of Apple, announced that he was gay, MacGillis wrote a note to “the Plank,” T.N.R.’s internal e-mail listserv for writers and editors. “I see the celebration of his announcement, while entirely justifiable, as another sign of what’s happened to liberalism today, where rights/identity liberalism trumps economic liberalism,” he wrote. “This is, after all, a guy who embodies so much of what’s amiss in the age of inequality—pulling down $378 million in 2011 alone; Apple skirting taxes more brazenly than anyone else—yet those revelations have caused barely a stir.”

Hughes responded to the note six minutes later: “I think those are valid issues, although Apple has acted squarely within the law,” he wrote. “The law itself is fucked up. But I don’t think you can underestimate the difficulty of his decision or how tone deaf that argument would be today.”

The other editorial employees on the list were surprised by the response. It was an internal listserv for writers and editors, and the staffers didn’t realize that Hughes, who had relinquished his title as editor-in-chief when he installed Vidra, was on it. MacGillis responded by saying that he would hold off on writing, but added, “Just for the record, though, it is not so clear that Apple acted squarely within the law. The law’s a mess, but Apple pushed the bounds of it more than anyone.” He pasted text from a piece in the Times that questioned some of Apple’s practices.

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 29 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Billionaires aren't people in the same sense that we are, Cook has turned his back on the queer community, so he can say whatever he wants about himself, but he's not gay in the same sense that the rest of us are.

[–] potato_lemon@feddit.nl 21 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah. Billionaires are not people. Good point.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 hours ago

Their biology is the same. What's missing is common cause.

[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 hours ago

because it feels deeply like these wealthy men exploit their sexuality to justify avoiding critique of their actions outside of their sexuality.

Not Gay, so don't know about that angle, but they are ALL some high level of Pscho - just to have ended up where they are. There is simply no way you can be the head of a big Corp and not have trampled on workers, co-workers, customers as well as more fair-minded smaller corps and anything in between. 'Competition' is a white-washing word for 'eternal economic war' that at that level always spills over to law-fare, info-wars, political corruption/manipulation, psy-ops and any dirty trick in the book - all in the name of 'Competition' and being "successful".

These sick people would sell someone else's mom as slaves if they could get ahead on that move, but will always appear lovely, friendly etc, simply because that is the image they want people to see, and that is the image they are paying big money to other corps to create.

It is pretty cringe to see people worshipping these disgusting sub-humans in charge of big corp..

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 50 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

Tim was great for the shareholders and not so much the customer.

I feel like most services got worse, hardware got worse before the M series, but post M I haven’t seen much innovation — just a lot of recycled parts for peripherals like Studio Display, which is premium price but sub premium quality (camera, panel itself, and ports/support).

Phones have massively homogenized under Cook

And software has taken a massive nose dive. As much as I try to like swift, it sucks. And it was a mistake to lose Chris Lattner, because without him Swift has had basically no focus or direction other than boosting SwiftUI.

Nobody has ever managed building production software with Swift outside of app dev, which I think says it finds a poor compromise on real performance vs ergonomics vs safety. I do not think Rust is better, I think Swift makes it too hard to do the right low level things.

AI/Siri has been embarrassing. Shipping cadence is worst in the business, there’s no reason so many updates are tied to OS updates, it’s simultaneously too rapid for trans to build robust software, and too slow to fix bugs and make QOL adjustments.

So when I look back on the last several years of Apple I kinda just see a bunch of departments duct taped together and drifting away from each other, and then the finance team driving all the decisions.

[–] fluxx@mander.xyz 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Having tried both Swift and Rust - you can hardly compare them. For me Rust is in a different league. Swift is a modernization and a step forward compared to ObjC, but Rust is a different paradigm altogether. Swift has IMO done a great job for Apple as a platform, but has not achieved universality and had not transcended the platform. Rust has achieved universality, but has not captured any platform in particular yet. Both have not and may never replace C/C++, though my biased opinion is rust may have a chance (at least with C++)

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 hours ago

I pick on Rust because of the “write everything in Rust” crowd and just personally I don’t like how the language feels.

I don’t think rust has found fit in the GUI sphere, though it’s getting some adoption from tools like zed, and hopefully some native gui tools get better with it. Swift has some fit there, but it’s not a fair comparison because it’s forced. Swift has nice ergonomics though with callbacks and lib dispatch plus combine that work well for GUIs.

Swift also suffered from poor versioning tools, and platform code differences which have hurt it even if they’ve been patched over.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 hours ago

Honest question: how can you make your mark on a product that is already perfect? At some point, software goes from meeting the needs of its customers to meeting the needs of the egos in charge.

As an aside:

There will be some quick tells as to whether incoming new Apple CEO John Ternus is more of the same, including seeing whether or not Apple follows Google's lead and buckles to our mad king's obsession with trying to rename large bodies of water to feed his gargantuan ego.

John Apple is a spineless fuckwit and immediately capitulated

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

RIP Tim Apple. You embarrassed a once innovative brand but at least you made a lot of money.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Cook diversified Apple’s product lineup, overseeing the introduction of many new products such as the AirPods, Apple Watch, Apple Vision Pro, AirTag, Apple silicon in its Mac lineup and expanding its services business.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 22 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Timothy Donald Cook (born November 1, 1960) is an American business executive who served as the chief executive officer (CEO) of Apple Inc. from 2011 to 2026, and has been the company's executive chairman since September 2026.

https://www.macrumors.com/2025/08/07/tim-cook-gift-to-trump/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Cook

[–] capital5@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 7 hours ago

s/gift/bribe/

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, once we reduced electronics to black slabs and tiny earbuds there’s not much more we can revolutionize

[–] Mynameisallen@lemmy.zip 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

We could have not done that, or we could have at least made the software better.

I remember thinking things like rollable screens and shit would be fun, but even that shit no one wants to risk anymore

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

We could have not done that, or we could have at least made the software better.

Blame jobs, not cook.

Also, fuck jobs, the liver stealing psycho

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Blame jobs, not cook.

Why not both?

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

fuck em both, but Cook wasn't the one that started the enshittification trend with the ipod

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

Yea, fuck them both.

[–] TheBluetoofs@piefed.social 15 points 9 hours ago

Agreed. The new CEO isn’t off to a great start, either. Bending the knee in your first few days is not a good look.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

MacOS was so much better when Steve Jobs was in charge.

Tim Cook REALLY made it worse. Steve Jobs made sure the user experience was generally good, although admittedly there were many times when he was pigheaded. On a personal level, Steve Jobs was a terrible person, but he made the operating system very good and very consistent.

And Tim Cook didn't care about any of that, and macOS is now SUPER inconsistent and much less user friendly. It's still better than Windows, but MAN is it so so so much worse.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 24 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

admittedly there were many times when he was pigheaded

Arguably, he'd still be alive today if he wasn't so pigheaded.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Behind the Bastards had a good one on Jobs, where they went into a little bit how he believed in this mucus theory, it was pure madness. And it’s why he died.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 18 points 8 hours ago

It's still better than Windows

The problem there is that Windows has been lowering the bar for a decade now.

[–] JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Engineers made the OS good. Steve didn't do shit.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, Apple were doing so great with their engineers until 1997, and then Jobs came back and ruined things.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Well that's not correct.

Engineers are great at developing a product.

But having someone at the end who's using the product and insisting on consistency because he's anal-retentive and a pain in the ass will mean the product is consistent with the evaluator's goals.

macOS used to have a lot of underlying features that worked consistently no matter which app you were using, and Apple destroyed that.

Either Jobs was having an effect, or it's a damned strange coincidence that the severe reduction in consistency in macOS started just at the point that he died.

[–] NedRyerson@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I read that as "spineless copulation" and was both confused and a little intrigued as to how that could be

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 hours ago

Plenty of nonchordate animals reproduce sexually. Tapeworms, for example.

[–] aarRJaay@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Its not a shiny in your face thing so people dont care, but its something amazing that happened under him.

They also got their first modem, the C series, as well which is quite an achievement. Already got 2 iterations and a 3rd coming out in 2027.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 9 hours ago

Such a bottom.